Monday, 31 October 2011

2012 Ford Taurus

See What the
Rest of the Web Says We've gathered reviews from Edmunds.com, Cars.com plus live Tweets on this car. See What We Found »

The 2012 Ford Taurus, depending on how it's equipped, can play several different roles. At the base level, at about $26k, the Taurus is a big-car alternative to the likes of the V-6 Honda Accord or Chevrolet Malibu. On the other hand, it could be a luxury rival to the Buick LaCrosse or Toyota Avalon. And in top SHO guise, it's a strong, tech-loaded 365-horsepower luxury performance sedan that can sticker at $45k or even higher.

From one of the front seats, the 2012 Taurus feels almost like a personal-luxury car. There are focused, defined areas for the driver and front passenger, with a wrap-around instrument panel design and a low, wide center console that firmly splits the driver and passenger sides (and actually, taking up a lot of space). The back seat is wide, with potential space for three adults, though legroom and headroom can be surprisingly tight, given the Taurus' full-size exterior. Faux-wood and chrome trim combine with good fit and finish to give it an upscale look and feel that's generally in sync with its price tag. Special badging, glossy black dash trim, and more metallic highlights inside and out help give the SHO more interior panache, while a trunklid spoiler, twin chrome exhaust tips, and different grille hint at the brawn.

The 3.5-liter V-6 that's under the hood of most 2012 Taurus models moves this big sedan plenty quick. With 263 horsepower and 249 pound-feet of torque, plus a smooth six-speed automatic, it's rarely caught flat-footed, and the paddle shifters included in SEL and Limited versions even feel a little gimmicky in such a big, comfy sedan. On the other hand, the Taurus SHO is focused around performance, with all-wheel drive and a 365-horsepower, 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6 capable of running this big, heavy (nearly 4,400 pounds) sedan to 60 mph in about six seconds. But possibly because of that heft, the SHO is a little less transformational than you might think—in part because the SHO puts the power to the road with such stoicism and a lack of excitement or drama.

Those worried about a pillowy, overly bouncy ride have nothing to worry about here; the Taurus rides more firmly than you might expect--taut but not too harsh, and certainly in base versions no sport sedan. But it's confidence-inspiring, with direct, precise steering and more feedback than is typical from the electric power steering.

The Taurus is strong on safety. In addition to great crash-test scores (IIHS Top Safety Pick) and the standard roster of safety features, Ford offers a collision warning system and adaptive cruise control on the 2012 Taurus, as well as Blind Spot Information and Cross Traffic Alert systems. For 2012, a side-mirror-integrated blind-spot system is standard across the model line, which does help make up for the limited visibility. The Taurus SHO also offers an optional rearview camera.

As an extensively redesigned model is due for 2013, there's very little new to the Taurus lineup for 2012, other than a new color, Ginger Ale Metallic. Even in base form, the Taurus comes somewhat better-equipped than mainstream mid-size sedans. Base cars get a power driver's seat, SEL models include automatic climate control. Meanwhile, top Limited trims are the way to go if you want a loaded car, as they include showier 19-inch wheels, ambient lighting, a six-CD changer, reverse parking sensors, leather seats, and power controls for the front passenger. Ford's Sync interface for smartphones and media players is included in Limited and SHO models. Push-button start, sueded seats, and high-intensity discharge headlamps are added in the SHO.


View the original article here

Arrival: 2011 Nissan Quest LE

2011 Nissan Quesr LE Side In Motion Prior to 2011, Nissan pledged allegiance to U.S. production of its Quest minivan. The first two generations, offered from 1993 until 2002, were manufactured alongside the Mercury Villager at Ford's Avon Lake, Ohio, assembly plant. After the Nissan-Mercury deal dissolved, Nissan moved production to its Canton, Mississippi, facility, which churned out third-gen Quests from 2004 to 2009. But while U.S. production helped Americanize the Quest, Nissan never saw big sales returns, mostly due to vans that were either too small or too weird.
Front engine, FWD, 7-pass, 4-door van 3.5L/260-hp/240-lb-ft DOHC 24-valve V-6


View the original article here

2012 Chevrolet Silverado 1500

See What the
Rest of the Web Says We've gathered reviews from Edmunds.com, Cars.com plus live Tweets on this car. See What We Found »

The Chevrolet Silverado lineup spans a huge swath of the full-size pickup market, from sport trucks to hybrids to heavy-duty models. For 2012, it hasn't changed much, but it still stacks up well against newer trucks like the Ford F-150, Ram 1500, and its close kith and kin, the GMC Sierra 1500.

Chevy's full-size trucks come in a form to suit nearly every possible kind of truck user, from exurban hipsters to urban construction crew chieftans. Shoppers can opt into one of three body styles, and one of two interior designs; from among four gas engines and two automatic transmissions, or one gas-electric drivetrain; and from bed lengths ranging from the smallest 5'-8" bed on Crew Cabs and Hybrids, to the 6-6" bed on all versions save for the Hybrid, to the 8' bed offered on all versions except the Hybrid.

The Silverado's styling remains safe and a little plain, when compared to the Ram or Toyota trucks. It's one of the oldest designs on the block and it shows in its less obvious looks. That's not to say it's not handsome--Chevy's trucks have a way of looking good for decades and we suspect today's Silverado is on its way to the same distinction. The interior's unique in that it comes either with a console and more upscale trim, or as a more basic design without the console and without the woodgrain trim, both handsome and organized thoughtfully. No matter how you cut across the lineup, the Silverado look seems to be aging well.

No longer economy or horsepower leaders, the drivetrains offered in the Silverado still are competitive after a few years on the market. The range of engines includes a 195-horsepower, 4.3-liter V-6 that we'd only recommend to fleet buyers. Among the V-8s, there's a flex-fuel, 302-hp 4.8-liter V-8 in some of the less expensive models; a flex-fuel 5.3-liter V-8 with 315 hp in more mainstream versions, and outfitted with cylinder deactivation for improved fuel economy in XFE models; and at the top of the range, a 6.2-liter, 403-hp, flex-fuel V-8 in the Silverado LTZ. A four-speed automatic is fitted to base V-6 and base V-8 versions, while all other models except for the hybrid have a six-speed automatic that shifts smoothly and quietly, and helps keep those gas-mileage numbers in the ballpark of Ford's higher-mpg lineup. The 5.3-liter is our choice of the gas-only Silverados: it has ample power for almost every need, and comes with only a slight gas-mileage penalty over the basic V-6.

The Silverado Hybrid is quite different from the stock-and-trade Chevy truck, thanks to a two-mode hybrid powertrain that pairs an aluminum-alloy 6.0-liter V-8 with cylinder deactivation and variable valve timing, to an electrically variable transmission (EVT) with four fixed-ratio gears and two electric motor/generators, as well as a nickel-metal-hydride 300-volt battery pack. All together, these pieces combine to produce 332 horsepower and 367 pound-feet of torque, to a net EPA gas-mileage rating of 20 mpg city, 23 mpg highway. The Hybrid's performance isn't radically different from the gas-engined versions, save for the for the exceptionally smooth and quiet operation of the hybrid drivetrain, which runs on electricity alone up to 27 mph. Regenerative braking helps recapture some energy to charge the batteries. Despite its extra heft, the Silverado Hybrid can tow 6,100 pounds with 2WD, or 5,900 pounds with automatic dual-range four-wheel drive.

Across the lineup, the Silverado has some of the best straight-line performance in the class, though the pack has gotten significantly more competitive with Ford's new 5.0-liter V-8 and Toyota's improved V-8s. The Silverado maxes out at 10,700 pounds of towing capacity--and yet, it's still one of the easiest full-size pickups to drive, thanks to communicative steering and good to fair ride quality, which gets noticeably stiffer with four-wheel-drive models.

The Silverado's cabin doesn't meet the flexible Ram 1500 head-on with nifty features, and its cabin has some foibles that you won't find in the F-150 or Tundra, either. Front space is ample, and though the bucket seats could be more supportive for longer trips, we'd still opt for them over the flat front bench for personal use. On Crew Cab Silverados, the rear seat is placed high, stadium-style, and is split 60/40 so it can be folded down for more carrying space, but the rear seatback is nearly vertical, making it uncomfortable for longer trips. The rear access doors on extended-cab models open 170 degrees, for easier loading of small items like a toolbox or a properly folded tent. Throughout the Silverado range, a hushed and refined cabin is standard, with less wind noise and tighter build quality than some of the other full-size trucks in the class.

The Silverado's chief selling point still is its flexible order sheet. With its perennial appeal to work users, the Silverado comes in a staggering array of configurations and build combinations. Stripped-down work versions sticker in the low-$20,000 range, while loaded Hybrid models are priced near $50,000. Standard equipment even includes cruise control, while the options list counts leather upholstery, a new hard-drive navigation system, Bluetooth and USB connections for cell phones, and GM's OnStar telematics system, for everything from directions to emergency services.


View the original article here

If Enthusiasm and Optimism Paid Dividends, Saab Would be Thriving

If Enthusiasm and Optimism Paid Dividends, Saab Would be Thriving imageUpdate: Reality trumps optimism. The District Court in Vanersborg, Sweden, on Thursday rejected Saab Automobile AB’s proposal for voluntary reorganization, which would cover Saab Automobile Powertrain and Saab Automobile Tools. “Saab Automobile is disappointed with the ruling and will appeal the District Court’s decision,” owner Swedish Automobile N.V. said in a press release.

This isn’t Ingmar Bergman’s “The Seventh Seal,” though one could imagine Victor Muller playing a game of chess with Death to save the life of his company. Everyone from the chairman and CEO on down has a tenacious grip on Saab Automobile. The feeling is that if Saab can get the cars rolling out of the factories again, they’ll find customers. The reorganization plan filed in Sweden Wednesday morning is not a bankruptcy and has no direct counterpart in U.S. bankruptcy law, says Tim Colbeck, president and chief operating officer of Saab Cars North America. His company, which comes under the umbrella of Saab’s parts entity, is not part of the parent’s reorganization. It continues to operate and pay its 64 employees.

“There have been no layoffs” at SCNA, Colbeck says, and the company continues to deliver cars and the new 9-4x sport/utility vehicle to 192 U.S. dealers and 14 Canadian dealers. “Our dealerships have an adequate supply at this time,” Colbeck says, with “a little more than 3,000? 9-3s, 9-4xs and 9-5s in North American inventory.

If Enthusiasm and Optimism Paid Dividends, Saab Would be Thriving imageU.S. dealers sold 65 Saab 9-4xes last month. That new crossover is on model year changeover, Colbeck says, and so GM’s Ramos Arizpe, Mexico, plant is making Cadillac SRXes only, right now. Colbeck could not estimate how long it will be before Saab’s Trollhatten assembly plant restarts.

Saab’s parent company, Swedish Automobile NV (The Netherlands) filed the “proposed voluntary reorganization,” a “self-managed, legal process under Swedish law headed by an independent administrator appointed by the court,” working with Saab’s management. It took one reorganization to free Saab from GM. It will take another to keep it alive until two Chinese companies can take a majority of Saab’s ownership.

The reorganization period is three months, and can be extended for three-month periods, to a maximum of 12 months. Meanwhile, Sweden’s “wage guarantee scheme” pays employees in Trollhatten.

If Enthusiasm and Optimism Paid Dividends, Saab Would be Thriving image“August salaries are expected to be paid within a short time frame following court approval,” Saab says in its press release. The tough part is that while this is going on, Saab must get its suppliers on board to deliver parts.

The company “is confident it will obtain this support, particularly because Saab Automobile aims at full redemption of outstanding debts.”

Saab continues to wait for Chinese government approval of auto dealer Pang Da’s and small automaker Youngman Lotus’ proposed $355.2 million-equivalent, 50-percent investment in the Swedish company. Muller continues to work on obtaining bridge funding to get the company through the reorganization and to its proposed Chinese investments.

If Enthusiasm and Optimism Paid Dividends, Saab Would be Thriving imageColbeck says he’s confident Chinese authorities will approve Pang Da and Youngman Lotus as Saab investors. Though he can’t estimate how quickly that will happen, the Chinese regulatory process is making progress. This, despite the obscurity of Youngman Lotus in the Chinese auto industry, and despite Hummer’s failure in a similar deal in early 2010. One big difference is that Sichuan Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machines, which makes heavy equipment and not passenger vehicles, was trying to buy Hummer.

How will Colbeck sell Saabs in North America while the automaker undergoes reorganization in Sweden? He believes the reorganization announced Wednesday will ensure the brand will continue to exist, which should be enough to give Saab customers confidence. He speaks of “the potential of the brand,” with the 9-4x just launched, the 9-5 wagon on the way and a new 9-3 in the works. Throw in the 9-1 small car and the 9-6 and 9-7 “prestige” models announced (it’s hard to imagine a Saab selling for more than the $40,000-plus 9-5) along with the Pang Da and Youngman Lotus deal in July and, “we’re going to have the biggest lineup we’ve ever had,” Colbeck says.

That’s vaporware, for now. That’s optimism, too. All Saab has are names for three new models, more will than money to build three current models and an agreement for a cash infusion that relies on an obscure Chinese automaker. I hope these prospects are more solid than they appear.

Follow me on Twitter @MT_Lassa.


View the original article here

2012 Ford Fusion Hybrid

See What the
Rest of the Web Says We've gathered reviews from Edmunds.com, Cars.com plus live Tweets on this car. See What We Found »

After Toyota's Prius, one of the most popular hybrid vehicles offered is the Ford Fusion Hybrid. The gas-electric sedan is in its final months on the market, as a new Fusion is due to be introduced soon, but the Fusion Hybrid still is one of the best hybrids on the market.

On paper, the Fusion Hybrid's specs are fairly conventional--by hybrid standards, that is. A 2.5-liter four-cylinder is the core of the drivetrain, and it's set up to run on a leaner mix of fuel and air than usual. It's paired with a set of batteries and motors that act as an electronic continuously variable transmission (eCVT), all together giving the sedan the output of a V-6-powered car, but the fuel economy of a four-cylinder.

According to the EPA, the Fusion Hybrid earns a rating of 41/36 mpg. You'd have to shop a Honda Insight or Toyota Prius to find numbers like those, but even in that set, Ford's integration of hybrid hardware is superior. Transitions between electric and gas power are very smooth, and the steering and transmission don't have as much of the lifeless feel we've experienced in the Prius and Insight. There's an EV mode that lets the Fusion be driven at speeds of up to 47 mph on battery power alone--and with a frugal right foot, you can coax almost 700 miles of driving out of a single tank of gas.

It's also one of the best-looking hybrids you can buy. The Prius, Insight and even the Chevy Volt are a little dowdy compared to the Fusion's crisp styling, and its well-finished interior feels a cut above the crowd, too, as does its adult-sized rear seat.

Maybe best of all, if you're a gadgetophile, Ford's economy monitors display your driving efficiency on the LCD gauges in the form of a vine, which grows as you learn how to drive and use less gas. Nifty.

Cosmetic differences between the standard Fusion and the Fusion Hybrid are minimal, but the hybrid does get its own 17-inch wheels, as well as seats covered in recycled materials and a standard 110-volt power outlet. No changes are planned for the 2012 model year, in advance of a new Fusion lineup for the 2013 model year.

For an in-depth review of this green sedan and its kin, see TheCarConnection's Ford Fusion and Fusion Hybrid page.


View the original article here

Should Hyundai Build a Rear-Drive Sedan to Take on the New BMW 3 Series?

Whether purists like it or not, BMW is pressing ahead with its turbo four-cylinder strategy. First it was the Z4 Roadster and 528i, now BMW has just-announced that its all-new 2012 BMW 3 Series will come with a version of the automaker’s new 2.0-liter four-cylinder turbo rated at 240 horsepower, replacing the naturally-aspirated 3.0-liter straight six that has served so well for so long in the 3 Series.

For more on the 2012 3 Series and tons of photos, click over to our first look.

The 3 Series has long been the benchmark in its segment, and the new car should continue that tradition. The competition has been churning out 3 Series-fighting cars for years, but they’ve generally been beaten to a pulp when the punches start flying in comparison tests. That’s not stopping other automakers from continuing to try. Cadillac has said in no uncertain terms that its upcoming ATS sedan has the 3 Series squarely in its gun sights. Four-cylinder, turbocharged power has also been rumored for the ATS.

There’s another new 3 Series competitor potentially lurking in the shadows – this one from Korean juggernaut Hyundai, who has been churning out new offerings seemingly every week. And Hyundai already has a rear-drive platform seemingly tailor-made to underpin a 3 Series competitor.

“The Genesis Coupe is in the same segment, really, as the 3 Series coupe,” Hyundai’s U.S. CEO John Krafcik told Automotive News in February. “One of the things we’re thinking is: Should we do something that’s a sedan version of that?”

While Krafcik is right to say the Genesis Coupe is in the same general segment as the 3 coupe, it’s not really in its league – yet. The potential is there for Hyundai to deliver a luxury leaning, rear-drive sport sedan off of the Genesis Coupe architecture with enough chops to rival the 3 Series.

Of course it remains to be seen if Hyundai is indeed doing more than just thinking about a sedan version of the Genesis Coupe.  But just for some fun Friday gearhead armchair quarterbacking, let’s speculate on what equipment it might possibly have, as well as come up with a wish-list of desirable goodies.

Competitive Handling: If there’s been one knock against Hyundai, it is that it often emphasizes ride comfort over outright handling and ultimate grip. Considering the vast majority of American consumers define “handling” as how well they can crank the wheel to get into a tight parking space, that’s probably not the worst strategy. Also, South Korea’s aggressive infrastructure plan and modernization favors efficiency over passion, and consequently, most major roads and freeways are straight lines, with tunnels blown through mountains, rather than curvy roads strewn romantically around verdant peaks. But if Hyundai wants to be legitimately discussed in the same breath as the 3 Series, it had better bring its A-game in the handling department.

Bang for the Buck: C’mon, we’re talking about the Koreans. Would you expect anything less? On a percentage-basis, I think the mini-Genesis (or whatever it’s going to be called) needs to cost about 20 percent less than a comparably-equipped 3 Series. Not that I think it’s going to be an inherently inferior product, but when you’re going up against a brand and model as established as the 3, you’d better have a compelling hook to get people into the showroom.

Manual Transmission Option: This may seem like a quaint anachronism to some, but it’s a hugely symbolic gesture to the gearheads that they were being considered during the development process. If Hyundai wants to be viewed as a legitimate contender in the sport sedan market, a DIY shifter option is a must.

A Useable Backseat: I know it’s a delicate balance between turning a car into a bloated pig, and keeping the overall size and weight down. But the rear seat should be at least somewhat accommodating. Perhaps I’m spoiled by my Sonata’s commodious rear quarters, and I know there are some packaging compromises inherent in rear-wheel drive that prevent it from being as space-efficient as a comparably-sized front-driver, but if it’s cramped quarters for four of your average 6-foot American dudes, it’s going to be a fail.

Engine Options: I think Hyundai should match BMW engine-for-engine. Obviously, probably with a V-6 instead of a straight-six. But Hyundai already has a powerhouse of a four-banger in its arsenal with the 2.0T in the Sonata. Perhaps not the smoothest or quietest specimen out there, it delivers plentiful power and torque from just off idle all the way up to 6000+ rpm. Frankly, I think the engine is hampered in a front-drive installation. It’s torque-managed in the Sonata to prevent excessive wheelspin and torque steer. Free from the electronic nannies in a FWD application, this engine could really shine in a 3 Series-sized rear-drive sedan. The coming 3.3 GDI V-6 would also provide a compelling option for those who want a little more refinement and a more traditional driving experience. Offer both engines with a manual or automatic transmission.

Even with all the right hardware, Hyundai will have its work cut out for it convincing sport sedan enthusiasts to give it a shot. Granted, both the Genesis and Equus have exceeded sales expectations, but no other BMW has the same passionate following and loyalty that the 3 Series does.

What do you think? Would you consider a rear-drive Hyundai sport sedan that closely matched the 3-series’ specs for a 20-percent or greater discount? Can the Koreans compete in this hallowed segment?


View the original article here

Sunday, 30 October 2011

Steve Jobs as Henry Ford? No — Try Billy Durant or Alfred P. Sloan

From the day Apple launched its first iMac to the day it launched its second or third iPhone, it was impossible to attend any new auto product launch from the Geneva motor show to a press conference on the latest cupholder without hearing of the influence of Steve Jobs’ computers. “Apple-inspired,” “iMac-inspired,” “iPod-inspired” and “iPhone-inspired” automotive design was all over the place, in theoretical concepts if not in practice.

It culminated in our 2011 Car of the Year, the Chevrolet Volt. Its “milk white” interior trim available in some packages its weak design point. I finally replaced my six-year-old milk white iBook last summer with a new, aluminum-case model. Milk white is history at the maddening Apple stores. It took me six years to replace it, because Apple’s design does not come cheap, even if everything is assembled in China. If Apple is like any car company, it’s like BMW, with less-expensive Nanos the equivalent of its Mini line.

After Steve Jobs died at age 56 Wednesday, pundits rushed in to compare the Apple co-founder and CEO to Henry Ford and Thomas Edison. First, let’s dispose with the Edison comparison. That would be Bill Gates, right down to the question of how much Edison invented and how much invention he oversaw.

Steve Jobs as Henry Ford? No Try Billy Durant or Alfred P. Sloan imageFord put America on wheels after he automated Ransom Eli Olds’ simple assembly line, though non-car people often think of him as the “inventor” of the automobile. The wired industry does have a lot in common with the auto industry, including the cliché about success having many fathers.

Like those who believe Henry Ford invented the car, I don’t really know or care about the computer business much beyond the past 40 years. Though I’ve been brand-loyal in my computer purchases for about 12 years, to me it’s much like whether I’d rather have a Toyota Corolla or a Honda Civic. Computers are, as my friend Randy Patnode would say, typewriters that type glowing letters.

But Steve Jobs as Henry Ford? The model Ford automated for production, the T, was designed to be all the car anyone needed. It wasn’t the easiest to drive, as Ford eschewed updates like self-starters to keep costs down. He shut down his big, automated Highland Park factory for five months in 1927, just so he could finally replace the T with the Model A.

Jobs was more like William Crapo Durant, the General Motors founder who was great at starting companies and building their cultures than actually running them … until Jobs became more like Alfred P. Sloan.

Durant founded GM in September 1908. He was forced out and replaced with bankers during one of the frequent financial panics of this pre-SEC era, in 1910. Then Durant formed the Chevrolet Motor Company in 1911, using it five years later to buy up GM shares and lead that automaker again.

Jobs famously started NeXT and Pixar animation after Apple booted him in 1985, and rejoined Apple in 1997 when Apple purchased NeXT. The Durant-Jobs comparison falls apart quickly from here. Durant regained control of GM in late 1916, then got the boot again in 1920 during another panic, never to return. He later launched another automaker, named Durant, but it didn’t survive the Great Depression. Durant’s last job was running a Flint bowling alley in the ‘40s.

Steve Jobs as Henry Ford? No Try Billy Durant or Alfred P. Sloan imageJobs said his ouster from Apple rejuvenated him. When he returned, Apple had negligible market share compared with PCs, but like Sloan when he hired Harley Earl in 1927 to run GM’s Art & Colour department, Jobs made style, fashion and design the signature for the computer company. Jobs’ 1927 LaSalle was his first translucent iMac from 1998, available in several deep colors when you could have any PC in any color you wanted, so long as it was dull beige.

Since then, Apple has elevated Sloan’s planned obsolescence to new heights. The company updates and replaces iBooks, MacBook Airs, iPhones, iPods and iPads with a frequency that would make Bill Mitchell jealous.

No Apple, no PC, no smartphone ever will give me the kind of thrill I can get from nearly any car on nearly any road. No new design can match the innovation or diversity of style of Model Ts, Chrysler Airflows, Citroen DSes, Porsche 911s, Corvettes, ’49 Cadillacs and ‘50s Buicks, ’65 Mustangs, Honda CRXs, Minis, Bugeye Sprites or Mazda Miatas. But without Steve Jobs, one phone or laptop or MP3 player would be pretty much like the other, and the only reasons for choosing one over another would be price.


View the original article here

2012 Buick Verano

See What the
Rest of the Web Says We've gathered reviews from Edmunds.com, Cars.com plus live Tweets on this car. See What We Found »

The all-new 2012 Buick Verano certainly isn't the first compact sedan from Buick. But while past lackluster efforts have been merely badge-engineered versions of Chevrolet models, GM argues that the Verano is something markedly more luxurious—and worth the extra few thousand over the nearly identically sized Chevrolet Cruze.

The Verano is, in all fairness, a completely different vehicle. It's assembled in a different plant than the Cruze and shares no body panels, as well as no parts above the floorpan—even though these two models do share a common architecture. Inside, the Verano gets richer leather, a standard voice-activated touch-screen infotainment system, and true luxury features like a heated steering wheel.

Especially from the side, the Verano tends to look like a large sedan—in particular, Buick's LaCrosse—sized down. The long, arching roofline and additional front mini-windows tend to stretch it out a bit visually, as do the low hoodline combined with the bold vertical grille. We like most of the chrome accents—including the light strokes of chrome that angle around the rear corners then angle downward to the center in back—but the Buick 'ventiports,' which have again found their way atop the Verano's fenders, look tacky as ever.

The Verano, with its 180-horsepower, 2.4-liter direct-injection four-cylinder engine, is by no means quick; but its six-speed automatic transmission has been fully reworked for quicker yet smoother responses, so it's a very refined combination. Four-wheel disc brakes provide plenty of stopping power, even if the pedal feel is old-lux spongy. Handling is better than you might think, given the Verano's relatively soft ride; it's safe, responsive, and even quite fun, with a sense of confidence and more enjoyment than in cushy alternatives such as the Lexus ES 350.

The Verano's EPA ratings, of 21 mpg city, 31 highway, aren't all that impressive next to some other non-luxury compact sedans—like the Chevrolet Cruze or Ford Focus, for example—but they're better than nearly all luxury-brand sedans its size (except for hybrids like the Lexus HS 250h and Lincoln MKZ Hybrid).

What does distinguish the 2012 Verano from less-expensive compact sedans, along with many premium-brand models, is its phenomenally refined, comfortable, quiet interior. Quiet Tuning is a keyword at Buick, and it describes much of the Verano's personality. Through meticulous sound-deadening measures like triple-sealed doors, laminated side glass, an acoustic windshield, and various foams, baffles, and mats, the Verano is very, very quiet inside. Buick has worked to isolate road, wind, and engine noise, so even if you're driving the Verano hard, on some of the coarsest surfaces, you'll be able to have a soft-spoken conversation.

Interior appointments are also worthy of being compared to those of any luxury car this size. And thanks to its front-wheel-drive layout, the Verano has a very spacious interior. Front seats are superb, with all-day support for a wide range of drivers, along with plenty of seat travel and headroom for the tallest drivers. Rear seats are well contoured for adults, too; the only thing that calls the Verano out as a compact is the need to compromise legroom between front and rear if there are several lanky occupants riding at once. Trunk space is large and well-shaped, and rear seatbacks fold forward nearly flat, with a wide opening.

Crash-test ratings aren't yet out for the 2012 Verano at the time of posting, but GM expects to achieve top five-star federal results, as well as Top Safety Pick status from the IIHS. Equipment-wise, it's all here: ten standard airbags, electronic stability control, and anti-lock braking with brake assist, as well as OnStar Automatic Crash Response. Rear parking assist is available.

The Verano is clearly not a Cadillac, but it's not priced as one either. For just $23,470, the base 2012 Buick Verano comes equipped with an impressive roster of features, including dual-zone automatic climate control, steering-wheel controls, Bluetooth, a USB input, and the Buick Intellilink touch-screen interface, which includes voice controls as well as Pandora and Stitcher apps. A Convenience Group adds heated side mirrors, an auto-dimming rearview mirror, and rear parking assist, while a Leather Group adds to that heated seats, a driver power seat, Bose surround sound audio, push-button keyless start, and premium leather upholstery. A heated steering wheel and nav system are among the few options, with a fully loaded Verano priced well under $30k.


View the original article here

One Off The Bucket List – My Ride in the Goodyear Blimp

Funny thing, life…Sometimes things happen in an odd and unexpected series of events that when viewed in retrospect, all seem to come together in an odd way. What seemed at the time as simply a fun, unique opportunity, made for some deep thinking in the days and weeks since. Read on to see why…

It’s hard to imagine an American alive today that doesn’t have some knowledge of the Goodyear blimp. It’s been an icon at sporting and motorsport events for decades, with a history spanning more than 80 years.

At the risk of this sounding like an awards show speech, I must extend a sincere thanks to Dean Case, Communications Manager of Mazdaspeed Motorsports. Dean and I are long-time industry friends, and I have some amusing stories to tell of some of Dean’s practical jokes played at my expense…but I’ll save those for another time.

Dean really rolled out the red carpet for me, setting up a lunch and meeting at Goodyear’s Carson, California facility, and arranging a meeting with Star Mazda Championship Series driver Connor De Phillippi, as well as outlining Mazda’s commitment to grass-roots motorsports. Goodyear is a proud sponsor of grassroots racing, and Dean wanted to make a point of highlighting the tire company’s commitment to the series. Anyone that’s been to an SCCA event can immediately see Mazda’s commitment to the grass-roots racing  is more than mere lip-service, as the prevalence of the MX-5 Miata at this level of the sport is unmistakable.

Having lived in Southern California now for more than 10 years, I’d passed the iconic airship numerous times on the 405 freeway, never thinking that I’d someday ride in it. Although I’ve heretofore referred to the blimp in the singular, there are in fact three in the U.S. The one based in the Los Angeles suburb of Carson (the one I rode on), one stationed at Goodyear’s corporate headquarters in Akron, Ohio, and a third stationed in Pompano Beach, Florida. There are also a couple of contracted blimps in Europe and Asia.

Although the term “blimp” may have pop-culture undertones of obesity and lack of agility and grace, the blimp is surprisingly responsive to control inputs, more so than you’d think. In our pre-flight orientation, Goodyear Airship Public Relations Manager Elizabeth Flynn explained how much training and experience is required to pilot these craft. I thought to myself, “How hard could it be? They just kind of hang around up there.”

Well, after boarding it, I could see how putting a rookie in charge of one of these gentle giants could mean potential disaster. Not so much because they’re inherently dangerous, but because there are virtually zero electronic or automated components involved in flying one. Aside from an add-on Garmin navigation unit, and one other digital gauge, nearly all of the gauges and controls are strictly old-school analog. Most of the directional controls are actuated by cables, most of which you can actually see…both the cables, and what they ultimately control.

If you’ve ever seen the Wizard of Oz, and the scene in which the wizard is furiously cranking wheels and pulling levers behind the curtain, the activity in the pilot’s seat is not far removed from that example. The most activity, as in most aircraft, is involved in takeoff and landing. Once at cruising altitude, the pilot turned around and casually talked to passengers.

As you can see from the video below, the predominant sound is that of the two-cycle aircraft engines. Passengers are given a headset with a mic that has to be literally millimeters away from your mouth for other passengers to hear you. Although there was conversation going on among the passengers, the only sound the iPhone video camera picked up was the ”B-R-R-R-R-R-R-R-R-R” of the engines.

Back to why this ended up being a somewhat serendipitous experience for me…Approximately a week after my blimp ride, I got a matter-of-fact, somber voice message from my father on my home answering machine. He simply said, “Please call back, it’s kind of important.” Usually, my dad ends his messages with “Call back whenever, we’ll be here all night.” I knew something significant had just happened in the family. Unfortunately, my worst fears proved true. My 92 year-old grandmother had just passed away.

Now, 92 years old is a ripe old age in anyone’s book, and I’m certainly not trying to belittle anyone else’s experience of losing a loved one at a far younger age. But the long, slow decline in her physical and mental condition after the passing of my grandfather 22 years earlier was what made it so tragic. She still enjoyed family and company over after being widowed, but her old vibrancy and will to live life to its fullest gradually faded as the years went by.

At any rate, this occurrence was a major pause moment in my life. I quickly made arrangements to fly back to Tennessee for her memorial and burial. For a four-day weekend, life was on hold. The week following had a surreal quality to it. If for no other reason, I still hadn’t acclimated to the time change going from Pacific to Eastern back to Pacific time again.

But I can’t help but think that having had the experience of a more than quarter-mile high vantage point over the Pacific coast is just a tiny foretaste of what the hereafter might be like. Some have claimed to have been to the brink, and come back to describe almost indescribable experiences and sensations. But none of us really have a full idea of what ”the other side” is like, if anything. And seeing my workplace from that vantage point is a humbling reminder how inconsequential my existence is in the greater scheme of things (see red circle).

The day I’m writing this is in fact two days after the passing of a well-known icon of the tech world, Steve Jobs. It’s also not without irony that I edited the video below on a Mac, and I recorded it with, as noted, an iPhone.

Grandma, and Steve…wherever you are…I hope the view is as great as I think it is…


View the original article here

September Sales: Slow, Steady Growth Led By Trucks, Crossovers

General Motors, Chrysler LLC and Nissan each increased sales by at least one-fifth when compared with September 2010, though the industry looks good mostly when compared with last year. Thanks to their financial problems, GM and Chrysler took bigger hits than the rest of the industry the past few years.

On Monday, Ford and Toyota estimated a low-13 million seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR), while GM estimated a number in the high 12s.

The automakers face slow growth rather than a double-dip recession, says GM sales veep Don Johnson. The auto industry remains a bright spot in consumer demand because a lot of buyers are replacing aging cars. Not to mention (as no one did) cars and trucks coming off three-year leases from the beginning of the recession with stickers higher than their owners could afford.

Pickup trucks had a good month at the Detroit Three. GM trucks were up 34.3 percent, with the Chevy Silverado and GMC Sierra selling 57,602 combined. With heavy advertising and incentives, GM expects to have its truck inventory back down to a 90-day supply, or 200,000 units, by the end of the year.

Ford sold 54,410 F-Series, and Chrysler sold 24,522 Ram pickups, helping it edge past Toyota Motor Sales, which remained beset with supply problems related to the March earthquake and tsunami in Japan.

Ford’s utilities were up 35 percent overall in September ’11, versus September ’10, led by the aged Escape and the new Explorer. As for pickups, strong sales to small businesses and contractors have helped, though certainly there can’t be too much demand resulting from home construction and repair.

The 20k+ Ford Escape sales are puzzling. The much newer Chevy Equinox also continues to sell well, but it needs to be combined with GMC Terrain sales to better the Ford.

While GM’s Chevy Cruze again led compact sales last month, its soon-to-be-replaced Malibu took a dive. Meanwhile, the new Ford Focus missed the top five in compact sales, while its soon-to-be-replaced Fusion was the third-bestselling midsize sedan. Ford blames short supply of the ’12 Focus, which launched in March. Last month, Ford said a large portion of its 14,093 Focus sales in August were of the new model. Could it be that many buyers are willing to spend a couple of dollars more per month to buy a Fusion, especially as gasoline prices have come down below $3.50 per gallon in September?

Hard to say, since Ford declined to break down old-model vs. new model Focus last month. Its Fiesta is languishing at 3,967 last month, up 30.1 percent from a start-up period September ’10. While that doesn’t sound bad, it’s off-pace from earlier this year. Meanwhile, Kia sold 6,666 Souls last month, no doubt making it the second bestselling hatchback in the U.S., after the Toyota Prius.

Hatchbacks are popular in Europe with middle-class buyers because they offer utility, interior space and flexibility in a small package in a part of the world where cars are significantly more expensive. Middle-class Americans on a stricter budget than three or four years ago don’t want hatchbacks or station wagons, but they’re buying tall combinations of both, the crossover utility.

As for the Prius, Toyota’s U.S. sales chief, Bob Carter, says that with Japanese and U.S. factories back up to capacity this month, the company’s sales will be back in the plus column in October and through the rest of the year. Sales of its bestselling Camry fell September-over-September, but it still led midsize car sales here.

Of those 24k Camrys sold in September, a few new ’12 models had trickled in to dealerships at the end of the month. Usually at this point in the old model’s cycle, it would have about 40,000 leftovers in the U.S. inventory. Toyota has just 9,000 ’11 Camrys going into October, but it plans to have 35,000 new ’12 models available through the month.

Before we go to the numbers, let me remind you to follow me on Twitter @MT_Lassa, where I post sales number through the day, each month at the beginning of the month …

1. GM: 207,145, up 19.6 percent.

*Chevy Camaro was up 10.6 percent, to 6,994. Ford Mustang was off 12.3 percent, to 5,054. Dodge Challenger was up 6 percent, to 3,328.

*Chevrolet division sales rose 21.5 percent, to 147,611.

*Big pickups had a healthy month thanks to big incentives and advertising to reduce inventory. Chevrolet Silverado sales rose 35.8 percent, to 43,698 while GMC Sierra was up 25.5 percent, to 13,904, a total of 57,602 for the two truck models.

*Cruze remained the dominant Chevy sedan, at 18,097, with a total of 187,524 for the first three quarters of ’11. Malibu was off 31.8 percent, to 11,114 and Impala was up 13.4 percent, to 13,822.

*Chevy Equinox was up 32.9 percent, to 15,497, while GMC Terrain was up 44.7 percent, to 6,910. Cadillac SRX sales rose 21.7 percent to 4,901.

*Also following a heavy advertising campaign, Cadillac CTS sales were rebounding, up 24 percent, to 4,663.

*Buick Enclave was up 10.4 percent, to 4,868 while Regal was up 87.2 percent (sales were limited to German-built cars a year ago) to 3,325. Buick overall was up 5.6 percent, to 13,599. Cadillac was up 1 percent, to 12,741.

*Chevrolet sold 723 Volts. Total sales for the first three quarters was 3,895.

2. Ford Motor Company: 175,199, up 9 percent.

*The Ford brand totaled 168,181, up 14.4 percent. That leaves 7,018 for the Lincoln brand, off 6.6 percent.

*Ford sold 20,225 Escapes, up 41.3 percent. Explorer was up 203.6 percent over the wind-down of the old model, at 11,336 last month.

*Ford cites low Focus inventories for a 24.1 percent drop to 10,309.

*Fusion topped Focus and all Chevy sedans, at 19,510, up 22.6 percent.

*F-Series had its best September since 2007, up 14.7 percent, to 54,410.

*Ford moved 3,013 of its discontinued Crown Victorias, up 53.6 percent.

*Taurus was off 38.3 percent, to 4,305.

*MKX topped Lincoln sales, at 2,267, off 14.7 percent.

3. Chrysler LLC: 127,334, up 27 percent.

*Chrysler Group claimed its best September since 2007, though it must be noted that Mopar’s nadir in 2008-10 was worse than most other automakers. So its September ’11 over September ’10 results look particularly good.

*Jeep Wrangler was up 47 percent last month, to 11,388 while Grand Cherokee was off 3 percent, to 10,580. The Ram pickup remains Chryco’s bestseller, up 45 percent to 24,522.

*Minivans remain important. Chrysler Town & Country was up 16 percent, to 10,405 and Dodge Caravan was up 27 percent, to 10,203. Dodge Journey was up 29 percent, to 5,402.

*Chrysler 200 was the company’s bestselling car, up 87 percent over the Sebring to 8,709, while the 300 was up 50 percent, to 4,445.

4. Toyota Motor Sales (including Scion, Lexus): 121,451, off 17.5 percent.

*Camry fell 19.2 percent to 24,851.

*Corolla was off 23.3 percent, to 16,147.

*Lexus ES was off just 1.9 percent, to 3,627.

*Lexus RX was off 32.6 percent, to 5,003, or 1,907 units short of Cadillac SRX sales.

*Toyota RAV4 was off 47.9 percent, to 7,649.

*Tundra was off 3.3 percent, to 6,695, while Tacoma was off 7.8 percent, to 8,180.

*Prius was off 18.2 percent, to 9,325.

5. Nissan North America (with Infiniti): 92,964, up 25.3 percent.

*Altima was up 21.7 percent, to 24,356 units.

*Sentra was up 2.9 percent, to 8,105, while Versa was up 68.1 percent, to 11,800.

*Rogue was its bestselling SUV, up 29.1 percent, to 10,740.

*Infiniti breaks out coupe and sedan numbers for its bestseller, the G series. The G sedan was up 28.9 percent, to 3,940 and G coupe was off 20.3 percent, to 1,089.

*QX was the bestselling Infiniti SUV, up 46.7 percent, to 1,206.

6. American Honda (with Acura): 89,532, off 8 percent.

*Accord fell 13.8 percent, to 18,639.

*Civic fell 26.4 percent, to 13,724.

*Odyssey was up 14.7 percent, to 8,818.

*CRV was up 9.5 percent, to 19,604, as Honda says its trucks were up 7 percent for the month.

*Pilot was up 27.9 percent, to 10,306.

*Acura division was off 6.6 percent, to 10,010.

*TSX was its bestseller, at 3,112, up 37.9 percent. Of those, 261 were TSX wagons.

*MDX was off 28.3 percent, to 2,925.

7. Hyundai: 52,051, up 11.8 percent.

*Sonata leads with 18,181, off 13.5 percent.

*Elantra may be cannibalizing some Sonata sales. The compact was up 43 percent, to 14,386.

*Genesis was off 7.1 percent, to 3,000, including sedans and coupes.

*Hyundai/Kia sales combined would total 87,660.

8. Kia: 35,609, up 18.4 percent.

*Sorento was its bestseller, up 9.9 percent, to 11,112.

*Kia sold 6,191 Optimas, up 206 percent.

*Soul is the popular small hatchback sold in the U.S. that’s not a Mini, up 24.7 percent to 6,666.

9. Volkswagen of America: 27,036, up 35.6 percent.

*Jetta totaled 15,023, up 39.5 percent.

*The all-new, all-American, Chattanooga built Passat scored 3,176, up 339.9 percent over the old model’s September ’10 sales.

*Tiguan was up 22.8 percent, at 1,628.

*If it could be combined with Audi, VW’s U.S. sales would total 36,061.

10. BMW Group: 25,749, up 11.4 percent.

*Mini accounted for 3,999 of those, off 18.1 percent.

*BMW’s crossover utility vehicles accounted for 6,343, up 46.3 percent.

11. Mazda: 25,521, up 37.4 percent.

*3 was up 11.7 percent, at 8,929.

*CX-7 was up 90.8 percent, at 4,909.

*6 was up 52.4 percent, at 4,163.

12. Mercedes-Benz: 23,897, up 15.6 percent.

*C-Class was up 32.1 percent, to 6,865 and E-Class was off 8.6 percent, to 5,122.

*The new CLS moved 709 units, up 399.3 percent.

*GL-Class, at 2,541, up 27.8 percent, outsold the M-Class, which is making its transition to a new model, at 2,477, off 10.9 percent.

13. Subaru: 20,934, up 2.3 percent.

*It’s one of the smaller Japanese brands most affected by post-earthquake shortages.

*Outback led sales at 7,607, off 6.7 percent.

14. Audi: 9,725, up 19.3 percent.

*It’s the brand’s ninth record-breaking month in a row.

*The new A6 took 1,124 of those sales, up 42.8 percent.

*A4 was up 11.4 percent, to 2,690.

*Q5 was off 1.8 percent, to 2,235.

15. Mitsubishi: 5,803, up 17 percent.

*Best September for the brand since 2008.

16. Volvo: 5,042, up 21 percent.

*S60 was its top-seller, at 1,623.

17. Jaguar/Land Rover: 3,851, up 11 percent.

*Land Rover was up 10 percent, to 2,740.

*Jaguar was up 15 percent, to 1,111.

18. Porsche: 2,170, up 10 percent.

*Cayenne was up 15 percent, to 930.

*Panamera fell 17.6 percent, to 514 units, but still beat 911.

*The outgoing 911 was up 55 percent, to 504.

19. American Suzuki: 2,026, up 23 percent.

*SX4 was up 33 percent, to 997.

*Kizashi sales fell 2 percent, to 468.

20. Saab Cars North America: 429, off 61.9 percent.

*Reported at saabsunited.com

*Sales of the 9-5, at 191, edged out the 9-3, at 190.

*48 9-4xes sold.

Compacts:

1.)   Chevy Cruze               18,097

2.)   Toyota Corolla          16,147

3.)   VW Jetta                     15,023

4.)   Hyundai Elantra        14,386

5.)   Honda Civic                13,724

Midsize sedans:

1.) Toyota Camry             24,851

2.) Nissan Altima             24,356

3.) Ford Fusion                 19,510

4.) Honda Accord            18,659

5.) Hyundai Sonata         18,181


View the original article here

Marching Through Frankfurt: Design Thoughts on the 2011 Frankfurt Show

The 2011 Frankfurt Motor Show is without question the biggest auto show in the world, in terms of distance hiked. We’re talking more than 2,000,000 square feet of convention floor space spread out in at least 11 buildings (though Audi built its own, separate 12th building, and there were tons of tiny SEMA-style shows tucked up into the rafters). Point is: Wear sensible shoes. One poor booth babe from Mazda had to march a bunch of us journalist types from one hall to another and got her spiked heel caught between cobblestones, thrice! The upside is all that marching leads to cars. Lots and lots of cars. Here are some thoughts on some of what I spied.

Marching Through Frankfurt: Design Thoughts on the 2011 Frankfurt Show imagePorsche 911 (991)

The new 911, AKA the icon’s icon. My first reaction to seeing it in the flesh is, “Big!” The 991 simply strikes me as big. Wide, thick, long — but really just big. All two of the 991s I saw on the floor were sitting on massive 20-inch wheels that dwarf the relatively puny-looking brakes. Kim Reynolds said it much better and more articulately than I’ll ever be able to, but while the 991 looks good it really no longer resembles a 911. A claim that’s all the easier to make because Porsche thought to bring along the “Ur 911” from its museum. Looking at the 1963 original compared to its 2012 offspring, it’s plain a link is missing. The fact is, the 991 looks more like the Panamera than the OG 911. Is that sad, or does it matter at all? Dunno. Will it be any good to drive? Here’s hoping!

Marching Through Frankfurt: Design Thoughts on the 2011 Frankfurt Show imageJaguar C-X16

The new Jaguar coupe is a little… fussy. I’m not sure how else to term it, but there’s a beautiful shape in there somewhere (it’s a proper Jag, there has to be) but the C-X16 has a lot of secondary visual noise grafted to it. It’s as if the actual, well-formed car is sitting atop an abstract expressionist plinth. For whatever reason, all the extra flutter seems to be affixed to the base of the body, giving me some hope that the busyness is just show car flair and that the production car can be de-fuss-i-fied by the time it hits showrooms. Here’s hoping, at any rate. I will say — in the parlance of the U.K. — that the front end is smashing. Worlds better than the 1996 Ford Taurus snout found on the XK.

Marching Through Frankfurt: Design Thoughts on the 2011 Frankfurt Show imageHyundai i30

Here we have a good-looking car. I still remember seeing the current Sonata for the first time two years back at the L.A. show and not knowing quite what to make of Hyundai’s striking new design language, the ill-named “fluidic sculpture.” However, this here i30 – which we’ll be calling the Elantra Touring when it makes its way Stateside – is a wonderful take on the theme. I particularly like the headlamp and foglight treatment, which is more masculine and less childlike than on the sedan version of the Elantra. And really, at the end of the day, can we have too many station wagons? I think not.

Land Rover DC100 and DC100 Sport Concepts

Big bossman MacKenzie and I stood and stared at the new Land Rover concepts (DC100 three-door hardtop and the DC100 Sport, an open top version (pictured at top) for a good 30 minutes. We had a particularly unique view, as between us and the two concepts stood the ageless, indefatigable, and really just fantastic Defender 90. Looking at the two design proposals next to the hulking, carved-from-British-steel original, it became immediately clear (to paraphrase Lloyd Bensten) that they’re no Defender 90. The DC100 Sport falls into the will-never-be-more-than-a-show-car file, while the three-door hardtop comes off as what a Toyota FJ Sport would look like. I won’t name names, but a fairly high ranking Land Rover dude assured me and MacKenzie that these two are really “just concepts.” Phew.

Mazda CX-5

Marching Through Frankfurt: Design Thoughts on the 2011 Frankfurt Show image

Now here’s a good-looking little crossover. If you remember all the way back to the Geneva show, you’ll remember the Mazda Minagi concept. Basically, the CX-5 is the Minagi, minus the show car rearview wing cameras and that long strip of chrome that ran around the front and bisected the headlights. Taller than the CX-7, but smaller, the CX-5 is a good and solid-looking entry into a very crowded and competitive field. The difference will be in the application of Mazda’s new SkyActive tech, which should meld great performance with high MPG – especially the diesel with the manual, which our own Todd Lassa said is the SUV you want now. Trouble is – at least in the U.S. – you (probably) can’t get it. Shame, that.

Maserati Kubang

Uh… no.

Peugeot HX1 Concept

Well, hello there! At the end of the day, I’m a sucker for any car that’s long, low, and sleek, with a huge amount of space between the wheels. And Peugeot’s HX1 people-mover delivers that sort of shape in spades. But more than that, this six-passenger minivan alternative shows off a nice smattering of smart thinking. First off, there’s active aero everywhere.

Marching Through Frankfurt: Design Thoughts on the 2011 Frankfurt Show image

The headlights pop out to create drag coefficient lowering turbulence (0.31 cd to a slippery 0.29 cd). Beyond that, the funky wheels (my personal least favorite part) kick up some MPG-helping air. But the real active-aero highlight are the three spoilers found at the back of the roof. One sits up top, while the two others flank the D-pillars. Again, they not only help with reducing drag, but when you slam the brakes, they pop up Veyron-style to form a triple-blade air brake. Cool!

But that’s not all. Underneath the double (and suicide!) slanty gullwings sits a six passenger cabin. Two plus two plus two, with a twist. The middle row seats slide into the fronts seats when they’re not in use, giving the back row occupants Maybach-levels of legroom. This strikes me as particularly brilliant, because it doesn’t use up an ounce of floor space like a Stow’n Go type solution. Is it safe, legal? Who cares — pure concept! Great use of wood throughout, too. And this, friends, the Peugeot HX1, is why I love auto shows.

Marching Through Frankfurt: Design Thoughts on the 2011 Frankfurt Show imageKia GT Concept

Not content to sit back and let kissing cousin Hyundai reap all the RWD Korean fun, Kia has taken the gloves off to give us the GT Concept, an extremely stylized four-door that should swim in the same water as cars like the Audi A7 and Mercedes-Benz CLS. Overall I like the design, though I’m curious to see what a de-blinged non-show car version looks like. I’m just not that into the front intakes that flank the headlights. The Aston Martin One-77 features similar venting, but on the uber-car Aston, those intakes actually go into the carbon-fiber frame and feed the intake plenums. Here? Brake cooling, maybe?

The GT Concept’s best angle is from the side, though I do see some cribbed notes from the Jaguar XJ. I’m fine with that because as Woody Allen says, if you’re going to steal, steal from the best. I also like the copper accents that start in the A-pillars and then trail down the roof because, hey, show cars are supposed to be adventurous. The back is nice and tidy, though perhaps a little too slabby. I do like the big diffuser, however. Still, it works better than the busy, insect-like nose. Will they build it? Time (or a very friendly company insider) will tell. That said, I hope the twin-turbo 390-horsepower V-6 makes it into something.

Marching Through Frankfurt: Design Thoughts on the 2011 Frankfurt Show imageCitroen Tubik Concept

Look, if you love Citroens — the classic, awesome Citroens of yore — then your fancy was very much tickled by the hulking Tubik concept truck. Not only does it elicit warm fuzzies because of the resemblance to the tres hip Citroen H van, but it owes more than passing debt to the never-produced VW Microbus concept from a decade back, the one car Volkswagen really should’ve built. If you couldn’t care less about the distant past of European vanery, well, then the Tubik is not for you. As for me, I dig it, though I wish they’d spent a bit more time resolving the sides.

BMW i3 and i8

The first thing you need to do when looking at the i3 Concept is to imagine what it will look like with non-transparent doors. Do that and you’re left with quite a nice-looking city car. Especially as the global small CUV craze shows no signs at all of slowing down. The neatest attribute shared by both cars is the way the kidney grilles are three-dimensional, curving up and onto the hood. The effect is more dramatic on the larger i8 but it’s definitely present on the i3. Also, you’ve got to love the i3’s floating taillights. Reminds me of the ghosts from Pac-Man. I find the sleeker, sporty i8 much more attractive, and I also find it refreshing that it’s somewhat restrained. BMW could have slapped on 24-inch wagon wheels. They didn’t because A) they’re serious about their i sub-brand and B) they’re going to build this car. Just try and visualize what real doors will look like.

Marching Through Frankfurt: Design Thoughts on the 2011 Frankfurt Show image

There’s a load of clever design on hand with both cars, but the big take away is that while they don’t look like conventional cars, they don’t look preposterously far-fetched, either. The two represent a new milestone in production car materials. BMW had both the i3 and i8 concepts perched on a platform high above the rest of its products. I’m stealing this line from Moray Callum, but it was like looking at the future of the car, and then looking down on the past. The two concepts seem to be from a different century compared to the rest of BMW’s lineup. And peering into that future, these might be the two most significant cars of the entire show. Not so much for their electric powertrains, but because they just might usher in a new era of high-tech composite construction for the masses.


View the original article here

First Ride: 2012 Tesla Model S

As a handful of journalists snapped pictures, poked at touch screens, and flipped open the charging ports on the trio of preproduction (Betas, they call them) Model S's parked outside the Tesla (ex-NUMMI) factory in Fremont, California, I had one solitary thought:

None of this can be said about the Model S. In its base version, it'll cost $57,400 (add about $1950 for destination) and be eligible for a federal $7500 tax credit (and depending on where you live, additional local ones). Here in California, for instance, that means the price will be about $49,350 (after including our state $2500 tax credit as well). Not cheap, but there's a whole lot of vastly less interesting sedans out there that regularly sell for $49,350. (Don't make me name names.) Moreover, unlike the Volt and Leaf, the Model S's charger is part of the deal, built right into car.

While the Tesla Roadster has been unfairly labeled an electric Lotus (derived, perhaps), that won't happen with the Model S as virtually every spec of it is original. Overall, its presence struck me as something like a more organic Audi A7, meaning it's a stylishly windswept four-door fastback with a clear accent on performance. Parked side-by-side with the Audi, they're just about the same length, with the Tesla measuring an inch taller and wider. And like the Audi, the Model S is almost entirely aluminum, with bolding via adhesives, rivets, and welds, depending on the circumstance.

In fact, they're removable, five-belt child affairs, so their occupants' size is literally restricted by law. I actually climbed back there, but being considerably past child-seat age (when I was a kid, I used to stand on a front bench seat, for heaven's sake) all I could judge is that they're definitely close to the rear bumper. But no more so than the third row of many minivans. Would I put a kid there? Well, the seats do provide some flexibility in a pinch...and that's about it.


View the original article here

Saturday, 29 October 2011

Fisker Karma Scores 20 MPG, 2012 Fiat 500 Top Safety Pick: Car News Headlines

Newsletter Stay up to date on car reviews, buying guides, articles and more

Today around the High Gear Media network, we have a potpourri of news, including the 2012 Fisker Karma's official fuel economy ratings, an IIHS Top Safety Pick for the 2012 Fiat 500, and a look at whether the 2012 Chevrolet Volt or the 2012 Toyota Prius Plug-in hybrid is cheaper to drive. Catch all of these stories and more today in the links below.

2012 Fisker Karma scores 20 mpg in range-extended mode, has a 32-mile electric range.

Does Apple's new iPhone 4S work with the Nissan Leaf? Find out here.

Which is cheaper to operate, the 2012 Chevy Volt or the 2012 Toyota Prius plug-in hybrid?

The car dealership experience may actually be more important than ever in the Internet age.

The 2012 Mazda3 gets an all-new engine, and we show you what it's all about.

The 2012 Honda Insight gets new styling, improved gas mileage.

The 2012 Fiat 500 is an IIHS Top Safety Pick.

Kia is aiming to match or beat Volkswagen at its own game.

George Clooney pitches the Mercedes-Benz long-wheelbase E-Class in China.

Porsche's upcoming smaller crossover, the Cajun, will arrive in late 2013.

Buick makes Pandora Internet Radio standard across its whole lineup.


View the original article here

First Drive: 2012 Mercedes-Benz B-Class European Spec

2012 Mercedes Benz B Class Side In Motion Is a compact hatch too small for you, but a crossover too large? Have no fear, my spatially challenged friends. The 2012 Mercedes-Benz B-Class has been designed with your exact predicament in mind. It's being billed by Benz as a premium compact car that puts practicality first, and it's coming to the U.S. next year. When Mercedes says this car is all-new, it's not messing around - the B-Class features the largest amount of changed parts of any replacement model the German manufacturer has ever introduced. There are new four-cylinder gas and diesel engines, a revised seven-speed dual clutch gearbox, and stacks of new safety kit. More important than all that, though, is the B-Class' new front-drive platform - the same chassis that will underpin the new A-Class, a small SUV, a baby CLS four-door coupe, and a mystery fifth model. So it had better be good.

It's on the inside where the B-Class really ups its game. The seats slide and fold in a variety of ways, allowing you to easily cram in your particular combination of passengers and cargo, while the dash layout and materials are superb. SLS-inspired vents, made from solid chunks of metal, dominate the view, followed closely by a permanent tablet-style screen that rises out of the dash. Shell out a couple of thousand dollars and Mercedes will even hook it up with a 3G Internet connection.

Topping the completely new engine lineup is a 1.6-liter direct-injection turbocharged gasoline engine available with either 122 hp in the B180 or 156 hp in the B200. That might not sound like premium levels of power, but hold on to a gear, rev it toward redline, and there's plenty of shove for overtaking and maintaining your speed on the freeway - especially in the B200. All too often, though, the turbo was caught off-boost, at which point the engine bogged down and forced us reach for a lower gear or sit patiently, waiting for the turbo to spool up. It made the B-Class feel bigger, heavier, and more cumbersome than it is.

There was no such problem with the diesel engines. Both are 1.8-liter units derived from the 2.1-liter diesel engine found in the C-Class and E-Class, but modified with a shorter stroke. Available with either 109 hp in the B180 CDI or 136 hp in the B200 CDI, the extra torque meant throttle response was more instant and the engine was happier to be left in a higher gear. There's huge fuel efficiency gains too, of up to 21 percent compared to the outgoing car, helped by the addition of stop-start to every model in the range.

It's a curious mix, the Mercedes B-Class. When you consider the affluent families it's aimed at, the combination of an understated exterior, high-quality interior, and impressive functionality is well-judged. Drive it in isolation, though, and you can't help wishing it had a little more to offer dynamically. But considering the badge on the hood and the fact that it has no direct premium rivals, it's hard not to see flush families snapping up the B-Class.

2012 Mercedes-Benz B-Class European Spec Front-engine, FWD, 5-pass, 5-door, hatchback 1.6L/122-hp or 156-hp, four-cylinder turbo gasoline and 1.8L/109-hp or 136-hp, four-cylinder turbodiesel 6-speed manual or seven-speed twin-clutch auto


View the original article here

Long Term Update 2: 2011 Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid

MSRP: $47,700 - $106,000

MPG Range: 22 - 25 mpg

Body Style: SUV

Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.

View the original article here

First Test: 2012 Toyota Yaris SE

Why even talk about the "improved" acceleration?  The 0-60's were awful on past Yarii because you always tested an antiquated four-speed automatic.  Other magazines who had their hands on manual Yarii pulled off anywhere from 8.5 to 8.9 seconds.

The reality is the SE only performs better where they updated things-- braking and suspension/feeling.  Otherwise it's technically a slower car.  Depending on how many pieces can be mixed-n-matched with the old Yaris, I'd actually consider just buying a used Yaris hatch and throwing on the fun pieces to the lighter, less attention-gobbling package.  It'd likely cost the same to do it, but honestly it just seems more fun than having a factory built SE that I guarantee will be mostly gray-hairs behind the wheel.  Look at half the Scions and Yarii out there that went after the youth market and tell me differently.

Also, if you tested the $17k Yaris SE, why is the price as tested sitting at $15,055? (Fixed.  Thank you.)

Order
That's a pathetic excuse of a post!

What subcompact in the U.S. has a 2.0?
Oh.....

These cars are much lighter than compacts, and don't need larger engines, which would hurt, not help, their EPA.  Pay attention!
BD

pmirp
Well, you're wrong, and that's........ok.

9 seconds 0-60 is normal for this class.  Kia Rio and the base Sonic run that.  Fiesta is the slowest in the class.  And Fiesta is very expensive.  Easy to spend $20k

The base Sonic gets 25/35?  THAT'S not in the same class!

This car is fully competitive with all the new entries, except for the 6-speed.  But it's EPA and speed show it's not needed, just would be that much better to have.
BD

Is Toyota the new GM?

There was a time GM would not spend enough money on development of its smaller cars.

Looking at this Yaris, seeing how the interior is miserable still (though improved on 4th world interior of last year's), no six speed automatic, and not in same class as Sonic, Fiesta or Koreans, makes me believe that Toyota is not investing enough in their compact and sub-compact categories.

That is a shame.  Perhaps they think Prius will become the standard, but that is a very risky line they are running.  A line that lead to bankruptcy for GM, and one that now they are on, without improving their cheaper offerings in a bad economy to same standards as Ford or Koreans or GM

A better Yaris, but for $17k, a 6-speed slushbox should be there.

And that would get it to 40MPG, too.
BD

it looks good. just needs a little more power. i don't know why toyota and honda like 106hp so much. they have been offering cars with 106hp for donkey years!

toyota should make an awd version of this with a 1.6 turbo! wishful thinking lol. it looks like a little rally car. i love it!


View the original article here

GM Network Hacked To Make Fun Of Rivals At 2013 Spark Unveiling -- Update

2013 Chevrolet Spark minicar unveiled in Detroit, October 2011

2013 Chevrolet Spark minicar unveiled in Detroit, October 2011

Enlarge Photo Newsletter Stay up to date on car reviews, buying guides, articles and more

General Motors' web-wide blast of new cars and technology today has made quite an impression, but a prank--or at least what is being called a prank--at the company's Detroit headquarters today has left a different sort of mark--both on GM and on the prankster.

A Wi-Fi router providing Internet access to some parts of the building was apparently modified to insert the word "sucks" after any mention of Ford, Chrysler, Honda, or Toyota--on any webpage accessed through that connection. The prankster was a subcontractor that installed the router, and although GM has declined to identify the business or the installer, GM spokesman Selim Bingol told the Wall Street Journal, "These guys are learning the definition of sucks."

Bingol earlier called the incident, "not funny," and said the problem had been fixed.

The prank was timed to coincide with this morning's unveiling of the 2013 Chevrolet Spark.

Only the one network is said to have been affected, and given that it was a wireless router that was the source of the nefarious text, it's possible the prank was pulled by someone outside the company.



View the original article here

Comparison: 2012 Hyundai Sonata GLS vs. 2012 Toyota Camry LE vs. 2012 Volkswagen Passat SE

What I don't understand is how the Sonata, with the most HP and best power to weight ratio, is not faster than the Camry. As well as this, it got by far the worst mileage out of the three, when it should have been closer to the Camry's, if the EPA ratings were accurate. All of Hyundai's new cars seem this way too. They all look the best on paper, but don't work out to real world results. I would never buy a Camry, under any circumstances.  It's just not a good car, in my opinion.

Having said that, nothing in this segment is a Ferrari or a Porsche.  What people want in a midsize is, apparently, an appliance with a little-- just a little-- zing.  I have to give kudos to Hyundai for trying to provide just that.  I think that's why it's polling at #1.  The Passat is also offering a little extra zing with its European style and German handling.  That's why it's #2.  The Camry is pure appliance.  You don't stand in front of your refrigerator and admire it.  You only want it to keep stuff cold.

I thought it was a good and well laid out article.  The Pasat is a nice car.  It looks sharp and the I5 gets dumped on a lot, but it isn't too bad.  The 6-spd Shiftronic is an excellent transmission.  The Pasat has the same power train in my Jetta, is bigger, and is lighter...a good combination.  VW knows how to make their cars fun to drive.

I was kind of surprised to see how much the Camry outperformed the Sonata when comparing automatic to automatic.  If I were to buy a car in this comparison, it would be the Camry or the Sonata.  I have driven the Sonata several times in multiple trim levels and the turbo, and it is an excellent car.  However, its steering feel is bad, but not as bad as last generation's Camry (unless you are talking about the turbo which is even worse).  Also, the seats, while initially comfortable, are too wide and flat to get comfortable for a nice long drive.  Ingress and egress is slighly more difficult, but nothing noticeable.

BD, it's nothing in comparison to the pile of cash you've amassed being wrong.  So far I haven't heard you say one thing that wasn't straight out of the Toyota playbook.

What dealership do you work at?

"Ocellaris..stop living in the past, this is not the early 2000s. VW's quality numbers still lag behind those of Toyota and Hyundai."

People confuse initial quality with long term quality.  I would not argue that VW trails Hyundai in initial quality, however my concern is what happens to the Hyundais 5+ years down the road.

Very few people drive an "old" Hyundai because they didn't last.  I live in the Northeast and less than a decade ago, the roads were positively bursting with people buying new Hyundais they got on the cheap.  There are a few volume Hyundai dealers in the area and they didn't have trouble selling them.  If you look around now, there are still a ton of early 2000s VW on the road and all of the Hyundais are gone and dead.  If you do see one, bumpers are hanging off, the paint is fading and peeling, and the interior is trashed.  People just presume these new Hyundais will last a long time because they look good, and people equate looks with quality.

BD, you're in denial.  The Passat didn't lose this comparison.  It won.  Admit it.

You're also in sales and you work for Toyota.  I'll bet you money on it.

Jetta has lucked out, with the tsunami slowing down Corolla and Civic.  Many companies have benefitted from an Act of God, handicapping the two leaders.  Chevy Cruze as well is a big winner, but it got help.

It's early!  Calm down!  After all the dust has settled, VW will be the bottom-feeders we all know and ignore.

(No matter how hard MT works to get them over.....and this was a work!)

Sonata is a full-size car in EPA, Camry and Passat are midsized.  You need to study....
BD

@BD:

you are such a shill that you dont even understand how success is measured. In the US Toyota is FAR bigger than VW. The fact that VW is now selling 13-15k Jettas a month is a huge win for VW considering their size in this market. Its about marketshare trends- Jetta's is way up and Corollas is down. VW doesnt have the production capacity on lineup size to compete with Toyota in total sales in the US. They dont even make trucks which automatically keeps them on a lower tier in terms of US sales. And BTW, the Jetta has been running at about 75% of the sales of the class leaders in 2011, not 50% of their sales. Remember, Corolla and civic have fallen off big time and Cruze has been averaging around 20k units a month for the last few months. Also, aside from the Fusion and Malibu we dont have confirmation that any new midsizers debut in 2012. Its speculation that a new accord might show up- has not been confirmed. How did the Passat lose in roominess? what review are YOU reading?

syj
Jetta will sell 150k, which is not a failure, or a success.  The top sellers double that.  Jetta just looks like, and drives like, a failure.  Ask anyone who drove the last one.  Car & Driver couldn't rag on it more.  Last in their 5 car comparison.

Passat will be last starting next year, when the other cars are redesigned.

This car was beaten by BOTH the Camry and Sonata.  Very shady decision by MT.  It lost in price, power, efficiency, roominess, value, speed, etc.  It won handling.  

That's good enough for 3rd, not 1st place.  Admit it.
BD

@BD:

There wasnt even a 2011 passat- one reason "no one" cared about it. People will care about this one. Im sure if people went back and read your comments about the Jetta you probably repeated all the same trollish nonsense and predicted it would fail. Its been selling like hotcakes. And as others have noted, Toyota is a bit player in Europe and far behind VW and GM in china. Toyota does well in Japan and in the US. VW will outsell Toyota this year globally, they are not to be taken lightly.

@techie

MT doesnt rate cars by reliability- never have.

You never answered the question.  Do you work for Toyota?

Plenty of people care about the Passat here, and for good reason.  It's a great car.

Like so many Toyota worshippers, you used sales numbers to try to justify the Camry's greatness.  But, as usual, when presented with evidence of the Passat outselling the Camry, suddenly you don't care about sales figures.

Adam
Why would I give a monkey's hairy sac about what happens in Europe?

HERE, nobody cares about Passat, and with good reason......
BD

BD, do you work for Toyota?

VW outsells Toyota in Europe by a huge margin.  (The only company that comes close to VW sales in Europe is Ford.)  The Golf sold almost 500,000 units in Europe-- more than double what Camry sold in the U.S.  In Europe, the Passat is in the Top 10.  The Camry isn't in the Top 50.

If numbers tell the story let's look at ALL the numbers, not just the ones that favor Toyota.

Adam
Are you trying to set a record for biggest reach?

VW is not comparable to Toyota in quality.  Hasn't been for DECADES.  This ain't 1963.  

This car will sell 1/3 of Camry next year.  Why?  Because people assume it is made like crap.  It's earned that much respect......
BD

"Sonata is legitimate competition to Camry.  Passat not so much.......  

...
3.  And VW's crap-tastic quality rep will be a blow from which it will never recover."

How do people keep bashing on VW quality while forgetting that just a few years ago, Hyundai was making JUNK cars for sale in the state.  In northern states it is rare to see ANY Hyundai on the road more than 6 or 7 years old because they all rusted out and fell apart.  

VW had a bad quality run with MKIV Jettas in the early 2000s (along with some other issues), however its been fairly solid since then.  Meanwhile Hyundai was selling complete trash across their entire lineup in the early 2000s and now they get a free pass on reliability?!?

"Toyota has been building reliable cars for about 25 years
Hyundai?  About 5 years
VW hasn't even started yet......."

VW has been building reliable cars for about 80 years.  During a timespan that long you're bound to have a few ups and downs along the way.

Like Toyota.  Did you know their quality got so bad at one point they actually left the U.S. market for an entire year?  

Can't say that about VW.

"You do know that they tested a Camry with less responsive smaller wheels, right?"

The Camry comes with smaller, less responsive wheels because that is the way Toyota chooses to equip it.  Don't blame MT.  Blame Toyota.

@chiguy:

Exactly- and when will these folks realize that MT does NOT rank cars in reliability? This is obvious. the majority of the fanboys are saying "the Camry may not be a better car in this test, but the VW will break down so the camry should've won". What? MT isnt in the business of predicting reliability of new cars. IN fact, CR doesnt even rate cars based on reliability. They give them a road test score and then if the car scores high enough its recommended if the reliability is there. They do NOT base their scores on predicted reliability though.

The Passat wins again!

The VW haters must be foaming at the mouth . . .

@ ChiGuy, Here you go.

"In terms of power, interior space, useability, and fuel economy, the Camry's the best here,"

You do know that they tested a Camry with less responsive smaller wheels, right?

As soon as I saw a Camry in this test, I knew the usual shills for Toyota would be chiming in. I am of course referring to Jimmy and Black Dynamite. Keep drinking the Kool-Aid and I hope you're comfy under the bridge.

For them and the others wondering why their beloved Camry didn't win, read the quote from the article.

Let's just say the Camry returned some middling scores in a few key areas. First, we were unimpressed with its "architectural statement" styling, whose elements lacked cohesion and had an overall look too similar to that of its predecessor. Next, the soft suspension, while great for road trips, was not terribly assuring over the handling loop. "In the tighter sections of our drive, the Camry was not confidence-inspiring," declared Kong. Last, for $23,260 to start, the Toyota omitted such standard niceties as alloy wheels, which were included in our as-tested $22,405 Hyundai as well as a $23,460 Passat S with Appearance Package (our $25,595 SL came with larger 17-inch alloys)

BTW, what is the point of 5 cylinders, if it's less powerful, and less efficient, than 4-cylinders?

Motor Trend didn't justify a Passat victory at all!  
It lost in every way.  Efficiency, power, speed, price, value,  etc.....
BD

Syj says

"Your ignorance is astounding. You should really stop posting.
1. VW's sales are up because they are following the Toyota/Honda philophy- worry about value and inoffensive styling instead of plush interiors and lux features."

You be happy to know i considered your suggestion and decided to continue to post.  I can't stop posting & let your misrepresent facts & cloud smart people's judgment.

Accord and Camry lost market share this year because of the natural event and shortage of parts.  They also have lost some market share because of improvements in Sonata and Optima.  Has nothing to do with VW Passat which was just re-designed.

Luxury features of a VW? you got to be kidding.  Feel the interior of Jeta.  Checkout the engine of a VW.  Camry brought a six speed automatic to market as soon as GM and Ford forced its hands and also Sonata and Optima.  It has a great engine, as good a V4 as an Accord.  To me those are still the best V4s.  No they don't have DI but not needed

1. Passat - Questionable engineering and the styling of a bar of Dove soap. Pass
2. Toyota Camry - Well rounded, reliable, built for the sheep of the driving world. Pass
3. Sonata - Hyudai's rising star looks the part but doesn't have the performance to back it up. Pass

Well it's nice to know that I can still avoid these cars and wont be missing anything. NEXT!

So many euro fanbois :\

Regardless, the Sonata is the one winning.  Just look outside at a street corner near you.  Forget this review.

@pmirp:

Your ignorance is astounding. You should really stop posting.
1. VW's sales are up because they are following the Toyota/Honda philophy- worry about value and inoffensive styling instead of plush interiors and lux features.
2. Even CR notes VWs reliability has improved
3. VWs recent models (Jetta and CC) have been successful so there is no reason to doubt the Passat
4. Camry and Accord have lost significant share over the last few years and even CR doesnt rate either sedan as best in class.
5. Toyota doesnt use state of art powertrains in anything not called Lexus. The Camrys engine is basically the same one its had for years. At least the Sonata has direct injection.

Camry got over 34 MPG during their test?
Nice!

I guess that's why it's The People's Champion!
BD

Consider this: for less money than this Passat, you could buy a Sonata SE 2.0T ($25,405) or a Camry XLE ($25,485). Both come with far more options / amentities than the Passat tested here.

MT, if you're going to do a comparison test, please bring comparable vehicle.

Old people buy the Camry.

The younger, hip generation buys the Passat. Many people are willing to compromise a few mpg in order to have a more comfortable, better feeling car.

MotorTrend, how about doing a hard-core reliability test? Take a few different cars/engines and put them through some extreme (Top Gear-esque) testing to find out just how reliable/durable these cars are. I'd love to see VW's 2.5L and 2.0T dispell the myth that VW's aren't reliable.

Syj says:
"Wake up, VW is on the rise. Not everyone buys cars based on CR rankings even if you chose to do so. VWs sales are way up and the PAssat will sell. "

Syj, on what planet do you live on?  People who buy mid-size cars review CR because reliability matters.  They don't want cars in the shop constantly.  Until VW improves that, they stand no chance.  

Their sales increased, because of price reductions to make their cars more competitive with Camry and Koreans.  In process they have moved away from attributes that they have pushed for years (performance of their 2.0 turbo and quality materials).  Now they got nothing left.  

I admit Passat is a competitive product from quality of interior and design, but not so much from a engine perspective.  Until they invest in modern engine technology like Camry and Koreans, they stand zero chance.  And until they improve quality year over year, they will come in last.

Now go study some more about virtues that sell mid-size family cars in US before posting

FullMonte:
I agree with you about the lack of colour imagination currently expressed by most manufacturers.  One of the cars I recently looked at came in only six flavours: black, white, red, and what amounts to three shades of grey: silver, light grey, and dark grey. Kinda boring.

Maybe if Fiat is successful in the U.S., we'll start seeing a more diverse colour pallete. While I have no interest in buying a Fiat 500, it does come in over a dozen colours, including cappucino and some of the others you mentioned.

Sonata is legitimate competition to Camry.  Passat not so much.......  

1.  The average buyer won't weight the test drive heavily on handling.  
2.  The Passats 22/31, with less 8 fewer HP than Camry will hurt the sales pitch.
3.  And VW's crap-tastic quality rep will be a blow from which it will never recover.  

It's pretty obvious that Camry was the better car, but MT wanted something else to win.  Using the "If you squint, you can see an A8" is pretty desperate.  Good luck with that!

Speed, economy, reputation, roomy, lightweight
Toyota Camry still reigns as The People's Champion.  
BD

@ Mirage1987

It isn't the Germans fault they make superior vehicles, the others need to step their games up. Of these 3, the VW is the only one I'd even consider getting, just because it's German made which equals engineering superiority and it looks great (relatively).

@supervette:

Sonata has consistently been in the 8 sec range in 0-60. It doesnt perform as well as expected considering its power to weight ratio. Fastest time I've seen is 7.8s. Its barely faster than the Verano which weighs more and packs only 180hp.

@pmirp:

Wake up, VW is on the rise. Not everyone buys cars based on CR rankings even if you chose to do so. VWs sales are way up and the PAssat will sell. Lots of people like VWs styling, interiors and diesel engines. We arent in the 90s anymore, the days of people thinking that you have to buy a camry or Accord to get a sedan that will last more than 50k miles are over. The myth has been shattered and the Passat will only help VW post even larger sales gains in 2012.

The real world mileage of the sonata in this test isnt impressive at all. Hyundais continue to underachieve in real world mileage testing. On paper, the sonata is considerably more efficient than the Passat.

In real world a VW is not even on the same planet as Sonata or Camry.

When it comes to reliability, the marketplace does not recognize VW as a leader.  Reputation counts for a lot and that is where Camry has VW and Sonata beat.

VW with yesteryear engine technology, only has Camry beat by virtue of better wheels and tires.  This is a very superficial comparison.

Until the day VW proves its reliability figures year in and year out, as you state, Camry is number 1 in sales for a reason.

Also when it comes to overall numbers this year for Camry and other Japanese cars, one has to remember the limitations on capacity as result of natural disaster.  All to say, we don't know what happens next year, except, VW has zero chance of being in top 3 among mid-size cars.  

Kind of an embarrassing conclusion to your story, don't you say? Shades of Motor Trends past when you picked Honda Insight over Toyota Prius


View the original article here

Long Term Update 2: 2011 Honda Odyssey

2011 Honda Odyssey Rear Three Quarters Los Angeles does not have the smoothest road surfaces in the world. Sure, some cars have a ride so soft and plush you barely notice the gaping seams between the concrete slabs, or the cavernous potholes. The Odyssey is not one of these vehicles. Don't get me wrong; driving this minivan is not a jarring, back-breaking experience. However, the Honda Odyssey transfers more road feel and noise than I would prefer. The suspension is stiff enough to keep this minivan from wallowing over bumps and dips, but instead I feel and hear the road, and I wish it could be quieter. I love using the Hands-free Bluetooth connection with my cell phone to make calls, but with all that interior noise, I feel like I end up yelling to get the other person on the line to hear me. Conversations with passengers tend to be at a higher decibel level, too.


View the original article here

Friday, 28 October 2011

Long Term Update 3: 2011 Kia Optima SX

2011 Kia Optima SX Rear Three Quarters In Motion When Kia first started making cars it was known for three things: soft styling, soft suspension and small seats. We have already discussed how it has dramatically changed the styling of its all new Optima, but did they do anything about the seats and suspension? Short answer, yes, but let's look at what they have done. For far too long Kia seats, specifically the seat bottoms were far too small for our larger American frames. They always felt flat with nothing to support your thighs on the sides or from beneath. It was an extreme case of sitting on the seat, not in it. But, just like the styling, Kia has completely changed its seats.

Now, with the good comes the bad, and there is some bad about the Optima's seats. Kia took one page from the Germans they should have skipped, the one that says all seats that give you support must be very firm (Audi, Porsche). Now, not all the German manufacturers make their seats firm, some have managed to craft supportive seats that are also comfortable (BMW). Kia could have taken the route of the latter, but unfortunately it didn't, hence we have larger, more supportive, but hard seats.


View the original article here