Showing posts with label Toyota. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Toyota. Show all posts

Sunday, 12 February 2012

2012 Toyota Prius

2012 Toyota Prius PhotosFor more than a decade, the Toyota Prius has been the public face of hybrid cars. A new, third-generation model was completely redesigned for 2010 to offer more features and even higher gas mileage. Now, for 2012, the Prius name expands beyond the iconic hatchback to include two new models.
The 2012 Toyota Prius hatchback hardly meddles with the pattern established in 2004: It's a five-door hatchback with a high tail and a split rear window. It's the most aerodynamic shape for a five-passenger mid-size car, and the Prius has one of the lowest drag coefficients of any car on the market--all in the service of fuel economy, which the EPA rates at a combined 50 mpg.
Inside, the styling is Space Age, complete with a "flying buttress" console that offers storage space underneath, though it can be hard to get to. The dashboard splits information into two areas: an Information Center mounted high and close to the windshield base, and more conventional instruments behind the wheel closer to the driver. Plastic surfaces are mostly hard, but the effect is distinctive if hardly luxurious.
The 1.8-liter engine is paired with Toyota's Hybrid Synergy Drive, which uses a pair of motor-generators that can power the car solely on electricity (at speeds up to 30 mph), add torque to supplement the engine power, and recharge the battery pack during engine overrun or braking. The combined output of the engine and hybrid system is 134 horsepower.
The 2012 Toyota Prius hardly handles in a way to gladden the hearts of sports-car drivers. The 0-to-60-mph time is just under 10 seconds, and the continuously variable nature of the hybrid system means engine noise isn't proportional to road speed--which can take some getting used to for new drivers. The electric power steering is lifeless and numb (as it seems to be on all Toyota models that use it), but it responds fine and the car gets itself around corners adequately. The blending of regenerative braking with the all-disc friction brakes is excellent, and Toyota's had longer experience than any other maker in refining it.
With the interior volume of a mid-size car, the Toyota Prius hatchback offers plenty of space for four adults, or five if the back-seat passengers are willing to stagger their shoulders. Rear-seat legroom benefits from hollowed-out front seatbacks, but in front, the seat padding is skimpy and the hard-plastic center console cuts into knee room for taller drivers.
The 2012 Toyota Prius fits seven airbags as standard, along with the usual array of anti-lock brakes, stability and traction control, and a tire-pressure monitoring system. Radar-based adaptive cruise control, a rear-view camera, and a lane-departure warning system are all optional, as is a "Safety Connect" system to alert first responders after a crash. The much-publicized Intelligent Parking Assist, which controls the steering wheel to help parallel-park a Prius using the car's cameras--though the driver must brake--is a step in the right direction, though Ford's system is better.
For 2012, the Prius five-door comes in four trim levels: Two, Three, Four, and Five. There's an ultra-stripped-down base-level Prius One, but it's only for fleet purchase, and civilians can't buy it. The lowest-level Two and Three models are priced in the low twenties, but the highest-spec trim levels--with either the Technology Package or the first-in-your-neighborhood solar moonroof panel, which runs a small ventilation fan to cool the cockpit when the Prius is parked--will go upwards of $30,000.
Notable features include the Touch Tracer steering-wheel controls, which let drivers swipe and navigate through menus displayed in the Information Display, keeping their eyes closer to the road ahead than if they focus on the close-in cluster. Remote air conditioning, LED headlamps, Bluetooth, and a navigation system are also available.
The biggest Prius news for 2012 is the addition of two new models. The first is the 2012 Toyota Prius V wagon, which offers far more load space, all the traditional Prius virtues, and a combined EPA gas-mileage rating of 42 mpg. After a series of delays due to the 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan, it went on sale late in 2011.
Coming in the early part of 2012 is the Toyota Prius Plug-In Hybrid, the first mass-market Toyota to plug into the electric grid to recharge its battery pack. It's virtually identical to the Prius five-door hatchback on the outside, but its battery pack holds three times as much energy, and plugging it in to recharge gives it 8 to 13 miles of all-electric range against the 1 or 2 miles provided by the standard model. Note, however, that unlike the Chevrolet Volt range-extended electric car, the electric range may not be continuous--the plug-in Prius will switch on its engine at any point it needs more power than the batteries can deliver. The EPA hasn't yet rated the Prius Plug-In Hybrid, and like all blended plug-in hybrids, its real-world mileage will depend entirely on how much it's used in all-electric mode.

Sunday, 27 November 2011

2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser

If head-turning style and true trail toughness are priorities, the 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser stands above most SUVs—although families and city commuters need not apply.See What the
Rest of the Web Says We've gathered reviews from Edmunds.com, Cars.com plus live Tweets on this car. See What We Found »

The Toyota FJ Cruiser has changed very little since its introduction five years ago, and during that time the range of serious off-road-worthy models hasn't changed much. Hummer is now gone, and Jeep has honed its Wrangler, but the FJ Cruiser remains one of the better bets for off-road toughness and trail prowess.

The FJ blends retro and contemporary so well that its design should be quite ageless. Looking a bit like a vintage 1960s-era FJ40, crossed with modern cues from the 4Runner and Land Cruiser, with a MINI Cooper-like edge, the FJ Cruiser looks ripe for the trail, yet like a stylish accessory that would make as much of a statement parked in front of an outdoor outfitter as in front of Urban Outfitters. Inside, the appointments are intentionally stark, with body-colored panels and simple gauges and sturdy switchgear.

The 2012 FJ Cruiser is built from the sturdy underpinnings of the last-generation Toyota 4Runner, with off-road ability the priority. Especially when considering its shortened wheelbase and additional ground clearance, it shines off-road. Skid plates protect the underbody, and components are tucked into frame rails. On the trail, you'll find good wheel articulation, without making too much of a sacrifice on-road, and the FJ's approach and departure angles and water-fording depth (27.5 inches) are better than other stock vehicles.

Considering that, on-road performance isn't quite the afterthought you'd expect. The FJ does quite well, even on the highway, provided the path is relatively straight, but in any corners its height, tall tires, and hefty 4,300-pound curb weight get in the way of any attempt to change direction quickly. Its 260-horspower, 4.0-liter V-6 provides strong performance from a standing start, whether with the five-speed automatic or six-speed manual, though it's not as quick on the highway.

For carrying backseat passengers, or for ride comfort on long trips, there are far better choices. In short, the back seat is just too cramped, and getting in and out is a challenge for some due to the high step up and narrow opening from the rear-hinged back doors. You won't find the settled, sophisticated ride quality or quiet, refined interior here, either. All FJ Cruiser models include a good set of interior comforts, along with the bones for real off-road ability, but packages and options help boost the off-road credentials—there's some scruffiness and a hint of military-grade here, and it's intentional.

Safety is relatively strong among off-roaders; the FJ Cruiser hasn't been rated by the federal government, but it achieves mostly 'good' ratings from the IIHS. The side-curtain airbags are roll-sensing and tied with the stability control to work preemptively.

Serious off-road equipment includes an A-TRAC active-traction system, a special multi-information display (inclinometer, compass, temperature), big BF Goodrich Rugged Trail tires, Bilstein shock absorbers, a Cyclone air precleaner, and 115V/400V power outlets. Last year Toyota increased the FJ Cruiser's standard tech features, adding iPod connectivity and XM satellite radio, in addition to a USB port, Bluetooth audio streaming, and a Bluetooth hands-free system with steering-wheel controls.

Handsomely retro designStylish, back-to-basics interiorNo-compromises trail abilityDocile enough for daily drivingLack of maneuverabilityPoor visibilityDifficult backseat accessNoisy highway cruising

View the original article here

Sunday, 13 November 2011

2012 Toyota RAV4

See What the
Rest of the Web Says We've gathered reviews from Edmunds.com, Cars.com plus live Tweets on this car. See What We Found »

Of all the modern compact crossover models for 2012, the Toyota RAV4 remains one of the better picks its size for daily family-hauling needs. But looking at its conservative, traditional, faux-rugged SUV appearance, you might not expect that at all.

That's because the RAV4's design is an odd conglomeration of what SUVs were and where they're going, in terms of both style and layout; the design—with the spare tire hanging on a side-opening hatch—seemed a little confused when this generation was first launched for 2006. While the interior layout and roofline are along the same lines as those of fresh crossover designs, most of the RAV4 lineup also still bows to the most rugged SUV designs that were popular a decade or more ago—including that spare tire.

Although the RAV4 doesn't seem modern in appearance, it's fully up to class rivals in performance. The base 179-horsepower, 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine is smooth, responsive, and has enough power to keep most drivers happy, while a 269-hp, 3.5-liter V-6 remains optional; as such, it has the ability to sprint with hot-rod-like authority or pull off astonishingly quick passes. All RAV4 models come with an automatic transmission—four-speed with the four-cylinder, five-speed with the V-6. In either case, the RAV4 is offered with either front- or four-wheel drive. The optional AWD system uses electronic control to send power rearward when slippage in front is detected, and offers a true 50/50 fixed power split with a 4WD Lock mode.

For such a tall, soft-riding vehicle, the 2012 Toyota RAV4 handles surprisingly well, yet its ride is by no means harsh. The interior of the 2010 Toyota RAV4 features an attractive two-tier instrument panel, good seats, a nice upright driving position, and plenty of storage spaces. 

The RAV4 teeters between compact and mid-size, but in any case, it's one of the few vehicles of its stature to offer a third-row seat. The third row officially expands the RAV4's capacity to seven, but you certainly won't have much luck trying to get adults to ride in the RAV4's third row. For that, you'll need to move up to the larger Highlander. But the seat design doesn't eat up much if any cargo space; when they're not occupied by children, they stow nicely in a recessed area of the cargo floor. Small third row seats and cheapish interior materials are about all there is not to like inside. Otherwise, well designed seating, good seating comfort, and top-notch assembly quality, along with a tight, quiet cabin, the RAV4 has covers all the bases.

Three different trims of the 2012 Toyota RAV4 are offered—each with a choice of the four or V-6—so families are covered in seeking a RAV4 that's right, ranging from basic and fuel-efficient to luxurious or sporty and powerful. The base model includes a Lexus-like electroluminescent instrument panel, remote keyless entry, a tilt/telescoping steering wheel, power mirrors, three 12-volt outlets, ten cup holders, and cruise control. The top Limited model can be optioned like a luxury model, with leather seating areas, heated front seats, and the SUV-requisite rear seat DVD entertainment system to keep the kids entertained.

For 2012, sound systems have been completely revamped, and all models now include Bluetooth hands-free connectivity. With the new Display Audio systems, Bluetooth music streaming is also included, while in Limited models HD Radio with iTunes tagging, text-to-voice capability, and XM satellite radio are added. Also wrapped in is Toyota's Entune suite of services, with a range of data services and apps like Pandora streaming.

If you choose the right model, you can do without the external spare; a Sport Appearance Package remains available, creating a more carlike silhouette by deleting it. Just that one change, combined with some other minor changes, make the RAV4 look much more like the crossover wagon it is.


View the original article here

2012 Toyota Matrix

The 2012 Toyota Matrix combines the frugality of the best-selling Corolla with a little more sportiness and versatility--but it still comes up a bit short in features. See What the
Rest of the Web Says We've gathered reviews from Edmunds.com, Cars.com plus live Tweets on this car. See What We Found »

The 2012 Toyota Matrix is closely related to the Corolla sedan, but the Matrix takes a different tack in terms of style and packaging--appealing to a somewhat younger, more active crowd and those who need more versatility.

Last year the Matrix was up for a mid-cycle refresh, but it amounted to some very minor appearance and trim changes. While Toyota had pitched the Matrix as more of a crossover in its first generation, the current Matrix has a lower sportier stance that's not all that much different from the Corolla from the front. Yet the Matrix's rather high-shouldered sides and prominent, thick rear pillar five it a very different look from all other angles. Inside, the instrument panel is a little swoopier and sportier in appearance, the tall-hatchback layout affords good interior space, and with the Matrix's versatile layout and seats that fold easily (and flat) to expand cargo space, you'll have no problem freeing up seating space for an especially large load of groceries.

The Matrix model lineup consists of base and S models, with base models getting a 132-horsepower, 1.8-liter four-cylinder engine and S models stepping up to a 158-hp, 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine. Between the two, we think most shoppers will be happy with the 1.8-liter, as the 2.4-liter is quite a bit thirstier--especially in all-wheel-drive (S AWD) form. A five-speed manual is standard with either engine, but the available automatic has only four speeds with the 1.8-liter (five with the 2.4-liter) which can make the smaller engine seem sluggish in some situations. All-wheel drive is only available on the S model, and even there, only with automatic. Fuel economy ranges from 26 mpg city, 32 highway for the base model with the manual down to 21/29 for the S AWD.

While the Matrix is very versatile, with the back seat folding fully flat, the seats themselves are a little less supportive than most would probably prefer. Ride quality is pretty good, but road noise can be an issue. Some might also find the rather narrow window openings at the back to severely impair visibility.

The Matrix has earned respectable safety ratings, with top 'good' ratings from the IIHS in frontal and side impact (the related Corolla sedan is a Top Safety Pick). Like nearly all other vehicles in this class, front side and side-curtain airbags are included, as are anti-lock brakes and electronic stability control.

The Matrix is priced above the Corolla, but it isn't trying to be completely basic transportation in the same way, either. The base model comes with power windows and mirrors, air conditioning, and cruise control, while the S model adds fog lamps, keyless entry, and an upgraded sound system. A Sport Package is available on the S, and it includes 17-inch alloy wheels, a rear spoiler, and body skirting. But many shoppers will be disappointed to find out that a Bluetooth hands-free interface is only offered in the S model; step up to the Premium Package on S models and you get Bluetooth audio streaming, a USB input, and full iPod connectivity with a sound-system upgrade. Interior versatilityComfortable rideManeuverabilityHigher-mpg than a utility vehicleLimited cargo space (seats up)Rearward visibilityRoad noiseBare-bones interior trims

View the original article here

2012 Toyota Highlander

See What the
Rest of the Web Says We've gathered reviews from Edmunds.com, Cars.com plus live Tweets on this car. See What We Found »

The 2012 Toyota Highlander is one of the best-selling vehicles with a third-row seat, and it's easy to see why. For a base price of well under $30,000, the very substantial Highlander offers lots of usable space, a comfortable ride, and most of the features busy parents want. And for some extra loot, the Hybrid model brings fuel economy figures approaching 30 mpg to this big utility vehicle.

The Highlander got just a little larger but clearly stepped up a size class when it was last redesigned, for 2008, moving up from the likes of the Ford Edge to true three-row crossovers such as the Chevrolet Traverse. But big and bland are the operative words; even in that the Highlander remains one of the more anonymous entrants. It has sleek, somewhat rounded sheetmetal, but it's a bit slab-sided and far from voluptuous. The front-end now fits in more clearly with Toyota's cars like the Camry and Venza, and its rear styling is much cleaner than the cluttered, spare-tire-adorned RAV4. Inside, the Highlander's cabin appointments appear downright drab in many of its guises; but it arguably feels better than it looks.

There are essentially three powertrains available on the 2012 Highlander. Its base four-cylinder produces 187 horsepower, and it does just fine with front-wheel drive and a six-speed automatic. While it can deal alright with heavier loads, too, fuel economy isn't stellar. The same is true of the much more lusty 270-horsepower, 3.5-liter V-6 Highlander--though the five-speed automatic seems to take some wind out of it. EPA ratings are all mid-pack for all Highlanders save for the Hybrid model. With an engine displacement now at 3.5 liters, and net horsepower 280 hp for the hybrid system, this model is the way to go for those who want something very big, yet green: fuel economy bumps up to 28/28 mpg.

As for the driving experience, don't expect much from it. All of the Highlander models tend to lull you into simply setting the cruise control and conversing with passengers; it's very softly sprung, and the electric power steering tends to be light—too much so, we've observed, on the highway. The optional four-wheel-drive system does give it a chance at slogging through a muddy driveway, deep snow, or rutted trails; Highlander Hybrid models get a different AWD system that uses electric motor power exclusively at the rear wheels.

The 2012 Highlander looks big from the outside, and it delivers on that impression inside. Even bigger adults will fit in the second row—and that seat has a clever middle seat that stows inside the front console when not needed, leaving a walk-through to the third-row seat. No adult will want to sit in that third row for more than a few miles, but the space is large enough for children to feel comfortable.

Those concerned about safety won't have anything to worry about here. The Highlander has been named a Top Safety Pick from the IIHS, with top scores in all categories, and it gets a mix of four- and five-star ratings in the tougher new federal tests. The roster of safety features is up to par in this class, too, with downhill assist control and hill-start assist on AWD models.

Three trim levels are offered for non-Hybrid Toyota Highlander models: base, SE, and Limited. All have cruise control, power features, and a third-row seat. A 3.5-inch multifunction display, satellite radio and USB port are added in the SE, while the Limited gets leather-trimmed power seats. Base and Limited trims apply to Highlander Hybrid models, with equipment roughly in synch. A power moonroof, a navigation system, sound-system upgrades, and a power tailgate are among the many option possibilities that can potentially drive the bottom-line price up by thousands.


View the original article here

Saturday, 12 November 2011

2012 Toyota 4Runner

See What the
Rest of the Web Says We've gathered reviews from Edmunds.com, Cars.com plus live Tweets on this car. See What We Found »

In the 1990s and even earlier last decade, the Toyota 4Runner occupied a place in the market that was very much mainstream. But as most families shoppers moved over to safer, more comfortable, and more efficient car-based designs (like Toyota's own Highlander), Toyota kept the 4Runner tough and very much a truck—relegating it to niche status.

For 2012, the 4Runner enters its third year since a complete redesign (for 2010) that again kept its toughness intact, and placed an even greater emphasis on off-road ability. Styling remains unchanged; with that redesign, the 4Runner became higher, chunkier, and more rugged, with a higher beltline and more flared wheel wells. While inheriting some of the imposing appearance from the Sequoia and Tundra full-size trucks, the 4Runner sticks to more of a conservative, traditional SUV look toward the rear, with a wide, downward-sloping C-pillar looking to past generations of the 4Runner.

Overall, the 2012 Toyota 4Runner drives much better—and more athletically—than its trail-crawling appearance might suggest. Steering feel and maneuverability are unexpected delights in the 4Runner; at low speeds especially, the 4Runner handles with better precision and control than you might expect from such a big, heavy model, and visibility isn't bad. But you'll be reminded you're in a tall vehicle with soft sidewalls and a safe suspension calibration if you attack corners too quickly.

A 4.0-liter V-6 engine, makes 270 horsepower and 278 pound-feet of torque, and feels plenty quick either off the line or at highway speeds. V-6 SR5 models are offered either with rear-wheel drive or a part-time four-wheel-drive system, while Trail models are only offered with that 4WD system. Limited models get a separate full-time four-wheel-drive system that's more road-oriented.

In Trail grade (the off-road model), the 4Runner includes a host of electronics and systems meant to complement the sturdy off-road hardware. Base models can be a little pitchy on rough pavement, but Limited models get yet another setup: a so-called X-REAS system with electronically adjusting dampers, geared for flatter cornering and pavement surfaces. The Kinetic Dynamic Suspension System (KDSS) that's optional in the Trail model uses hydraulics to reduce motions on-road or increase off-road traction and riding comfort, with more wheel travel in that situation.

You won't find the 4Runner to be quite as roomy inside as less trucklike options such as the Honda Pilot or Ford Flex, but it's up to par in comfort for the first two rows of seating. Front seats are wide and supportive—they look and feel great with the available perforated leather upholstery—and the driving position is excellent. In the second row, which adjusts for rake, adult-sized occupants will also feel at home. The third row is only good for kids—and hard to get to.

But as decent as the 4Runner is for passengers, it's disappointing for cargo and overall versatility. The flip-forward folding third row is easy enough to use, but the body is rather narrow and the cargo floor is quite high.

The way the 4Runner's controls are arranged—and the feel of them—is a highlight of its interior. Off-road-focused controls are located in an overhead console, keeping the center stack of controls straightforward and accessible, with large buttons and knobs that have a great tactile feel. A secondary display sits atop the center stack, and redundant steering wheel controls access audio and Bluetooth functions. The instrument panel and door trim build on the fundamentals seen in the Tundra pickup and Sequoia SUV, but with better attention to detail. It's macho and utilitarian, but the chunky center stack and easy-to-read gauge cluster highlight a macho, utilitarian look and common-sense simplicity.

All 4Runners also come with eight standard airbags, including front side bags, side-curtain bags for the second and third rows, and front knee bags for the driver and passenger. Some include a small screen built into the rearview mirror that provides a fish-eye camera view backward for parking assistance. Safety Connect, a system that's similar to General Motors' OnStar, is available. About the only safety blemish is an only 'acceptable' IIHS roof strength score.

Base 4Runner SR5 models start just below $30k and actually include a good level of equipment; but the off-road purists who also sometimes need to haul the family will want the Trail model, which includes all the off-road goodies plus upgraded audio, a USB port, iPod connectivity, and Bluetooth audio streaming. Top Limited models step up to 15-speaker JBL premium sound, with a Party Mode that biases output to the rear tailgate speakers. Paired with the optional pull-out rear cargo deck, it's an instant tailgate party. 

New to the Limited for 2012 (and optional on other models), the 4Runner gets redesigned audio systems, plus Toyota's Entune services and HD Radio with iTunes tagging.


View the original article here

Friday, 11 November 2011

Comparison: 2011 Hyundai Sonata SE 2.0T vs 2012 Toyota Camry SE V-6 vs 2012 Volkswagen Passat VR6 SEL

the current Passat has nothing to do with the old one. People are claiming the old Passat was a POS (no proof is being offered) and thus MT should rank this one lower. That is nonsense. We know NOTHING about the reliability of the new Passat and whose to say reliability should be the #1 factor? Cars have warranties for a reason and some folks lease cars and thus could care less about 100k mile durability. This is NOT a ranking of potential reliability or maintenance costs. In fact, none of the major magazines/sites take reliability into account when ranking cars. Think people, how many years has Camry been number 1?  How many years has Toyota made reliable cars in every category, and the reverse, VW made unreliable cars in every category?

Now we are to believe a first year transplant, made in America car that is dumbed down for America, with an older technology engine that is not even sold in other VWs much longer, and is imported to America not even built here, and then inserted into the VW, is better than a homegrown entirely made in America Camry.

Let me tell you, every time that oxygen sensor light comes on, every time the rattles in the dashboard drive you nuts, every time the heater coil breaks in zero degree temperature and radiator coolant leaks, and every time you realize no corner Good Year or Firestone is able or willing to touch this low tech VW, you would hate the moment you made a decision to purchase it.

To compare a VW Passat in any trim to a Camry and proclaim it a better car in  its first year, is the height of irresponsibility

Just FYI for those complaining about the price difference for Sonata...

As someone already mentioned, the trim level tested does not have Navi or leather interior for beginners. Who knows? Maybe this was way of Hyundai saying "Hey, at least we're selling it cheap!" You don't compare Hyundai to VW. It is only a matter of time before Hyundai is exposed for their style over substance approach.

BD,

I don't know what you mean by the VW was slowest BY FAR in all the other tests. Hm, let's see. It lost from 0-30 and 0-40 but then the Camry starts losing ground and is overall beat by the VW in the quarter mile but we'll say it was basically a tie.  Then we check everything else. Figure 8, lateral gs and breaking is one pretty easily by the V dub. after all the stats which show the Passat fastest not just in a straight line (call it a tie fine) but around the bends (this time definitely  beating both competitors) we look at the road test.  It didn't sound to me like MT had any trouble deciding who won in everything in that test.  Ride comfort, refinement, enjoyment to drive, quality, everything.   And the interior is by far better especially compared to the clearly cheap toyota's.  So you put that all together with VW's new rep for quality and Toyota's new rep of not-so-great quality then you understand the price difference.  You pay for a better car and its worth it compared to outdated cheap and bring

"Toyota isn't losing sleep over Passat.  They may not even know it's been redesigned....."

Hopefully they'll sleep right up until the end.

BD,

Quote from the article

Away from the test track, the Passat VR6 didn't lose any luster. Over our 30-mile drive loop, we scored it the highest in ride, road feel, refinement, and roominess.

BD,

What part of "fun to drive" don't you understand? This has been a factor in all 3 comparisons.

@GT-keith

Which is why I really think they should consider using an Optima next time. I also recently spent time in a rental Sonata (445 miles in 7 days), as well as a rental Optima (1463 miles in 11 days) and the Optima was a better experience all around. I didn't have any violent shaking issues in the Sonata (and it had almost 30,000 on the odo), but it still didn't provide as good of an experience.

Congratulations to Volkswagen for listening to the public and taking a huge risk in building a car that was sure to alienate some longtime VW buyers but might turn out to be a hit with the general public.

And kudos to Motor trend for putting the Passat in this comparison in the first place, and having the guts to call it like they see it.

Seems the ringers Hyundai likes to throw at comparisons didn't make it to this one. That is why we see these times and the true driving dynamics, or should I say lack there of, and near bottom FE.

Poor fanboys can't accept the truth. Which is, Hyundai, and their cheerleaders over hype the products.

First of all, these times appear to be from automatics and the Pasat and Camry put up some super impressive straight line times.  I think that Camry has the superior engine but VW has the superior transmission.  If a Camry handled anything close to a VW, it would be my choice of the bunch given Toyota's well-deserved reputation for reliability.  Then again, if you drive a VW, they are easy to fall in love with.  How else could VW still be in business with all of the reliability gremlins they have had with virtually every car after the original, rock-solid reliability Beetle.

I think what is lost is how unimpressive the 2.0T from Hyundai is.  I think MT was overly kind on the handling dynamics of the 2.0T.  It has the WORST handling feel of any car in this segment.  If anything, the 2.0T throws of the balance of the car and makes an already suspect handling car have a handling feel that is like driving a poor handling bumper car.

VR
Just point out the multiple errors and hypocrisy

Fortunately, few people are dumb enough to buy a VW as a daily driver, so if VW sells 125k next year, especially after the new Malibu, Altima and Accord have their say, they should throw some type of over-the-top celebration.

Toyota isn't losing sleep over Passat.  They may not even know it's been redesigned.....
BD

@BD

If there's a bigger wiener out there, I've yet to meet him. All you do is complain.

Hey, did you hear that VW is going to be the largest automaker by the end of the year? Yup, you heard right. Toyota dropped behind VW AND GM this year. They're boring, and as MotorTrend noted in this comparison test, the Camry isn't as awesome as it used to be.

It's funny, all the negativity about VW reliability. Give me a break. You're all just pissed that this "inferior" car has bested the untouchable Camry.

I don't get what MT's obsession with the Hyundai Sonata is for all their comparisons, especially when they can't even bother to get a fully loaded one that competes more directly with the Passat they used.

You'd think they'd just use the Kia Optima they have in their long term fleet. It's fully loaded, turbocharged, and the general consensus among auto journalists is that it's a better car than the Sonata anyway. The fact that they get subpar 0-60 times in either vehicle seems to only be a problem they have. Something strange is going on here. I actually like the new Passat and Camry, but it seems MT is not going all in with their third player.

JeremyJames86 - Today 10:54 AM

I agree with everyone on the west coast waking up 4 hours after New Jersey.

$33K you get get a lot better rides than a veedub:
- Infiniti G Sedan
- Cadillac CTS Sport Sedan
- Lexus ES350

well... fella, you'd end up with a stripped one.

Had to point out a clear error in the article:

"Add that to its being the quickest and most fun to drive, and you have is a sedan unmatched in its class."

Clearly, the Camry matched it in speed.  It beat the Passat to 30 MPH, and to 100MPH, and matched it in the quarter, so Passat cannot be considered  "unmatched" if the Camry ran with the more expensive car step-for-step.

The Passat IS unmatched in price, efficiency, and value.  The Camry and Sonata had better MPG at much lower costs, presenting much better values to the consumer.......
BD

Who is impressed by a car $6-8k more expensive only matching the best performance, and losing in MPG?

Is value a factor or not (Again, we are talking about family sedans)?  Isn't that what a family is looking for in a V6 family sedan?  Is THAT the car they would choose?  Is THAT the car you would recommend?

Oh........
BD

@jeremy:

The cars you mentioned start around $37k and the CTS has 270ho for that amount. While you can get some luxury models in the $33k range- they wont be loaded and they wont have 280hp. The Passat is loaded for that amount of money.

How come people have trouble understanding that MT cannot always get the exact model they want? All the mags complain about this when staging comparos. You have to take what is available from the manufacturers. I also dont get all the comments saying "how can a VW Passat be ranked over a Camry?". What rule sales a VW cant beat a Toyota? If the Passat was the most impressive in this trio than it should be ranked #1.

Agreed with Church123

It's like MT went to the same deceptive marketing seminar as GM did.

It is clear now that the Camry is the true winner of all 3 comparos.

1. Base Model test:  Camry outperformed all
2. Hybrid/Diesel MPG:  Camry wins again
3. Performance:  Camry is on par with Passat for less and is the most efficient

I like how MT selectively mentions items only when the Passat is better.  Like figure-8 times.  When the Passat was better it gets top billing, but when the Camry (in hybrid trim) was quicker around the figure-8, not a mention anywhere.

Or how an entry level, everyman's Camry gets compared to Passat SE and is criticized for having too soft a ride and not enough grip (M+S tires vs. summer tires on the Passat), then the Camry SE (sport package for intenders) is cricized for being too stiff.

And of course, no mention that the Passat V6 is dramatically more expensive and less fuel efficient than the Camry.

Don't get me wrong, if I'm looking at a top of the line V6 sedan, a mpg or two deficit isn't going to be as important to me as some of the other things the Passat has going for it.  Of these three comparisons, the Passat winning the V6 category makes the most sense to me.  But after your selective memory on the first two tests where the Camry was superior you're going to get called out for your inconsistency

I agree with everyone on the west coast waking up 4 hours after New Jersey.

$33K you get get a lot better rides than a veedub:
- Infiniti G Sedan
- Cadillac CTS Sport Sedan
- Lexus ES350

I didn't even bother reading this one.
I know who's pocket MT is in now.......

Passat is only $6-8k more expensive.
A hell of a value for a family sedan!
BD

Obviously Hyundai is over estimating their 0-60 and horsepower ratings to trick people into buying their product. False Advertising, just like the review articles from motor magazines/journalists.

I've driven a rental sonata. Its kinda of rough when accelerating driving and braking. Interior is not as refined either. Now that the sonata have had some real world testing. The flaws are being reported from the consumers.

Gotta love the "VW isn't reliable" slander from all the Toyota fans. That VR6 is a killer engine, just as reliable as the other two in this test. I'm surprised the article didn't mention how glorious the exhaust note is.

I'm shocked at how slow the 2.0T is. But then again, it's not the engine's fault. The Sonata is geared for optimal fuel economy (35mpg highway). Drop in some premium fuel and give it some better gear ratios and this would be a much quicker car. I'd love to see Hyundai/Kia give this engine a chance in a different car purpose-built for speed.

@benff:

Mags often cannot get press cars equipped EXACTLY as they want. This is nothing new. They have to use the press cars provided. I dont think this comparo was based on features. Sonata is a nice car, but its competition has been refreshed. Everyone is in such awe of Hyundai that now people get mad if a Hyundai isnt seen as the benchmark in any given category. Sonata is now 3rd oldest midsizer on the market and after Malibu comes out it will be 4th oldest. Its hard to stay on top when your competition is so determined.

Short article for a 3 Car Comparison...

Until VW fixes it's issues (and stops under styling), I won't be buying one.

Hyundai must be overrating their mpg and horsepower numbers lately.  The real world data proves it.  Even the old 2006 Sonata V6 with only 235 hp posted 0-60 in 6.8 seconds and weighed 200 pounds more.

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/112_0512_family_sedan_comparison/specs_prices.html

These last few VW articles have hindered Hyundai significantly (as well as Toyota).  I am seeing much better numbers in every other site (usually averaging low 6s for the 2.0t). MT, I am loosing faith in you, this seems to blatant of a VW advertisement.  Nothing wrong with the VW, but in the past three articles, it's a bit much.  

I call shenanigans!


View the original article here

Tuesday, 8 November 2011

2012 Toyota 4Runner

See What the
Rest of the Web Says We've gathered reviews from Edmunds.com, Cars.com plus live Tweets on this car. See What We Found »

In the 1990s and even earlier last decade, the Toyota 4Runner occupied a place in the market that was very much mainstream. But as most families shoppers moved over to safer, more comfortable, and more efficient car-based designs (like Toyota's own Highlander), Toyota kept the 4Runner tough and very much a truck—relegating it to niche status.

For 2012, the 4Runner enters its third year since a complete redesign (for 2010) that again kept its toughness intact, and placed an even greater emphasis on off-road ability. Styling remains unchanged; with that redesign, the 4Runner became higher, chunkier, and more rugged, with a higher beltline and more flared wheel wells. While inheriting some of the imposing appearance from the Sequoia and Tundra full-size trucks, the 4Runner sticks to more of a conservative, traditional SUV look toward the rear, with a wide, downward-sloping C-pillar looking to past generations of the 4Runner.

Overall, the 2012 Toyota 4Runner drives much better—and more athletically—than its trail-crawling appearance might suggest. Steering feel and maneuverability are unexpected delights in the 4Runner; at low speeds especially, the 4Runner handles with better precision and control than you might expect from such a big, heavy model, and visibility isn't bad. But you'll be reminded you're in a tall vehicle with soft sidewalls and a safe suspension calibration if you attack corners too quickly.

A 4.0-liter V-6 engine, makes 270 horsepower and 278 pound-feet of torque, and feels plenty quick either off the line or at highway speeds. V-6 SR5 models are offered either with rear-wheel drive or a part-time four-wheel-drive system, while Trail models are only offered with that 4WD system. Limited models get a separate full-time four-wheel-drive system that's more road-oriented.

In Trail grade (the off-road model), the 4Runner includes a host of electronics and systems meant to complement the sturdy off-road hardware. Base models can be a little pitchy on rough pavement, but Limited models get yet another setup: a so-called X-REAS system with electronically adjusting dampers, geared for flatter cornering and pavement surfaces. The Kinetic Dynamic Suspension System (KDSS) that's optional in the Trail model uses hydraulics to reduce motions on-road or increase off-road traction and riding comfort, with more wheel travel in that situation.

You won't find the 4Runner to be quite as roomy inside as less trucklike options such as the Honda Pilot or Ford Flex, but it's up to par in comfort for the first two rows of seating. Front seats are wide and supportive—they look and feel great with the available perforated leather upholstery—and the driving position is excellent. In the second row, which adjusts for rake, adult-sized occupants will also feel at home. The third row is only good for kids—and hard to get to.

But as decent as the 4Runner is for passengers, it's disappointing for cargo and overall versatility. The flip-forward folding third row is easy enough to use, but the body is rather narrow and the cargo floor is quite high.

The way the 4Runner's controls are arranged—and the feel of them—is a highlight of its interior. Off-road-focused controls are located in an overhead console, keeping the center stack of controls straightforward and accessible, with large buttons and knobs that have a great tactile feel. A secondary display sits atop the center stack, and redundant steering wheel controls access audio and Bluetooth functions. The instrument panel and door trim build on the fundamentals seen in the Tundra pickup and Sequoia SUV, but with better attention to detail. It's macho and utilitarian, but the chunky center stack and easy-to-read gauge cluster highlight a macho, utilitarian look and common-sense simplicity.

All 4Runners also come with eight standard airbags, including front side bags, side-curtain bags for the second and third rows, and front knee bags for the driver and passenger. Some include a small screen built into the rearview mirror that provides a fish-eye camera view backward for parking assistance. Safety Connect, a system that's similar to General Motors' OnStar, is available. About the only safety blemish is an only 'acceptable' IIHS roof strength score.

Base 4Runner SR5 models start just below $30k and actually include a good level of equipment; but the off-road purists who also sometimes need to haul the family will want the Trail model, which includes all the off-road goodies plus upgraded audio, a USB port, iPod connectivity, and Bluetooth audio streaming. Top Limited models step up to 15-speaker JBL premium sound, with a Party Mode that biases output to the rear tailgate speakers. Paired with the optional pull-out rear cargo deck, it's an instant tailgate party. 

New to the Limited for 2012 (and optional on other models), the 4Runner gets redesigned audio systems, plus Toyota's Entune services and HD Radio with iTunes tagging.


View the original article here

Monday, 7 November 2011

Comparison: 2011 Hyundai Sonata Hybrid vs 2012 Toyota Camry Hybrid XLE vs. 2012 Volkswagen Passat TDI SE

I generally like MT articles and their knowledge but feel there must be a mistake here. I test drove a sonata hybrid (it was a manager's special car with 800 miles on the odo) and the car was a dealership car which had returned from a 100 mile trip. The trip computer on the dash (it was the base version) said 40.6 mpg average and the manager looked heavy-set and far from being a hypermiling kind of guy.

"To the poster who said Hyundai interiors were plasticky". I found them personally to be on par or better than my Lexus and the gauges, materials were first rate, more often seen on 35K plus cars.

I would really want MT to retest a different Sonata hybrid because the numbers do not seem accurate from other road tests I have read (or) my personal experience at the dealership??

For example 123autocanada got 37mpg on a lead foot

http://www.auto123.com/en/news/car-news/past-topics/sonata-hybrid?topic=sonata+hybrid

@suparag9

If all you (and MT) care about are the feelings of the drive then you (and MT) are not qualified to comment about these cars.  Let's face it, all these cars ARE "appliances."  

The Camry though, is the proven reliable appliance.

a couple of points:
1. diesel stinkiness refers to your hands when you refuel it, the exhaust is pretty clean.

2. Toyota HSD hybrid tech is as reliable as possible for a car to get.. no belts, no clutches, no transmission, no starter, no alternator, no water pump, no turbo and no direct fuel injection.. and its very likely the brake pads will last 100k miles. The Hyundai tech is new and unproven.. VW TDI reliability and maintenance issues are scary after 5 years, these new diesels (2005-present) are very complicated and have expensive maintenance.. fuel quality is extremely critical with the common rail high pressure fuel pumps.

@Inyurahsya,

VW won because it is a "Car" and for the driver, it is a pleasure to "drive" it.

Camry did not win because it is an "appliance" and for the driver, if he/she is awake, try to avoid the boredom with some tunes..

@lions208487, I guess you have never driven newer VW's and seems your opinions are based on cars more than two decades ago.

I drive a 2006 VW Jetta TDI with 186K miles, I have not had any oil leaks, or oil sludge. As far as you put in oil that meets VW specs, you have no issues. At 50K miles the diesel engines are just breaking in.

I wanted to hear this many "feelings", I'd watch the next episode of "The View".
MT's testosterone is a quart low.  And it's mascara is running.

Tell me how it "feels" when the VW's check engine light comes on next week....
BD

I would prefer to wait for the new Altima and Fusion Hybrid before a true comparison test can be made. However, even though Toyota is not my preference by any means, the Camry obviously is the true winner here.

As syj states, it's not all about 0-60 and MPG, but the Camry dominated in both so that deserve recognition. Since Fuel economy is the primary purpose for a hybrid, the Camry wins. Interior and exterior appearence is in the eye of the buyer, I personally would take the Camry over the VW. Despite Toyota's recall issues in the prior two years, they still make a much more reliable car than any VW product period. Intake valve, oil sludge, oil leaks tend to become a common problems with VW's after 50K miles. C/R and JDP consistantly list VW's issues with every years reliability test, and VW is always near the bottom. That alone is reason to go for the Hyundai or Toyota.

"church
That beats Haley's Comet
BD"

Oh, I show up a little more often than that.  But when I do, I'm right.  Try again :P

Round 1: Base Model
"In terms of power, interior space, useability, and fuel economy, the Camry's the best here."  But the Passat is better because it felt better and won.

Round 2: Hybrids/Diesel(MPG)
The camry got 36.9 MPG; the Passat got 34.3 but is better because it felt better and won.

Let me guess...
Round 3: "High Octane" versions
The Camry and Sonata whooped the Passat but the Passat is better because it felt better and won.

Why even have these tests?

Adamlink
I forgot, you do everything someone tells you.  You fall for every line
You definitely are the bend-over-and-take-it type......

You didn't read the article, just the final paragraph
But having someone read it for you kind of proves the point.....
BD

All kidding aside, and the fanboyism, I think some people here are misunderstanding what MT was trying to do in this comparison.

This comparison was not purely about gas mileage.  If it was, the Focus SFE would have been included, because it gets 40 MPG on the highway.  (Or the Fusion hybrid, etc.)  It also wasn't meant to be a comparison of ALL the midsize contenders out there . . . because it just isn't practical to test 15 vehicles!

They took the current bestseller (the Camry), the hot newcomer (the Sonata), and a recently redesigned oldtimer, and tried to find out which was the best CAR . . . overall.  Price, value, economy, handling, quality, etc.  

MT praised each of these cars for their various attributes and criticized each one, as well.  I think they were pretty fair.  In the end it wasn't like one car was a total turd and the others were made of gold . . . each car did very well.  Can you please everybody?  Don't think so.

As a VW fan I'm just glad we were invited to the party this year.  

Sorry, Gatt!

(You should try being a Redskins fan.)

BD,

Please do not spill your pollution over to MotorTrend. Keep it to the hot heads and children on Autoblog and LeftLaneNews. We actually enjoy real conversation on this site.

To Black Dynamite and all the others on the Toyota payroll . . .

You're absolutely right.  The Camry actually won these two comparisons.

And the Redskins actually beat the Carolina Panthers this past Sunday.  The scoreboard must have been wrong.

A couple of misconceptions.  1.  VW does have hybrid technology.  In the next few years you will see both hybrid gas vehicles and hybrid diesel vehicles here in the U.S.

2.  VW didn't go with diesel because it didn't have hybrid technology.  They went with diesel because first, it was proven, second, it has fewer maintenance issues when compared to hybrid, third, it's familiar and widely available, and fourth, when synthetic diesel is developed to its full potential, diesel will cost far LESS than gasoline.

3.  Where I live the price of diesel varies throughout the year.  The most I've seen it is about 20 cents more than gas . . . but I've also seen it 10 cents LESS than gas, depending on the season and availability.

The TDI is not "smelly."  You can stand right by the tailpipe while it's running and not smell a thing.  

You won't see any diesel residue left around the tailpipe on the bumper, either.  In fact, you can run your finger around the inside of the tailpipe and you won't be able to pick up anything.

The TDi is actually cleaner than gasoline in certain particulates, and won the "Green Car of the Year" award when it first came out.

@ pmirp1

If they were comparing hybrids, the TDI would not have been invited and the Camry would likely win.  The Camry's acceleration times are faster than a number of yesteryear's V6s, which is quite impressive.

Then again, there is more to a car than 0-60 and mileage.  To enthusiasts, things like interior comfort, handling, driving dynamics, and plastic texturing are more important than to the average driver.  The Camry appeals to the average driver.  VWs tend to appeal more to enthusiasts, although that is changing a bit.  Based on early reviews, VW seems to have a particularly sweet spot with the Pasat, even if it does have an ugly grille.

There is also the point that hybrids are not the be all and end all to mileage, although it is hard to argue against their superiority in city and stop and go driving.  However, a larger percentage of people drive on highways in most of the country as opposed to 90+% city driving (which is what I do).  The Pasat seems to be the best overall car here.

@blackdynamiteNYC

Camry - 2 wins
Passat and Sonata - 0.0

well said my friend.  WELL SAID

i only add, Ron Kino doesn't know what he is talking about

When the stars are all in alignment, Church123 shows a small, tiny bit of wisdom.

Camry - 2 wins
Passat and Sonata - 0.0
BD

I've driven this sonata and it is not well put together. The interior has left over bits of plastic in it. Lots of hard plastic panels. The engine is rough. The transmission hesitates at 2nd/3rd gear. Maybe if it had a v6 it'll be better.

I haven't driven the new Toyota so i cant comment on that. I have driven the 2010 model. Its pretty smooth. Reminds me of a Lexus ES.

@himoses
The MotorTrend article seems to be only focused on interstate driving.  I mean how many people only drive their cars on the interstate other than editors of MT that have nothing better to do?  

To 99% of population, driving efficiency in the city is what matters.

Why does Motor Trend not state how much better the braking for the Camry has become?  Remember the regenerative braking is a weak spot for all hybrids and now Camry has improved it.

Also, while most observers admit the dual clutch transmission for VW TDI has hesitation tendencies and there are many articles about it on the web, Motor Trend does not say a thing about all those issues.

Motor Trend clearly does not want to go where it should, which is lack of hybrid technology for VW.  VW knows hybridization is expensive, so it leaves that technology for Porsche and expensive SUVs.

Camry gives that technology at its best to masses.
Power to the people, Camry wins outright.

I agree including a Fusion would have been more appropriate for t

As odious as I find it to agree with blackdynamite, he's correct here.

Around town the VW may feel peppy, but out on the highway, the Camry thoroughly crushes it in acceleration - almost 2 seconds faster from 60-80 mph.  That's a huge difference in passing power.

And in that aforementioned around town driving, I'll bet the Camry nearly doubles the Passat's fuel economy, never mind that in the US, 87 octane gas is some 10% cheaper than diesel these days.

And while I can believe that the Passat is more engaging to drive vs. the HSD CVT setup in the Camry and its disconnection between throttle and gas engine operation, if you're looking for a fuel sipper in this class, such engagement is not your top priority.  And in the end, the Camry did beat the Passat around the figure-8 despite narrower, low rolling resistance tires so it isn't like it's slow in the cut and thrust of the real world.

And in the extra passenger room in the Camry, and world class reliability and I think the Camry has to win this class.

@ pmirp1

Have you driven a TDI?  They are hardly smelly.  The comparison was for mileage so diesel belongs as an alternative to a hybrid.  When it comes to city driving, diesels can't touch hybrids.

I would have liked to see the Fusion hybrid thrown in the mix since it has been the best midsize hybrid for the past two model years.

I guess that didn't have the Fusion Hybrid on hand because its not a "new" model like the trio at hand. Perhaps they are waiting for the New Malibu e-Assist/Fusion Hybrid match up next year.

What a shame about the Sonata Hybrid. It shows that as fast as Hyundai has been cranking out models, something was bound to be a screw up. I'm not a Toyota fan by ANY means but I have to give them credit. The Camry is still a contender..even though its still ho hum!

Why compare a Diesel to hybrids?  What logic is there for that?  Other than the fact that Diesels get good gas mileage.

A Diesel has very natural driving tendencies, and does not have to deal with dual technologies that are balanced in a hybrid.  The Diesel does not have a CVT so of-course it feels better and sounds better to drive.

Still, the Camry is easily much faster, more fuel efficient by EPA standards (remember hybrid comes to light in city where most of us drive) and it is made by a company that has tremendous reliability.  

Again this comparison just makes no sense, but by most objective criteria, the Camry wins.   Case closed.

Now throw that smelly Diesel back in the sea or to Europe, where it needs to stay.  America has no infrastructure for Diesel, as the last gas shortages showed.  Do not be fooled

"A salesman at a dealer said they pulled of 700+ miles on one tank. Most of the mpg was achieved on cruise"

A salesperson at a dealer said something highly optimistic about the cars they are selling?  Alert the press!

The low real world MPG is an ongoing this for Hyundai.  This isn't the first time one has underperformed when it comes to MPG.  Sure MT has a heavy foot, but you can't think they were babying the Camry and Passat while just flogging the heck out of the Sonata to produce that result.

@Inyurahsya

Come on man the camry beat it by what 2 mpg in the test. Really is that enough for me to run around with a car that a much lesser drive overall NO!!!!. The Camry did great in this test but its not soooo great that it would win. In a test done by CR it would have one because driving experience doesn't matter to consumer report, but this is motor trend.

Now I could understand if it lost to the hyundai in this test. Now that would be something to be upset about.

Shut up UpstateBD,

VW won.

*** crap lost.

Again, the Camry lost due to driving dynamics when they are testing MPG.  Why did they test the XLE against the TDI SE, WTF?

It's funny how MT calls the Passat 43MPG on highway and yet refers to the Camry LE Hybrid as 41 combined as if to dumb tn down a little.  Way to twist the truth, MT.

@ BlackDynamiteNYC

Get over it. The Passat is better than the Camry.

VRsicks

@slu1979- Cleary you didn't read that they said it a much worse drive the passat all around. I mean come on you thought they'd prefer to drive a CVT over a 6 speed dct. LOL

Anyways the only vehcile missingh was the fusion hybrid even though people are screaming conspiracy about the passat's performance. I can only wonder why the passat is winning in comparisons on other publications too? I guess VW much be paying off everyone.. LOL

Why did they use the Camry XLE, but not the same trim in the Passat (SEL)?  The Camry LE actually gets ANOTHER 2 MPG better than the XLE!  

So IF MT wanted to do this on the square, they would test the right car, or add two MPG and subtract $1500 for the Camry.

So an LE Camry Hybrid would get approx.  38.9 MPG and cost $15 more than the Sonata, and cost $205 LESS than the Passat.

PLUS factor in the penalty for diesel gas.

PLUS this is obviously a highway test, and plays to the diesel's strength, and the diesel still got beat.  If this was equal parts city and highway, it would have been even more of a blowout!

Again, MT strains to find  problem with the Camry to negate it's clearly superior performance, and fails miserably......again.

MT screwed the pooch on back-to-back tests?  WOW!

MT doesn't think much of their reader if they can't expect you to see through this TWICE!

MT, for shame........
BD

Hard to pick a winner between the three biggest sponsors of any automag out there, huh?

Luckily the hideous entry placed last, followed by the kind of hideous and very boring entry, right behind the most boring car in the world.


View the original article here

Saturday, 29 October 2011

First Test: 2012 Toyota Yaris SE

Why even talk about the "improved" acceleration?  The 0-60's were awful on past Yarii because you always tested an antiquated four-speed automatic.  Other magazines who had their hands on manual Yarii pulled off anywhere from 8.5 to 8.9 seconds.

The reality is the SE only performs better where they updated things-- braking and suspension/feeling.  Otherwise it's technically a slower car.  Depending on how many pieces can be mixed-n-matched with the old Yaris, I'd actually consider just buying a used Yaris hatch and throwing on the fun pieces to the lighter, less attention-gobbling package.  It'd likely cost the same to do it, but honestly it just seems more fun than having a factory built SE that I guarantee will be mostly gray-hairs behind the wheel.  Look at half the Scions and Yarii out there that went after the youth market and tell me differently.

Also, if you tested the $17k Yaris SE, why is the price as tested sitting at $15,055? (Fixed.  Thank you.)

Order
That's a pathetic excuse of a post!

What subcompact in the U.S. has a 2.0?
Oh.....

These cars are much lighter than compacts, and don't need larger engines, which would hurt, not help, their EPA.  Pay attention!
BD

pmirp
Well, you're wrong, and that's........ok.

9 seconds 0-60 is normal for this class.  Kia Rio and the base Sonic run that.  Fiesta is the slowest in the class.  And Fiesta is very expensive.  Easy to spend $20k

The base Sonic gets 25/35?  THAT'S not in the same class!

This car is fully competitive with all the new entries, except for the 6-speed.  But it's EPA and speed show it's not needed, just would be that much better to have.
BD

Is Toyota the new GM?

There was a time GM would not spend enough money on development of its smaller cars.

Looking at this Yaris, seeing how the interior is miserable still (though improved on 4th world interior of last year's), no six speed automatic, and not in same class as Sonic, Fiesta or Koreans, makes me believe that Toyota is not investing enough in their compact and sub-compact categories.

That is a shame.  Perhaps they think Prius will become the standard, but that is a very risky line they are running.  A line that lead to bankruptcy for GM, and one that now they are on, without improving their cheaper offerings in a bad economy to same standards as Ford or Koreans or GM

A better Yaris, but for $17k, a 6-speed slushbox should be there.

And that would get it to 40MPG, too.
BD

it looks good. just needs a little more power. i don't know why toyota and honda like 106hp so much. they have been offering cars with 106hp for donkey years!

toyota should make an awd version of this with a 1.6 turbo! wishful thinking lol. it looks like a little rally car. i love it!


View the original article here

Comparison: 2012 Hyundai Sonata GLS vs. 2012 Toyota Camry LE vs. 2012 Volkswagen Passat SE

What I don't understand is how the Sonata, with the most HP and best power to weight ratio, is not faster than the Camry. As well as this, it got by far the worst mileage out of the three, when it should have been closer to the Camry's, if the EPA ratings were accurate. All of Hyundai's new cars seem this way too. They all look the best on paper, but don't work out to real world results. I would never buy a Camry, under any circumstances.  It's just not a good car, in my opinion.

Having said that, nothing in this segment is a Ferrari or a Porsche.  What people want in a midsize is, apparently, an appliance with a little-- just a little-- zing.  I have to give kudos to Hyundai for trying to provide just that.  I think that's why it's polling at #1.  The Passat is also offering a little extra zing with its European style and German handling.  That's why it's #2.  The Camry is pure appliance.  You don't stand in front of your refrigerator and admire it.  You only want it to keep stuff cold.

I thought it was a good and well laid out article.  The Pasat is a nice car.  It looks sharp and the I5 gets dumped on a lot, but it isn't too bad.  The 6-spd Shiftronic is an excellent transmission.  The Pasat has the same power train in my Jetta, is bigger, and is lighter...a good combination.  VW knows how to make their cars fun to drive.

I was kind of surprised to see how much the Camry outperformed the Sonata when comparing automatic to automatic.  If I were to buy a car in this comparison, it would be the Camry or the Sonata.  I have driven the Sonata several times in multiple trim levels and the turbo, and it is an excellent car.  However, its steering feel is bad, but not as bad as last generation's Camry (unless you are talking about the turbo which is even worse).  Also, the seats, while initially comfortable, are too wide and flat to get comfortable for a nice long drive.  Ingress and egress is slighly more difficult, but nothing noticeable.

BD, it's nothing in comparison to the pile of cash you've amassed being wrong.  So far I haven't heard you say one thing that wasn't straight out of the Toyota playbook.

What dealership do you work at?

"Ocellaris..stop living in the past, this is not the early 2000s. VW's quality numbers still lag behind those of Toyota and Hyundai."

People confuse initial quality with long term quality.  I would not argue that VW trails Hyundai in initial quality, however my concern is what happens to the Hyundais 5+ years down the road.

Very few people drive an "old" Hyundai because they didn't last.  I live in the Northeast and less than a decade ago, the roads were positively bursting with people buying new Hyundais they got on the cheap.  There are a few volume Hyundai dealers in the area and they didn't have trouble selling them.  If you look around now, there are still a ton of early 2000s VW on the road and all of the Hyundais are gone and dead.  If you do see one, bumpers are hanging off, the paint is fading and peeling, and the interior is trashed.  People just presume these new Hyundais will last a long time because they look good, and people equate looks with quality.

BD, you're in denial.  The Passat didn't lose this comparison.  It won.  Admit it.

You're also in sales and you work for Toyota.  I'll bet you money on it.

Jetta has lucked out, with the tsunami slowing down Corolla and Civic.  Many companies have benefitted from an Act of God, handicapping the two leaders.  Chevy Cruze as well is a big winner, but it got help.

It's early!  Calm down!  After all the dust has settled, VW will be the bottom-feeders we all know and ignore.

(No matter how hard MT works to get them over.....and this was a work!)

Sonata is a full-size car in EPA, Camry and Passat are midsized.  You need to study....
BD

@BD:

you are such a shill that you dont even understand how success is measured. In the US Toyota is FAR bigger than VW. The fact that VW is now selling 13-15k Jettas a month is a huge win for VW considering their size in this market. Its about marketshare trends- Jetta's is way up and Corollas is down. VW doesnt have the production capacity on lineup size to compete with Toyota in total sales in the US. They dont even make trucks which automatically keeps them on a lower tier in terms of US sales. And BTW, the Jetta has been running at about 75% of the sales of the class leaders in 2011, not 50% of their sales. Remember, Corolla and civic have fallen off big time and Cruze has been averaging around 20k units a month for the last few months. Also, aside from the Fusion and Malibu we dont have confirmation that any new midsizers debut in 2012. Its speculation that a new accord might show up- has not been confirmed. How did the Passat lose in roominess? what review are YOU reading?

syj
Jetta will sell 150k, which is not a failure, or a success.  The top sellers double that.  Jetta just looks like, and drives like, a failure.  Ask anyone who drove the last one.  Car & Driver couldn't rag on it more.  Last in their 5 car comparison.

Passat will be last starting next year, when the other cars are redesigned.

This car was beaten by BOTH the Camry and Sonata.  Very shady decision by MT.  It lost in price, power, efficiency, roominess, value, speed, etc.  It won handling.  

That's good enough for 3rd, not 1st place.  Admit it.
BD

@BD:

There wasnt even a 2011 passat- one reason "no one" cared about it. People will care about this one. Im sure if people went back and read your comments about the Jetta you probably repeated all the same trollish nonsense and predicted it would fail. Its been selling like hotcakes. And as others have noted, Toyota is a bit player in Europe and far behind VW and GM in china. Toyota does well in Japan and in the US. VW will outsell Toyota this year globally, they are not to be taken lightly.

@techie

MT doesnt rate cars by reliability- never have.

You never answered the question.  Do you work for Toyota?

Plenty of people care about the Passat here, and for good reason.  It's a great car.

Like so many Toyota worshippers, you used sales numbers to try to justify the Camry's greatness.  But, as usual, when presented with evidence of the Passat outselling the Camry, suddenly you don't care about sales figures.

Adam
Why would I give a monkey's hairy sac about what happens in Europe?

HERE, nobody cares about Passat, and with good reason......
BD

BD, do you work for Toyota?

VW outsells Toyota in Europe by a huge margin.  (The only company that comes close to VW sales in Europe is Ford.)  The Golf sold almost 500,000 units in Europe-- more than double what Camry sold in the U.S.  In Europe, the Passat is in the Top 10.  The Camry isn't in the Top 50.

If numbers tell the story let's look at ALL the numbers, not just the ones that favor Toyota.

Adam
Are you trying to set a record for biggest reach?

VW is not comparable to Toyota in quality.  Hasn't been for DECADES.  This ain't 1963.  

This car will sell 1/3 of Camry next year.  Why?  Because people assume it is made like crap.  It's earned that much respect......
BD

"Sonata is legitimate competition to Camry.  Passat not so much.......  

...
3.  And VW's crap-tastic quality rep will be a blow from which it will never recover."

How do people keep bashing on VW quality while forgetting that just a few years ago, Hyundai was making JUNK cars for sale in the state.  In northern states it is rare to see ANY Hyundai on the road more than 6 or 7 years old because they all rusted out and fell apart.  

VW had a bad quality run with MKIV Jettas in the early 2000s (along with some other issues), however its been fairly solid since then.  Meanwhile Hyundai was selling complete trash across their entire lineup in the early 2000s and now they get a free pass on reliability?!?

"Toyota has been building reliable cars for about 25 years
Hyundai?  About 5 years
VW hasn't even started yet......."

VW has been building reliable cars for about 80 years.  During a timespan that long you're bound to have a few ups and downs along the way.

Like Toyota.  Did you know their quality got so bad at one point they actually left the U.S. market for an entire year?  

Can't say that about VW.

"You do know that they tested a Camry with less responsive smaller wheels, right?"

The Camry comes with smaller, less responsive wheels because that is the way Toyota chooses to equip it.  Don't blame MT.  Blame Toyota.

@chiguy:

Exactly- and when will these folks realize that MT does NOT rank cars in reliability? This is obvious. the majority of the fanboys are saying "the Camry may not be a better car in this test, but the VW will break down so the camry should've won". What? MT isnt in the business of predicting reliability of new cars. IN fact, CR doesnt even rate cars based on reliability. They give them a road test score and then if the car scores high enough its recommended if the reliability is there. They do NOT base their scores on predicted reliability though.

The Passat wins again!

The VW haters must be foaming at the mouth . . .

@ ChiGuy, Here you go.

"In terms of power, interior space, useability, and fuel economy, the Camry's the best here,"

You do know that they tested a Camry with less responsive smaller wheels, right?

As soon as I saw a Camry in this test, I knew the usual shills for Toyota would be chiming in. I am of course referring to Jimmy and Black Dynamite. Keep drinking the Kool-Aid and I hope you're comfy under the bridge.

For them and the others wondering why their beloved Camry didn't win, read the quote from the article.

Let's just say the Camry returned some middling scores in a few key areas. First, we were unimpressed with its "architectural statement" styling, whose elements lacked cohesion and had an overall look too similar to that of its predecessor. Next, the soft suspension, while great for road trips, was not terribly assuring over the handling loop. "In the tighter sections of our drive, the Camry was not confidence-inspiring," declared Kong. Last, for $23,260 to start, the Toyota omitted such standard niceties as alloy wheels, which were included in our as-tested $22,405 Hyundai as well as a $23,460 Passat S with Appearance Package (our $25,595 SL came with larger 17-inch alloys)

BTW, what is the point of 5 cylinders, if it's less powerful, and less efficient, than 4-cylinders?

Motor Trend didn't justify a Passat victory at all!  
It lost in every way.  Efficiency, power, speed, price, value,  etc.....
BD

Syj says

"Your ignorance is astounding. You should really stop posting.
1. VW's sales are up because they are following the Toyota/Honda philophy- worry about value and inoffensive styling instead of plush interiors and lux features."

You be happy to know i considered your suggestion and decided to continue to post.  I can't stop posting & let your misrepresent facts & cloud smart people's judgment.

Accord and Camry lost market share this year because of the natural event and shortage of parts.  They also have lost some market share because of improvements in Sonata and Optima.  Has nothing to do with VW Passat which was just re-designed.

Luxury features of a VW? you got to be kidding.  Feel the interior of Jeta.  Checkout the engine of a VW.  Camry brought a six speed automatic to market as soon as GM and Ford forced its hands and also Sonata and Optima.  It has a great engine, as good a V4 as an Accord.  To me those are still the best V4s.  No they don't have DI but not needed

1. Passat - Questionable engineering and the styling of a bar of Dove soap. Pass
2. Toyota Camry - Well rounded, reliable, built for the sheep of the driving world. Pass
3. Sonata - Hyudai's rising star looks the part but doesn't have the performance to back it up. Pass

Well it's nice to know that I can still avoid these cars and wont be missing anything. NEXT!

So many euro fanbois :\

Regardless, the Sonata is the one winning.  Just look outside at a street corner near you.  Forget this review.

@pmirp:

Your ignorance is astounding. You should really stop posting.
1. VW's sales are up because they are following the Toyota/Honda philophy- worry about value and inoffensive styling instead of plush interiors and lux features.
2. Even CR notes VWs reliability has improved
3. VWs recent models (Jetta and CC) have been successful so there is no reason to doubt the Passat
4. Camry and Accord have lost significant share over the last few years and even CR doesnt rate either sedan as best in class.
5. Toyota doesnt use state of art powertrains in anything not called Lexus. The Camrys engine is basically the same one its had for years. At least the Sonata has direct injection.

Camry got over 34 MPG during their test?
Nice!

I guess that's why it's The People's Champion!
BD

Consider this: for less money than this Passat, you could buy a Sonata SE 2.0T ($25,405) or a Camry XLE ($25,485). Both come with far more options / amentities than the Passat tested here.

MT, if you're going to do a comparison test, please bring comparable vehicle.

Old people buy the Camry.

The younger, hip generation buys the Passat. Many people are willing to compromise a few mpg in order to have a more comfortable, better feeling car.

MotorTrend, how about doing a hard-core reliability test? Take a few different cars/engines and put them through some extreme (Top Gear-esque) testing to find out just how reliable/durable these cars are. I'd love to see VW's 2.5L and 2.0T dispell the myth that VW's aren't reliable.

Syj says:
"Wake up, VW is on the rise. Not everyone buys cars based on CR rankings even if you chose to do so. VWs sales are way up and the PAssat will sell. "

Syj, on what planet do you live on?  People who buy mid-size cars review CR because reliability matters.  They don't want cars in the shop constantly.  Until VW improves that, they stand no chance.  

Their sales increased, because of price reductions to make their cars more competitive with Camry and Koreans.  In process they have moved away from attributes that they have pushed for years (performance of their 2.0 turbo and quality materials).  Now they got nothing left.  

I admit Passat is a competitive product from quality of interior and design, but not so much from a engine perspective.  Until they invest in modern engine technology like Camry and Koreans, they stand zero chance.  And until they improve quality year over year, they will come in last.

Now go study some more about virtues that sell mid-size family cars in US before posting

FullMonte:
I agree with you about the lack of colour imagination currently expressed by most manufacturers.  One of the cars I recently looked at came in only six flavours: black, white, red, and what amounts to three shades of grey: silver, light grey, and dark grey. Kinda boring.

Maybe if Fiat is successful in the U.S., we'll start seeing a more diverse colour pallete. While I have no interest in buying a Fiat 500, it does come in over a dozen colours, including cappucino and some of the others you mentioned.

Sonata is legitimate competition to Camry.  Passat not so much.......  

1.  The average buyer won't weight the test drive heavily on handling.  
2.  The Passats 22/31, with less 8 fewer HP than Camry will hurt the sales pitch.
3.  And VW's crap-tastic quality rep will be a blow from which it will never recover.  

It's pretty obvious that Camry was the better car, but MT wanted something else to win.  Using the "If you squint, you can see an A8" is pretty desperate.  Good luck with that!

Speed, economy, reputation, roomy, lightweight
Toyota Camry still reigns as The People's Champion.  
BD

@ Mirage1987

It isn't the Germans fault they make superior vehicles, the others need to step their games up. Of these 3, the VW is the only one I'd even consider getting, just because it's German made which equals engineering superiority and it looks great (relatively).

@supervette:

Sonata has consistently been in the 8 sec range in 0-60. It doesnt perform as well as expected considering its power to weight ratio. Fastest time I've seen is 7.8s. Its barely faster than the Verano which weighs more and packs only 180hp.

@pmirp:

Wake up, VW is on the rise. Not everyone buys cars based on CR rankings even if you chose to do so. VWs sales are way up and the PAssat will sell. Lots of people like VWs styling, interiors and diesel engines. We arent in the 90s anymore, the days of people thinking that you have to buy a camry or Accord to get a sedan that will last more than 50k miles are over. The myth has been shattered and the Passat will only help VW post even larger sales gains in 2012.

The real world mileage of the sonata in this test isnt impressive at all. Hyundais continue to underachieve in real world mileage testing. On paper, the sonata is considerably more efficient than the Passat.

In real world a VW is not even on the same planet as Sonata or Camry.

When it comes to reliability, the marketplace does not recognize VW as a leader.  Reputation counts for a lot and that is where Camry has VW and Sonata beat.

VW with yesteryear engine technology, only has Camry beat by virtue of better wheels and tires.  This is a very superficial comparison.

Until the day VW proves its reliability figures year in and year out, as you state, Camry is number 1 in sales for a reason.

Also when it comes to overall numbers this year for Camry and other Japanese cars, one has to remember the limitations on capacity as result of natural disaster.  All to say, we don't know what happens next year, except, VW has zero chance of being in top 3 among mid-size cars.  

Kind of an embarrassing conclusion to your story, don't you say? Shades of Motor Trends past when you picked Honda Insight over Toyota Prius


View the original article here

Tuesday, 25 October 2011

First Test: 2012 Toyota Camry Hybrid XLE

2012 Toyota Camry Hybrid XLE Front Three Quarters As the alternative propulsion sector stands now, Toyota has it pretty good. The do-no-wrong Prius is indisputably the eco car standard-bearer, and continues to sell in healthy quantities -- 83,918 through August 2011. But this is America, land of the pickup truck and midsize sedan. Fortunately for Toyota, it also knows how to build, market, and peddle cars like the 2012 Toyota Camry Hybrid. Let's talk fuel economy. Whereas the old Camry Hybrid's 31/35 mpg city/highway pales in comparison to the Ford Fusion Hybrid's 41/36 mpg city/highway and the hybridized Hyundai Sonata and Kia Optima (35/40 mpg city/highway), our top-of-the-line 2012 XLE tester does a cool 41/38 mpg city/highway on 17-inch alloys wrapped with low-rolling-resistance 215/55-17 tires. That's a 21-percent combined mpg improvement over 2011. A spirited 200-plus-mile dash of city, highway, and quick, undulating back roads left us with a real-world consumption of 37 mpg. Go with the more basic LE trim -- replete with smaller 16-inch steel wheels and narrower rubber -- and the EPA figure rests at 43/39 mpg city/highway (up 26 percent).

The tailpipe emissions-less electric component of the power-split hybrid system is chiefly championed by the 141-horsepower tractive motor. If directed by the continuously variable transmission or slipped into the newly inserted EV mode, the motor alone can propel the Camry Hybrid with a not-unsubstantial 199 lb-ft of torque (peak torque available from 0-1500 rpm). Unless the 1.6-kilowatt-hour nickel-metal-hydride battery is at its most minimal state of charge, driving around town carefully and quietly as a bona-fide EV is a cinch, and doesn't feel particularly penalizing given the motor's output. Toyota claims there is less friction loss in the transaxle and better motor-voltage control aiding the relatively accomplished HSD system. Blending battery and gasoline energy sources in haste produces a net of 200 silky horsepower, up from 187. Powertrain integration is honestly among the best of any hybrid vehicle out there.

The soft, floaty ride helps generate the illusion the Camry Hybrid is larger than it really is, a plus if you're constantly shuttling people around. There's sufficient space in the back seat to fit three average-size males abreast without the middle passenger having to curl into a ball -- taxi fleets operating Camry Hybrids should find welcome fares. On paper, the interior dimensions haven't drastically changed, with the biggest numeric differences highlighted in rear leg room (+0.6 inch) and rear hip room (+0.6 inch).

Answer: Kind of. The interior design and build materials won't be winning any awards, not even in the pedestrian midsize segment. We found the revised color patterns a bit more inviting, and the ergonomics and controls placement and functionality to be well executed, but in the end there's a lack of intangible warmth in the cabin - it's appliance-like, if you will.

Front engine, FWD, 5-pass, 4-door sedan 2.5L/156-hp/156-lb-ft Atkinson cycle DOHC 16-valve I-4, plus 141-hp/199-lb-ft electric motor; 200 hp comb


View the original article here

Sunday, 9 October 2011

2012 Toyota Camry Hybrid

See What the
Rest of the Web Says We've gathered reviews from Edmunds.com, Cars.com plus live Tweets on this car. See What We Found »

Toyota has fully redesigned its Camry mid-size sedans for 2012, and it expects more shoppers than ever to opt for the Camry Hybrid.

Simply put, that's because this time around, the automaker has engineered the 2012 Toyota Camry Hybrid as a fully competitive, mainstream model in the Camry lineup—not just a niche model.

The 2012 Camry Hybrid inherits all the latest Hybrid Synergy Drive developments that made their debut in the current-generation Toyota Prius; and just as in the Prius, the Camry Hybrid can run for a short distance on electric power alone under some conditions. It packs an Atkinson-cycle (high-compression-ratio) version of the Camry's 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine, plus the hybrid drive system—altogether making 200 horsepower. With weight cut significantly versus the previous version, too, the Camry Hybrid feels quicker and more responsive.

For interior space and comfort, as well as drivability, the Hybrid no longer makes much of any sacrifice compared to the base Camry or other non-hybrid mid-sizers. Thanks to smarter, smaller packaging of the battery and inverter, Toyota has freed up more trunk space—and backseat space is identical.

The Camry Hybrid is also much-improved in drivability; its powertrain feels so well sorted and seamless that you're less likely than ever to be able to detect when the gasoline engine turns on or off. For non-Prius types who don't necessarily need to flaunt their eco-fashionability, yet want to cut their fuel budget, that makes the Camry Hybrid an excellent, no-compromises way to go green.

All the goodness of the rest of the 2012 Toyota Camry package translates to the Hybrid. While it's all in a very conservative wrapper, you'll find a well-designed, spacious cabin, upgraded trims, and (mostly) comfortable seats—including plenty of backseat legroom and headroom. Ten standard airbags and an available blind-spot warning system should provide peace of mind, and the Hybrid feature set now includes dual-zone climate control and Bluetooth in all trims. High-end JBL sound, HD Radio, a navigation system, and a new Entune app-based system are all on offer.

For more about the Camry Hybrid, see our full review of the 2012 Toyota Camry lineup.


View the original article here

Saturday, 8 October 2011

2012 Toyota Camry

See What the
Rest of the Web Says We've gathered reviews from Edmunds.com, Cars.com plus live Tweets on this car. See What We Found »

Toyota has given its lineup of best-selling Camry sedans a full redesign for 2012, but at first look you might not even know it. Nearly everything—every piece of sheetmetal, every element of the Camry's underbody structure, the suspension, and all the interior components—is different in the 2012, with only some engines and transmissions carried over. Instead of trying to make the new car radically different, Toyota essentially took a look at the existing car and asked how it could redesign nearly every component to make a better end result for core values like comfort and safety.

The Camry's new design (yes again, it's really new) definitely skews toward pragmatism at every possible opportunity. Corners are a little boxier this time, for aerodynamic reasons; front A-pillars are narrower (yet stronger) for better visibility; and the roofline has been tucked up and back just a tad for rear headroom.

Besides, the Camry has never been one for sex appeal. It's been such a strong seller for its combination of soft ride and roomy interior appointments, and for its strong value for the money, reliability, resale value, and other very sensible factors.

In most of those respects, the 2012 Toyota Camry is even better. Overall, the Camry rides and drives in a more refined, responsive way, and the package and features have been much improved. Thanks to some very significant weight savings, the base four-cylinder Camry performs better than ever, while the V-6 fills a niche for those wanting a particularly strong, refined (yet still budget-priced) sedan.

Toyota has refocused the Hybrid model, making it a more significant part of the model lineup and offering it in both LE and XLE trims. It's both better-performing and more frugal this year, gaining many of the improvements to the nickel-metal-hydride battery pack and Hybrid Synergy Drive that the Prius got last year. Just like the previous-generation Camry, the Hybrid version feels about as quick as the base four—possibly a little more so when you tap into full electric-motor boost. And the mileage improvement is phenomenal: 43 mpg city, 39 highway for the LE.

With 10 standard airbags, Toyota looks poised to reclaim top safety ratings with the 2012 Camry. It also has made Bluetooth hands-free connectivity a standard feature; sound systems have been upgraded; and the Entune system allows easy access to integrated apps—for Pandora music streaming, for instance. 


View the original article here

Wednesday, 27 July 2011

First Drive: 2011 Toyota Camry SE V-6

Good Sport: America's Family Sedan is One Humble Ride2009 Toyota Camry SE Left Side Take a stab at guessing the top-selling car in the United States. Played-out request, you say? That's only because the answer has been the same for so long. Toyota, maker of the benchmark midsize sedan/sales stalwart, assembled 99.1 percent of all Camrys sold through March in America. Thanks, Indiana and Kentucky. Through the first quarter of 2011, the Camry found new owners 76,821 times (up 10.5 percent over 2010, though the first three months of 2010 were impacted by recall scares). It might as well get a big bull's-eye painted on its honestly hewn, Vibrant Clarity-themed sheetmetal.

2009 Toyota Camry SE Right Side The bull's-eye works two ways. Many consumers find their driving needs fulfilled by Camry, making the family car an invaluable company asset. Second, the Camry is an easy target for certain, um, enthusiasts who feel the urge to publicly proclaim their disapproval. Common descriptors thrown around include "appliance," "beige," and "boring." Example: This Camry is a boring, beige appliance. Is it all blind hatred? Allow us to present another perspective. What the Camry lacks in flair and curb appeal it makes up for in sincerity, wrapped in a forgivably ordinary-looking package. The SE V-6 we drove employs Toyota's 3.5-liter six-cylinder, which made quite the name for itself at its debut, easily banging out 268 horsepower and 248 pound-feet of torque in the Camry's service. It's among the best-endowed midsize sedans (engine-wise) available, and the enthusiast can't fault it for its intended acceleration time: an estimated 6.1 seconds from 0-60 mph.

Motor Trend Rating:  Stars 

View the original article here

Saturday, 23 July 2011

Toyota: N. American production to return to normal in September

The nation of Japan was rocked by a massive 8.9 magnitude earthquake followed by a devastating tsunami in the month of March, crippling Japanese automakers and their integral supply networks. As a result, global production was either temporarily halted or significantly slowed across automakers, including Toyota, for the months that followed.

Specifically at Toyota, the impact of the devastated supply network reached North American production, keeping it at its current rate of about 80 percent of normal output. Today, the automaker confirmed that it returned production for eight out of 12 North American models to full capacity as of June 6, with September the target month to return all 12 models to full production.

“After September we will focus on making-up lost production as much as possible,” said Steve St. Angelo, executive vice president of Toyota motor engineering & manufacturing, North America. “Our team members and suppliers here and in Japan have worked tirelessly to get us back to 100 percent, overcoming many challenges. The effort in Japan has been incredible, especially in the midst of such tragedy and devastation.”

The world’s top automaker has suffered sizable sales losses as a result of reduced supply and public perception, keeping potential buyers away from “empty” lots.


View the original article here

Friday, 22 July 2011

Toyota unveils third-generation Yaris hatchback for Europe

New Cars Home

Learn more about new cars with our extensive collection of overviews, specifications, and pictures.


View the original article here

Friday, 15 July 2011

2012 Jaguar XKR-S, Toyota Repo, GM Employees For LGBTQ: Today's Car News

Jaguar XKR-S testing at Goodwood

Jaguar XKR-S testing at Goodwood

Jaguar has released drool-worthy video of the 2012 XKR-S doing a test-run at Goodwood Hill. [MotorAuthority]

GM employees have made an 'It Gets Better' video for LGBTQ youth. [TheCarConnection]

Toyota repossessed a murdered mom's car and the son retaliated on Facebook. [SocialCarNews]

Sri Lanka is going to use more than 200 Tata Nanos as taxis. OK, we just like the story because it talks about Tatas. [GreenCarReports]

CNBC is flat-out wrong about electric-car charging. [AllCarsElectric]

More than 11,000 new Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep vehicles are being recalled due to a steering issue. [FamilyCarGuide]

Which new car would you want over the long haul? #YouTellUs [SocialCarNews]

Watch this video of a Chevrolet Camaro race car crashing and then rolling. {MotorAuthority]

Here is a tale of a million miles, 15 years and a Honda Accord. [TheCarConnection]

Toyota is going to fix the quirks on the upcoming 2012 Prius Plug-In Hybrid before launch. [GreenCarReports]



View the original article here