Volkswagen, as you likely know, roughly translates to "people's car" in German. Decades ago, what it really meant was the Beetle, an inexpensive means of getting four people and a bit of cargo to their destination. Today, it means the Up!, which carries the same mission statement. I owned a 1967 Beetle. It was my first car, and my dad figured I couldn't get into much trouble with it (only spun it once!). I had that car for years and it made a lasting impression on me, but as I was driving the new Up! through the streets of Rome, my rusty old Bug wasn't the car I was thinking about. It was the third-gen Geo/Chevy Metro three-door hatch I drove to deliver pizzas in college. After all, that was a "people's car," too, and much more comparable to the Up!.Stop rolling your eyes and keep reading. I'm fully aware of the Metro's reputation, and I'm not using it to insult the Up!. The Metro was a better car than it got credit for being. Do recall that it lasted over 15 years and three generations. At its peak, the Canadian plant that built the Metro was cranking out more than 100,000 cars a year. For as much grief as the Metro gets, it was a fairly popular car in its day. And let's not forget just a few years ago, during the gas price panic of 2008, people were paying thousands of dollars for used Metros that still achieved as much as 50 mpg.The Up! is like that, but better. A lot better. Unlike the Metro, the Up! is a pretty stylish little car, if you're into German minimalism. The funky lines in the fascias and window borders bleed European postmodernism, as does the always-blacked-out, all-glass rear hatch. Love it or hate it, you certainly won't miss it. Me, I'm still trying to decide whether it's grinning or if it's been gagged.More than just better-looking than the Metro, the Up! is a better-quality car. The materials, though rather inexpensive by Volkswagen standards, aren't even close to the worst we've seen in a sub-$15,000 car. The fit and finish is certainly up to Volkswagen standards. Also considerably better than the Metro is the Up!'s ride quality and NVH. The ride is a bit firm, befitting its German roots, but it still handled Rome's bumpy cobblestone streets nicely. If ride comfort were the only measure of a car, I'd have rather been driving those streets in the Up! than the Ferrari 599 I saw enduring them.Aside from being a small, inexpensive, three-door hatch, the likeness between the Up! and Metro struck me most while driving it. Both cars are powered by inline three-cylinder engines (though the Metro later came with an optional four-cylinder) and standard manual transmissions. Each offered two three-cylinder engine options making almost the same power, 60 horsepower for the base Up! and 75 horsepower for the top models, 5 more in both respects than the Metro. As you'd expect, all models are rather slow by American standards. After all, with a quoted 0-to-60 mph time of 13.2 seconds, the Up! would lose a drag race with a Smart Fortwo by nearly half a second. Of course, all of these cars are designed to be big city runabouts, not race cars, and as such they're all geared to provide adequate acceleration up to about 40 mph.Driving through the manic streets of Rome, the Up! never felt under-powered in traffic. After all, when you're doing the stop-and-go shuffle through city streets and topping out at 35 mph, you don't need a lot of muscle under the hood. Some of that's due to the throttle mapping -- in the high-powered model there was no difference in acceleration between 50-percent throttle and 100-percent throttle. Interestingly, the base engine was the exact opposite. The only time the Up! felt truly slow was merging on the highway and when trying to climb a steep hill, an arduous process in second gear with the pedal melded to the floor. That may have been the exact moment I was transported back to my pizza-schlepping days.Like the Metro and original Beetle before it, the Up! is a strikingly honest car. It tries to be nothing more than a stylish, inexpensive mode of transportation, and at that it excels. At the right price point, in the right markets, it might actually succeed at being the wildly popular Beetle incarnate the conservative Polo never was. In Germany at a price just under 10,000 euros, it should prove pretty tempting.But is America one of those markets? At the moment, Volkswagen doesn't seem to think so, as there are no plans to bring the car here. Three-door hatchbacks just don't do well in this market. There is, however, a five-door version coming soon. Could that car make it in America? That depends largely on how good the automated manual transmission is and what price Volkswagen can sell it for. Directly translated, the Up! would cost about $13,000 in America. Is it $2000 better than a base model Nissan Versa? That depends on how much style is worth to you. If Volkswagen can ship the five-door to America with 25 more horsepower and an even lighter price tag, it might just work. After all, a lot of Metros and original Beetles found homes in this country despite the presence of bigger, faster, nicer cars. And hey, near-Prius fuel economy for half the price is hard for even most stubborn American to argue with, especially in this economy.Front-engine, FWD, 5-pass, 3-door or 5-door hatchback 1.0L/60-hp or 75-hp DOHC 12-valve I-3 5-speed manual, 5-speed auto-clutch automatic
Showing posts with label Volkswagen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Volkswagen. Show all posts
Sunday, 27 November 2011
Second Take: 2012 Volkswagen Up!
Volkswagen, as you likely know, roughly translates to "people's car" in German. Decades ago, what it really meant was the Beetle, an inexpensive means of getting four people and a bit of cargo to their destination. Today, it means the Up!, which carries the same mission statement. I owned a 1967 Beetle. It was my first car, and my dad figured I couldn't get into much trouble with it (only spun it once!). I had that car for years and it made a lasting impression on me, but as I was driving the new Up! through the streets of Rome, my rusty old Bug wasn't the car I was thinking about. It was the third-gen Geo/Chevy Metro three-door hatch I drove to deliver pizzas in college. After all, that was a "people's car," too, and much more comparable to the Up!.Stop rolling your eyes and keep reading. I'm fully aware of the Metro's reputation, and I'm not using it to insult the Up!. The Metro was a better car than it got credit for being. Do recall that it lasted over 15 years and three generations. At its peak, the Canadian plant that built the Metro was cranking out more than 100,000 cars a year. For as much grief as the Metro gets, it was a fairly popular car in its day. And let's not forget just a few years ago, during the gas price panic of 2008, people were paying thousands of dollars for used Metros that still achieved as much as 50 mpg.The Up! is like that, but better. A lot better. Unlike the Metro, the Up! is a pretty stylish little car, if you're into German minimalism. The funky lines in the fascias and window borders bleed European postmodernism, as does the always-blacked-out, all-glass rear hatch. Love it or hate it, you certainly won't miss it. Me, I'm still trying to decide whether it's grinning or if it's been gagged.More than just better-looking than the Metro, the Up! is a better-quality car. The materials, though rather inexpensive by Volkswagen standards, aren't even close to the worst we've seen in a sub-$15,000 car. The fit and finish is certainly up to Volkswagen standards. Also considerably better than the Metro is the Up!'s ride quality and NVH. The ride is a bit firm, befitting its German roots, but it still handled Rome's bumpy cobblestone streets nicely. If ride comfort were the only measure of a car, I'd have rather been driving those streets in the Up! than the Ferrari 599 I saw enduring them.Aside from being a small, inexpensive, three-door hatch, the likeness between the Up! and Metro struck me most while driving it. Both cars are powered by inline three-cylinder engines (though the Metro later came with an optional four-cylinder) and standard manual transmissions. Each offered two three-cylinder engine options making almost the same power, 60 horsepower for the base Up! and 75 horsepower for the top models, 5 more in both respects than the Metro. As you'd expect, all models are rather slow by American standards. After all, with a quoted 0-to-60 mph time of 13.2 seconds, the Up! would lose a drag race with a Smart Fortwo by nearly half a second. Of course, all of these cars are designed to be big city runabouts, not race cars, and as such they're all geared to provide adequate acceleration up to about 40 mph.Driving through the manic streets of Rome, the Up! never felt under-powered in traffic. After all, when you're doing the stop-and-go shuffle through city streets and topping out at 35 mph, you don't need a lot of muscle under the hood. Some of that's due to the throttle mapping -- in the high-powered model there was no difference in acceleration between 50-percent throttle and 100-percent throttle. Interestingly, the base engine was the exact opposite. The only time the Up! felt truly slow was merging on the highway and when trying to climb a steep hill, an arduous process in second gear with the pedal melded to the floor. That may have been the exact moment I was transported back to my pizza-schlepping days.Like the Metro and original Beetle before it, the Up! is a strikingly honest car. It tries to be nothing more than a stylish, inexpensive mode of transportation, and at that it excels. At the right price point, in the right markets, it might actually succeed at being the wildly popular Beetle incarnate the conservative Polo never was. In Germany at a price just under 10,000 euros, it should prove pretty tempting.But is America one of those markets? At the moment, Volkswagen doesn't seem to think so, as there are no plans to bring the car here. Three-door hatchbacks just don't do well in this market. There is, however, a five-door version coming soon. Could that car make it in America? That depends largely on how good the automated manual transmission is and what price Volkswagen can sell it for. Directly translated, the Up! would cost about $13,000 in America. Is it $2000 better than a base model Nissan Versa? That depends on how much style is worth to you. If Volkswagen can ship the five-door to America with 25 more horsepower and an even lighter price tag, it might just work. After all, a lot of Metros and original Beetles found homes in this country despite the presence of bigger, faster, nicer cars. And hey, near-Prius fuel economy for half the price is hard for even most stubborn American to argue with, especially in this economy.Front-engine, FWD, 5-pass, 3-door or 5-door hatchback 1.0L/60-hp or 75-hp DOHC 12-valve I-3 5-speed manual, 5-speed auto-clutch automatic 
Saturday, 12 November 2011
First Drive: 2012 Volkswagen Scirocco TDI
Would it make you feel better if I told all you, my fellow Americans, that the Scirocco is nothing more than a Golf with a steeper windshield? What if I said the wider stance, just under an inch and a half in front and almost two and half inches in the rear, makes no difference at all? What about it being an inch and quarter lower -- that can't make any difference, right? If it helps you sleep better, I will tell you all these things -- but they aren't true. Since the Scirocco's re-release in 2008, American VW fans have been clamoring for a chance to own one. It may be just another example of us complaining that we don't get all the good stuff, or maybe VW was worried they would fly off lots like the new Jetta. With the GTI and the Scirocco's European and U.K. pricing so similar, VW may be concerned that instead of attracting new buyers, the Scirocco would take sales away from everyone's favorite hot hatch.Getting over 200 kph is almost too easy. There is no drama, very little noise, and certainly no feeling of danger. Again, very unlike older Sciroccos that felt like setting a speed record at anything over 100 mph. Sadly, the car is electronically limited to 220 kph, roughly 137 mph, although the speedometer did show just a little more than that. Making all this even sweeter is that it's all completely legal. Sausage, beer, castles, gummy bears, great drivers, unlimited sections of the Autobahn -- there is just so much to love about Germany.Friday, 11 November 2011
Comparison: 2011 Hyundai Sonata SE 2.0T vs 2012 Toyota Camry SE V-6 vs 2012 Volkswagen Passat VR6 SEL
the current Passat has nothing to do with the old one. People are claiming the old Passat was a POS (no proof is being offered) and thus MT should rank this one lower. That is nonsense. We know NOTHING about the reliability of the new Passat and whose to say reliability should be the #1 factor? Cars have warranties for a reason and some folks lease cars and thus could care less about 100k mile durability. This is NOT a ranking of potential reliability or maintenance costs. In fact, none of the major magazines/sites take reliability into account when ranking cars. Think people, how many years has Camry been number 1? How many years has Toyota made reliable cars in every category, and the reverse, VW made unreliable cars in every category?
Just point out the multiple errors and hypocrisy
I know who's pocket MT is in now.......
Now we are to believe a first year transplant, made in America car that is dumbed down for America, with an older technology engine that is not even sold in other VWs much longer, and is imported to America not even built here, and then inserted into the VW, is better than a homegrown entirely made in America Camry.
Let me tell you, every time that oxygen sensor light comes on, every time the rattles in the dashboard drive you nuts, every time the heater coil breaks in zero degree temperature and radiator coolant leaks, and every time you realize no corner Good Year or Firestone is able or willing to touch this low tech VW, you would hate the moment you made a decision to purchase it.
To compare a VW Passat in any trim to a Camry and proclaim it a better car in its first year, is the height of irresponsibility
Just FYI for those complaining about the price difference for Sonata...As someone already mentioned, the trim level tested does not have Navi or leather interior for beginners. Who knows? Maybe this was way of Hyundai saying "Hey, at least we're selling it cheap!" You don't compare Hyundai to VW. It is only a matter of time before Hyundai is exposed for their style over substance approach.
BD,I don't know what you mean by the VW was slowest BY FAR in all the other tests. Hm, let's see. It lost from 0-30 and 0-40 but then the Camry starts losing ground and is overall beat by the VW in the quarter mile but we'll say it was basically a tie. Then we check everything else. Figure 8, lateral gs and breaking is one pretty easily by the V dub. after all the stats which show the Passat fastest not just in a straight line (call it a tie fine) but around the bends (this time definitely beating both competitors) we look at the road test. It didn't sound to me like MT had any trouble deciding who won in everything in that test. Ride comfort, refinement, enjoyment to drive, quality, everything. And the interior is by far better especially compared to the clearly cheap toyota's. So you put that all together with VW's new rep for quality and Toyota's new rep of not-so-great quality then you understand the price difference. You pay for a better car and its worth it compared to outdated cheap and bring
"Toyota isn't losing sleep over Passat. They may not even know it's been redesigned....."Hopefully they'll sleep right up until the end.
BD,Quote from the article
Away from the test track, the Passat VR6 didn't lose any luster. Over our 30-mile drive loop, we scored it the highest in ride, road feel, refinement, and roominess.
BD,What part of "fun to drive" don't you understand? This has been a factor in all 3 comparisons.
@GT-keithWhich is why I really think they should consider using an Optima next time. I also recently spent time in a rental Sonata (445 miles in 7 days), as well as a rental Optima (1463 miles in 11 days) and the Optima was a better experience all around. I didn't have any violent shaking issues in the Sonata (and it had almost 30,000 on the odo), but it still didn't provide as good of an experience.
Congratulations to Volkswagen for listening to the public and taking a huge risk in building a car that was sure to alienate some longtime VW buyers but might turn out to be a hit with the general public.And kudos to Motor trend for putting the Passat in this comparison in the first place, and having the guts to call it like they see it.
Seems the ringers Hyundai likes to throw at comparisons didn't make it to this one. That is why we see these times and the true driving dynamics, or should I say lack there of, and near bottom FE.Poor fanboys can't accept the truth. Which is, Hyundai, and their cheerleaders over hype the products.
First of all, these times appear to be from automatics and the Pasat and Camry put up some super impressive straight line times. I think that Camry has the superior engine but VW has the superior transmission. If a Camry handled anything close to a VW, it would be my choice of the bunch given Toyota's well-deserved reputation for reliability. Then again, if you drive a VW, they are easy to fall in love with. How else could VW still be in business with all of the reliability gremlins they have had with virtually every car after the original, rock-solid reliability Beetle.I think what is lost is how unimpressive the 2.0T from Hyundai is. I think MT was overly kind on the handling dynamics of the 2.0T. It has the WORST handling feel of any car in this segment. If anything, the 2.0T throws of the balance of the car and makes an already suspect handling car have a handling feel that is like driving a poor handling bumper car.
VRJust point out the multiple errors and hypocrisy
Fortunately, few people are dumb enough to buy a VW as a daily driver, so if VW sells 125k next year, especially after the new Malibu, Altima and Accord have their say, they should throw some type of over-the-top celebration.
Toyota isn't losing sleep over Passat. They may not even know it's been redesigned.....
BD
If there's a bigger wiener out there, I've yet to meet him. All you do is complain.
Hey, did you hear that VW is going to be the largest automaker by the end of the year? Yup, you heard right. Toyota dropped behind VW AND GM this year. They're boring, and as MotorTrend noted in this comparison test, the Camry isn't as awesome as it used to be.
It's funny, all the negativity about VW reliability. Give me a break. You're all just pissed that this "inferior" car has bested the untouchable Camry.
I don't get what MT's obsession with the Hyundai Sonata is for all their comparisons, especially when they can't even bother to get a fully loaded one that competes more directly with the Passat they used.You'd think they'd just use the Kia Optima they have in their long term fleet. It's fully loaded, turbocharged, and the general consensus among auto journalists is that it's a better car than the Sonata anyway. The fact that they get subpar 0-60 times in either vehicle seems to only be a problem they have. Something strange is going on here. I actually like the new Passat and Camry, but it seems MT is not going all in with their third player.
JeremyJames86 - Today 10:54 AMI agree with everyone on the west coast waking up 4 hours after New Jersey.
$33K you get get a lot better rides than a veedub:
- Infiniti G Sedan
- Cadillac CTS Sport Sedan
- Lexus ES350
well... fella, you'd end up with a stripped one.
Had to point out a clear error in the article:"Add that to its being the quickest and most fun to drive, and you have is a sedan unmatched in its class."
Clearly, the Camry matched it in speed. It beat the Passat to 30 MPH, and to 100MPH, and matched it in the quarter, so Passat cannot be considered "unmatched" if the Camry ran with the more expensive car step-for-step.
The Passat IS unmatched in price, efficiency, and value. The Camry and Sonata had better MPG at much lower costs, presenting much better values to the consumer.......
BD
Is value a factor or not (Again, we are talking about family sedans)? Isn't that what a family is looking for in a V6 family sedan? Is THAT the car they would choose? Is THAT the car you would recommend?
Oh........
BD
The cars you mentioned start around $37k and the CTS has 270ho for that amount. While you can get some luxury models in the $33k range- they wont be loaded and they wont have 280hp. The Passat is loaded for that amount of money.
How come people have trouble understanding that MT cannot always get the exact model they want? All the mags complain about this when staging comparos. You have to take what is available from the manufacturers. I also dont get all the comments saying "how can a VW Passat be ranked over a Camry?". What rule sales a VW cant beat a Toyota? If the Passat was the most impressive in this trio than it should be ranked #1.
Agreed with Church123It's like MT went to the same deceptive marketing seminar as GM did.
It is clear now that the Camry is the true winner of all 3 comparos.1. Base Model test: Camry outperformed all
2. Hybrid/Diesel MPG: Camry wins again
3. Performance: Camry is on par with Passat for less and is the most efficient
Or how an entry level, everyman's Camry gets compared to Passat SE and is criticized for having too soft a ride and not enough grip (M+S tires vs. summer tires on the Passat), then the Camry SE (sport package for intenders) is cricized for being too stiff.
And of course, no mention that the Passat V6 is dramatically more expensive and less fuel efficient than the Camry.
Don't get me wrong, if I'm looking at a top of the line V6 sedan, a mpg or two deficit isn't going to be as important to me as some of the other things the Passat has going for it. Of these three comparisons, the Passat winning the V6 category makes the most sense to me. But after your selective memory on the first two tests where the Camry was superior you're going to get called out for your inconsistency
I agree with everyone on the west coast waking up 4 hours after New Jersey.$33K you get get a lot better rides than a veedub:
- Infiniti G Sedan
- Cadillac CTS Sport Sedan
- Lexus ES350
I know who's pocket MT is in now.......
Passat is only $6-8k more expensive.
A hell of a value for a family sedan!
BD
I've driven a rental sonata. Its kinda of rough when accelerating driving and braking. Interior is not as refined either. Now that the sonata have had some real world testing. The flaws are being reported from the consumers.
Gotta love the "VW isn't reliable" slander from all the Toyota fans. That VR6 is a killer engine, just as reliable as the other two in this test. I'm surprised the article didn't mention how glorious the exhaust note is.I'm shocked at how slow the 2.0T is. But then again, it's not the engine's fault. The Sonata is geared for optimal fuel economy (35mpg highway). Drop in some premium fuel and give it some better gear ratios and this would be a much quicker car. I'd love to see Hyundai/Kia give this engine a chance in a different car purpose-built for speed.
@benff:Mags often cannot get press cars equipped EXACTLY as they want. This is nothing new. They have to use the press cars provided. I dont think this comparo was based on features. Sonata is a nice car, but its competition has been refreshed. Everyone is in such awe of Hyundai that now people get mad if a Hyundai isnt seen as the benchmark in any given category. Sonata is now 3rd oldest midsizer on the market and after Malibu comes out it will be 4th oldest. Its hard to stay on top when your competition is so determined.
Short article for a 3 Car Comparison...Until VW fixes it's issues (and stops under styling), I won't be buying one.
Hyundai must be overrating their mpg and horsepower numbers lately. The real world data proves it. Even the old 2006 Sonata V6 with only 235 hp posted 0-60 in 6.8 seconds and weighed 200 pounds more.http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/112_0512_family_sedan_comparison/specs_prices.html
These last few VW articles have hindered Hyundai significantly (as well as Toyota). I am seeing much better numbers in every other site (usually averaging low 6s for the 2.0t). MT, I am loosing faith in you, this seems to blatant of a VW advertisement. Nothing wrong with the VW, but in the past three articles, it's a bit much.I call shenanigans!
Monday, 7 November 2011
Comparison: 2011 Hyundai Sonata Hybrid vs 2012 Toyota Camry Hybrid XLE vs. 2012 Volkswagen Passat TDI SE
I generally like MT articles and their knowledge but feel there must be a mistake here. I test drove a sonata hybrid (it was a manager's special car with 800 miles on the odo) and the car was a dealership car which had returned from a 100 mile trip. The trip computer on the dash (it was the base version) said 40.6 mpg average and the manager looked heavy-set and far from being a hypermiling kind of guy.
1. diesel stinkiness refers to your hands when you refuel it, the exhaust is pretty clean.
MT's testosterone is a quart low. And it's mascara is running.
That beats Haley's Comet
BD"
"In terms of power, interior space, useability, and fuel economy, the Camry's the best here." But the Passat is better because it felt better and won.
I forgot, you do everything someone tells you. You fall for every line
You definitely are the bend-over-and-take-it type......
The MotorTrend article seems to be only focused on interstate driving. I mean how many people only drive their cars on the interstate other than editors of MT that have nothing better to do?
"To the poster who said Hyundai interiors were plasticky". I found them personally to be on par or better than my Lexus and the gauges, materials were first rate, more often seen on 35K plus cars.
I would really want MT to retest a different Sonata hybrid because the numbers do not seem accurate from other road tests I have read (or) my personal experience at the dealership??
For example 123autocanada got 37mpg on a lead foot
http://www.auto123.com/en/news/car-news/past-topics/sonata-hybrid?topic=sonata+hybrid
@suparag9If all you (and MT) care about are the feelings of the drive then you (and MT) are not qualified to comment about these cars. Let's face it, all these cars ARE "appliances."
The Camry though, is the proven reliable appliance.
a couple of points:1. diesel stinkiness refers to your hands when you refuel it, the exhaust is pretty clean.
2. Toyota HSD hybrid tech is as reliable as possible for a car to get.. no belts, no clutches, no transmission, no starter, no alternator, no water pump, no turbo and no direct fuel injection.. and its very likely the brake pads will last 100k miles. The Hyundai tech is new and unproven.. VW TDI reliability and maintenance issues are scary after 5 years, these new diesels (2005-present) are very complicated and have expensive maintenance.. fuel quality is extremely critical with the common rail high pressure fuel pumps.
@Inyurahsya,VW won because it is a "Car" and for the driver, it is a pleasure to "drive" it.
Camry did not win because it is an "appliance" and for the driver, if he/she is awake, try to avoid the boredom with some tunes..
@lions208487, I guess you have never driven newer VW's and seems your opinions are based on cars more than two decades ago.I drive a 2006 VW Jetta TDI with 186K miles, I have not had any oil leaks, or oil sludge. As far as you put in oil that meets VW specs, you have no issues. At 50K miles the diesel engines are just breaking in.
I wanted to hear this many "feelings", I'd watch the next episode of "The View".MT's testosterone is a quart low. And it's mascara is running.
Tell me how it "feels" when the VW's check engine light comes on next week....
BD
As syj states, it's not all about 0-60 and MPG, but the Camry dominated in both so that deserve recognition. Since Fuel economy is the primary purpose for a hybrid, the Camry wins. Interior and exterior appearence is in the eye of the buyer, I personally would take the Camry over the VW. Despite Toyota's recall issues in the prior two years, they still make a much more reliable car than any VW product period. Intake valve, oil sludge, oil leaks tend to become a common problems with VW's after 50K miles. C/R and JDP consistantly list VW's issues with every years reliability test, and VW is always near the bottom. That alone is reason to go for the Hyundai or Toyota.
"churchThat beats Haley's Comet
BD"
Oh, I show up a little more often than that. But when I do, I'm right. Try again :P
Round 1: Base Model"In terms of power, interior space, useability, and fuel economy, the Camry's the best here." But the Passat is better because it felt better and won.
Round 2: Hybrids/Diesel(MPG)
The camry got 36.9 MPG; the Passat got 34.3 but is better because it felt better and won.
Let me guess...
Round 3: "High Octane" versions
The Camry and Sonata whooped the Passat but the Passat is better because it felt better and won.
Why even have these tests?
AdamlinkI forgot, you do everything someone tells you. You fall for every line
You definitely are the bend-over-and-take-it type......
You didn't read the article, just the final paragraph
But having someone read it for you kind of proves the point.....
BD
This comparison was not purely about gas mileage. If it was, the Focus SFE would have been included, because it gets 40 MPG on the highway. (Or the Fusion hybrid, etc.) It also wasn't meant to be a comparison of ALL the midsize contenders out there . . . because it just isn't practical to test 15 vehicles!
They took the current bestseller (the Camry), the hot newcomer (the Sonata), and a recently redesigned oldtimer, and tried to find out which was the best CAR . . . overall. Price, value, economy, handling, quality, etc.
MT praised each of these cars for their various attributes and criticized each one, as well. I think they were pretty fair. In the end it wasn't like one car was a total turd and the others were made of gold . . . each car did very well. Can you please everybody? Don't think so.
As a VW fan I'm just glad we were invited to the party this year. 
(You should try being a Redskins fan.)
BD,Please do not spill your pollution over to MotorTrend. Keep it to the hot heads and children on Autoblog and LeftLaneNews. We actually enjoy real conversation on this site.
To Black Dynamite and all the others on the Toyota payroll . . .You're absolutely right. The Camry actually won these two comparisons.
And the Redskins actually beat the Carolina Panthers this past Sunday. The scoreboard must have been wrong.
A couple of misconceptions. 1. VW does have hybrid technology. In the next few years you will see both hybrid gas vehicles and hybrid diesel vehicles here in the U.S.2. VW didn't go with diesel because it didn't have hybrid technology. They went with diesel because first, it was proven, second, it has fewer maintenance issues when compared to hybrid, third, it's familiar and widely available, and fourth, when synthetic diesel is developed to its full potential, diesel will cost far LESS than gasoline.
3. Where I live the price of diesel varies throughout the year. The most I've seen it is about 20 cents more than gas . . . but I've also seen it 10 cents LESS than gas, depending on the season and availability.
The TDI is not "smelly." You can stand right by the tailpipe while it's running and not smell a thing.You won't see any diesel residue left around the tailpipe on the bumper, either. In fact, you can run your finger around the inside of the tailpipe and you won't be able to pick up anything.
The TDi is actually cleaner than gasoline in certain particulates, and won the "Green Car of the Year" award when it first came out.
@ pmirp1If they were comparing hybrids, the TDI would not have been invited and the Camry would likely win. The Camry's acceleration times are faster than a number of yesteryear's V6s, which is quite impressive.
Then again, there is more to a car than 0-60 and mileage. To enthusiasts, things like interior comfort, handling, driving dynamics, and plastic texturing are more important than to the average driver. The Camry appeals to the average driver. VWs tend to appeal more to enthusiasts, although that is changing a bit. Based on early reviews, VW seems to have a particularly sweet spot with the Pasat, even if it does have an ugly grille.
There is also the point that hybrids are not the be all and end all to mileage, although it is hard to argue against their superiority in city and stop and go driving. However, a larger percentage of people drive on highways in most of the country as opposed to 90+% city driving (which is what I do). The Pasat seems to be the best overall car here.
@blackdynamiteNYCCamry - 2 wins
Passat and Sonata - 0.0
well said my friend. WELL SAID
i only add, Ron Kino doesn't know what he is talking about
Camry - 2 wins
Passat and Sonata - 0.0
BD
I haven't driven the new Toyota so i cant comment on that. I have driven the 2010 model. Its pretty smooth. Reminds me of a Lexus ES.
@himosesThe MotorTrend article seems to be only focused on interstate driving. I mean how many people only drive their cars on the interstate other than editors of MT that have nothing better to do?
To 99% of population, driving efficiency in the city is what matters.
Why does Motor Trend not state how much better the braking for the Camry has become? Remember the regenerative braking is a weak spot for all hybrids and now Camry has improved it.
Also, while most observers admit the dual clutch transmission for VW TDI has hesitation tendencies and there are many articles about it on the web, Motor Trend does not say a thing about all those issues.
Motor Trend clearly does not want to go where it should, which is lack of hybrid technology for VW. VW knows hybridization is expensive, so it leaves that technology for Porsche and expensive SUVs.
Camry gives that technology at its best to masses.
Power to the people, Camry wins outright.
I agree including a Fusion would have been more appropriate for t
As odious as I find it to agree with blackdynamite, he's correct here.Around town the VW may feel peppy, but out on the highway, the Camry thoroughly crushes it in acceleration - almost 2 seconds faster from 60-80 mph. That's a huge difference in passing power.
And in that aforementioned around town driving, I'll bet the Camry nearly doubles the Passat's fuel economy, never mind that in the US, 87 octane gas is some 10% cheaper than diesel these days.
And while I can believe that the Passat is more engaging to drive vs. the HSD CVT setup in the Camry and its disconnection between throttle and gas engine operation, if you're looking for a fuel sipper in this class, such engagement is not your top priority. And in the end, the Camry did beat the Passat around the figure-8 despite narrower, low rolling resistance tires so it isn't like it's slow in the cut and thrust of the real world.
And in the extra passenger room in the Camry, and world class reliability and I think the Camry has to win this class.
@ pmirp1Have you driven a TDI? They are hardly smelly. The comparison was for mileage so diesel belongs as an alternative to a hybrid. When it comes to city driving, diesels can't touch hybrids.
I would have liked to see the Fusion hybrid thrown in the mix since it has been the best midsize hybrid for the past two model years.
I guess that didn't have the Fusion Hybrid on hand because its not a "new" model like the trio at hand. Perhaps they are waiting for the New Malibu e-Assist/Fusion Hybrid match up next year.What a shame about the Sonata Hybrid. It shows that as fast as Hyundai has been cranking out models, something was bound to be a screw up. I'm not a Toyota fan by ANY means but I have to give them credit. The Camry is still a contender..even though its still ho hum!
Why compare a Diesel to hybrids? What logic is there for that? Other than the fact that Diesels get good gas mileage.A Diesel has very natural driving tendencies, and does not have to deal with dual technologies that are balanced in a hybrid. The Diesel does not have a CVT so of-course it feels better and sounds better to drive.
Still, the Camry is easily much faster, more fuel efficient by EPA standards (remember hybrid comes to light in city where most of us drive) and it is made by a company that has tremendous reliability.
Again this comparison just makes no sense, but by most objective criteria, the Camry wins. Case closed.
Now throw that smelly Diesel back in the sea or to Europe, where it needs to stay. America has no infrastructure for Diesel, as the last gas shortages showed. Do not be fooled
"A salesman at a dealer said they pulled of 700+ miles on one tank. Most of the mpg was achieved on cruise"A salesperson at a dealer said something highly optimistic about the cars they are selling? Alert the press!
The low real world MPG is an ongoing this for Hyundai. This isn't the first time one has underperformed when it comes to MPG. Sure MT has a heavy foot, but you can't think they were babying the Camry and Passat while just flogging the heck out of the Sonata to produce that result.
@InyurahsyaCome on man the camry beat it by what 2 mpg in the test. Really is that enough for me to run around with a car that a much lesser drive overall NO!!!!. The Camry did great in this test but its not soooo great that it would win. In a test done by CR it would have one because driving experience doesn't matter to consumer report, but this is motor trend.
Now I could understand if it lost to the hyundai in this test. Now that would be something to be upset about.
Shut up UpstateBD,VW won.
*** crap lost.
Again, the Camry lost due to driving dynamics when they are testing MPG. Why did they test the XLE against the TDI SE, WTF?It's funny how MT calls the Passat 43MPG on highway and yet refers to the Camry LE Hybrid as 41 combined as if to dumb tn down a little. Way to twist the truth, MT.
@ BlackDynamiteNYCGet over it. The Passat is better than the Camry.
VRsicks
@slu1979- Cleary you didn't read that they said it a much worse drive the passat all around. I mean come on you thought they'd prefer to drive a CVT over a 6 speed dct. LOLAnyways the only vehcile missingh was the fusion hybrid even though people are screaming conspiracy about the passat's performance. I can only wonder why the passat is winning in comparisons on other publications too? I guess VW much be paying off everyone.. LOL
Why did they use the Camry XLE, but not the same trim in the Passat (SEL)? The Camry LE actually gets ANOTHER 2 MPG better than the XLE!So IF MT wanted to do this on the square, they would test the right car, or add two MPG and subtract $1500 for the Camry.
So an LE Camry Hybrid would get approx. 38.9 MPG and cost $15 more than the Sonata, and cost $205 LESS than the Passat.
PLUS factor in the penalty for diesel gas.
PLUS this is obviously a highway test, and plays to the diesel's strength, and the diesel still got beat. If this was equal parts city and highway, it would have been even more of a blowout!
Again, MT strains to find problem with the Camry to negate it's clearly superior performance, and fails miserably......again.
MT screwed the pooch on back-to-back tests? WOW!
MT doesn't think much of their reader if they can't expect you to see through this TWICE!
MT, for shame........
BD
Luckily the hideous entry placed last, followed by the kind of hideous and very boring entry, right behind the most boring car in the world.
Wednesday, 2 November 2011
Long Term Update 2: 2011 Volkswagen Jetta TDI
MSRP: $15,365 - $24,995MPG Range: 31 - 42 mpgBody Style: Sedan, Wagon Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.
Tuesday, 1 November 2011
2012 Volkswagen Jetta
See What the
Rest of the Web Says We've gathered reviews from Edmunds.com, Cars.com plus live Tweets on this car. See What We Found »
Rest of the Web Says We've gathered reviews from Edmunds.com, Cars.com plus live Tweets on this car. See What We Found »
The 2012 Volkswagen Jetta hits showrooms for the new model year with a big victory notched into its serpentine belt. Critics said the move away from independent suspensions, high-dollar interiors and premium pricing would cost it customers--but VW's beat that bet, and the Jetta's selling better than it has in a decade.
It's no stroke of luck, though. Careful planning and marketing have given shoppers a Volkswagen choice in the cheap-compact class for the first time in a long time, and in a grim economy, that means more people considering the brand. Budget shoppers care less that the Jetta’s rear suspension is an older, cheaper design that’s not fully independent, or that the cabin wears harder plastic than it has in the past. They look past the sluggish base four-cylinder and see the Jetta's much roomier back seat, essentially a body custom-tailored for American buyers, and features like a Fender sound system and Bluetooth to meet their more basic needs.
This year, VW's taken some steps to cater more toward the other VW buyers, the ones more obsessed with handling and heritage. The new GLI model's an instant favorite, with its turbocharged four-cylinder engine, its soft-touch dash and its different, independent rear suspension. We're still enthusiastic about the TDI's 42-mpg fuel economy, especially in the SportWagen, which rides on the last-gen Jetta platform and still carries a torch for old-school VW interiors (and tight back seats)--and this year it gets a sunroof and navigation package, making it a great long-distance tourer.
In the grander scheme, the Jetta still shines in its class, in its traditional ways. Handling still is sharper than anything in this class, with near-perfect ride quality that still eludes the Asian competition. The Jetta--even in base form--steers and brakes with a more intimate feel. Only now, six-footers can fit behind tall drivers in the Jetta's back seat, even come out ahead on leg room. It's not progress on all fronts, but with its new take on value, the Jetta pitches itself squarely into a class of cars where its soft-pedaled style and its emphasis on core engineering actually make it stand out more.
Saturday, 29 October 2011
Comparison: 2012 Hyundai Sonata GLS vs. 2012 Toyota Camry LE vs. 2012 Volkswagen Passat SE
What I don't understand is how the Sonata, with the most HP and best power to weight ratio, is not faster than the Camry. As well as this, it got by far the worst mileage out of the three, when it should have been closer to the Camry's, if the EPA ratings were accurate. All of Hyundai's new cars seem this way too. They all look the best on paper, but don't work out to real world results. I would never buy a Camry, under any circumstances. It's just not a good car, in my opinion.
Jetta will sell 150k, which is not a failure, or a success. The top sellers double that. Jetta just looks like, and drives like, a failure. Ask anyone who drove the last one. Car & Driver couldn't rag on it more. Last in their 5 car comparison.
Why would I give a monkey's hairy sac about what happens in Europe?
Are you trying to set a record for biggest reach?
Hyundai? About 5 years
VW hasn't even started yet......."
2. Toyota Camry - Well rounded, reliable, built for the sheep of the driving world. Pass
3. Sonata - Hyudai's rising star looks the part but doesn't have the performance to back it up. Pass
Nice!
"Wake up, VW is on the rise. Not everyone buys cars based on CR rankings even if you chose to do so. VWs sales are way up and the PAssat will sell. "
I agree with you about the lack of colour imagination currently expressed by most manufacturers. One of the cars I recently looked at came in only six flavours: black, white, red, and what amounts to three shades of grey: silver, light grey, and dark grey. Kinda boring.
Having said that, nothing in this segment is a Ferrari or a Porsche. What people want in a midsize is, apparently, an appliance with a little-- just a little-- zing. I have to give kudos to Hyundai for trying to provide just that. I think that's why it's polling at #1. The Passat is also offering a little extra zing with its European style and German handling. That's why it's #2. The Camry is pure appliance. You don't stand in front of your refrigerator and admire it. You only want it to keep stuff cold.
I thought it was a good and well laid out article. The Pasat is a nice car. It looks sharp and the I5 gets dumped on a lot, but it isn't too bad. The 6-spd Shiftronic is an excellent transmission. The Pasat has the same power train in my Jetta, is bigger, and is lighter...a good combination. VW knows how to make their cars fun to drive.I was kind of surprised to see how much the Camry outperformed the Sonata when comparing automatic to automatic. If I were to buy a car in this comparison, it would be the Camry or the Sonata. I have driven the Sonata several times in multiple trim levels and the turbo, and it is an excellent car. However, its steering feel is bad, but not as bad as last generation's Camry (unless you are talking about the turbo which is even worse). Also, the seats, while initially comfortable, are too wide and flat to get comfortable for a nice long drive. Ingress and egress is slighly more difficult, but nothing noticeable.
BD, it's nothing in comparison to the pile of cash you've amassed being wrong. So far I haven't heard you say one thing that wasn't straight out of the Toyota playbook.What dealership do you work at?
"Ocellaris..stop living in the past, this is not the early 2000s. VW's quality numbers still lag behind those of Toyota and Hyundai."People confuse initial quality with long term quality. I would not argue that VW trails Hyundai in initial quality, however my concern is what happens to the Hyundais 5+ years down the road.
Very few people drive an "old" Hyundai because they didn't last. I live in the Northeast and less than a decade ago, the roads were positively bursting with people buying new Hyundais they got on the cheap. There are a few volume Hyundai dealers in the area and they didn't have trouble selling them. If you look around now, there are still a ton of early 2000s VW on the road and all of the Hyundais are gone and dead. If you do see one, bumpers are hanging off, the paint is fading and peeling, and the interior is trashed. People just presume these new Hyundais will last a long time because they look good, and people equate looks with quality.
BD, you're in denial. The Passat didn't lose this comparison. It won. Admit it.You're also in sales and you work for Toyota. I'll bet you money on it.
Jetta has lucked out, with the tsunami slowing down Corolla and Civic. Many companies have benefitted from an Act of God, handicapping the two leaders. Chevy Cruze as well is a big winner, but it got help.It's early! Calm down! After all the dust has settled, VW will be the bottom-feeders we all know and ignore.
(No matter how hard MT works to get them over.....and this was a work!)
Sonata is a full-size car in EPA, Camry and Passat are midsized. You need to study....
BD
you are such a shill that you dont even understand how success is measured. In the US Toyota is FAR bigger than VW. The fact that VW is now selling 13-15k Jettas a month is a huge win for VW considering their size in this market. Its about marketshare trends- Jetta's is way up and Corollas is down. VW doesnt have the production capacity on lineup size to compete with Toyota in total sales in the US. They dont even make trucks which automatically keeps them on a lower tier in terms of US sales. And BTW, the Jetta has been running at about 75% of the sales of the class leaders in 2011, not 50% of their sales. Remember, Corolla and civic have fallen off big time and Cruze has been averaging around 20k units a month for the last few months. Also, aside from the Fusion and Malibu we dont have confirmation that any new midsizers debut in 2012. Its speculation that a new accord might show up- has not been confirmed. How did the Passat lose in roominess? what review are YOU reading?
syjJetta will sell 150k, which is not a failure, or a success. The top sellers double that. Jetta just looks like, and drives like, a failure. Ask anyone who drove the last one. Car & Driver couldn't rag on it more. Last in their 5 car comparison.
Passat will be last starting next year, when the other cars are redesigned.
This car was beaten by BOTH the Camry and Sonata. Very shady decision by MT. It lost in price, power, efficiency, roominess, value, speed, etc. It won handling.
That's good enough for 3rd, not 1st place. Admit it.
BD
There wasnt even a 2011 passat- one reason "no one" cared about it. People will care about this one. Im sure if people went back and read your comments about the Jetta you probably repeated all the same trollish nonsense and predicted it would fail. Its been selling like hotcakes. And as others have noted, Toyota is a bit player in Europe and far behind VW and GM in china. Toyota does well in Japan and in the US. VW will outsell Toyota this year globally, they are not to be taken lightly.
@techie
MT doesnt rate cars by reliability- never have.
You never answered the question. Do you work for Toyota?Plenty of people care about the Passat here, and for good reason. It's a great car.
Like so many Toyota worshippers, you used sales numbers to try to justify the Camry's greatness. But, as usual, when presented with evidence of the Passat outselling the Camry, suddenly you don't care about sales figures.
AdamWhy would I give a monkey's hairy sac about what happens in Europe?
HERE, nobody cares about Passat, and with good reason......
BD
VW outsells Toyota in Europe by a huge margin. (The only company that comes close to VW sales in Europe is Ford.) The Golf sold almost 500,000 units in Europe-- more than double what Camry sold in the U.S. In Europe, the Passat is in the Top 10. The Camry isn't in the Top 50.
If numbers tell the story let's look at ALL the numbers, not just the ones that favor Toyota.
AdamAre you trying to set a record for biggest reach?
VW is not comparable to Toyota in quality. Hasn't been for DECADES. This ain't 1963.
This car will sell 1/3 of Camry next year. Why? Because people assume it is made like crap. It's earned that much respect......
BD
...
3. And VW's crap-tastic quality rep will be a blow from which it will never recover."
How do people keep bashing on VW quality while forgetting that just a few years ago, Hyundai was making JUNK cars for sale in the state. In northern states it is rare to see ANY Hyundai on the road more than 6 or 7 years old because they all rusted out and fell apart.
VW had a bad quality run with MKIV Jettas in the early 2000s (along with some other issues), however its been fairly solid since then. Meanwhile Hyundai was selling complete trash across their entire lineup in the early 2000s and now they get a free pass on reliability?!?
"Toyota has been building reliable cars for about 25 yearsHyundai? About 5 years
VW hasn't even started yet......."
VW has been building reliable cars for about 80 years. During a timespan that long you're bound to have a few ups and downs along the way.
Like Toyota. Did you know their quality got so bad at one point they actually left the U.S. market for an entire year?
Can't say that about VW.
"You do know that they tested a Camry with less responsive smaller wheels, right?"The Camry comes with smaller, less responsive wheels because that is the way Toyota chooses to equip it. Don't blame MT. Blame Toyota.
@chiguy:Exactly- and when will these folks realize that MT does NOT rank cars in reliability? This is obvious. the majority of the fanboys are saying "the Camry may not be a better car in this test, but the VW will break down so the camry should've won". What? MT isnt in the business of predicting reliability of new cars. IN fact, CR doesnt even rate cars based on reliability. They give them a road test score and then if the car scores high enough its recommended if the reliability is there. They do NOT base their scores on predicted reliability though.
The Passat wins again!The VW haters must be foaming at the mouth . . .
@ ChiGuy, Here you go."In terms of power, interior space, useability, and fuel economy, the Camry's the best here,"
You do know that they tested a Camry with less responsive smaller wheels, right?
As soon as I saw a Camry in this test, I knew the usual shills for Toyota would be chiming in. I am of course referring to Jimmy and Black Dynamite. Keep drinking the Kool-Aid and I hope you're comfy under the bridge.For them and the others wondering why their beloved Camry didn't win, read the quote from the article.
Let's just say the Camry returned some middling scores in a few key areas. First, we were unimpressed with its "architectural statement" styling, whose elements lacked cohesion and had an overall look too similar to that of its predecessor. Next, the soft suspension, while great for road trips, was not terribly assuring over the handling loop. "In the tighter sections of our drive, the Camry was not confidence-inspiring," declared Kong. Last, for $23,260 to start, the Toyota omitted such standard niceties as alloy wheels, which were included in our as-tested $22,405 Hyundai as well as a $23,460 Passat S with Appearance Package (our $25,595 SL came with larger 17-inch alloys)
BTW, what is the point of 5 cylinders, if it's less powerful, and less efficient, than 4-cylinders?Motor Trend didn't justify a Passat victory at all!
It lost in every way. Efficiency, power, speed, price, value, etc.....
BD
"Your ignorance is astounding. You should really stop posting.
1. VW's sales are up because they are following the Toyota/Honda philophy- worry about value and inoffensive styling instead of plush interiors and lux features."
You be happy to know i considered your suggestion and decided to continue to post. I can't stop posting & let your misrepresent facts & cloud smart people's judgment.
Accord and Camry lost market share this year because of the natural event and shortage of parts. They also have lost some market share because of improvements in Sonata and Optima. Has nothing to do with VW Passat which was just re-designed.
Luxury features of a VW? you got to be kidding. Feel the interior of Jeta. Checkout the engine of a VW. Camry brought a six speed automatic to market as soon as GM and Ford forced its hands and also Sonata and Optima. It has a great engine, as good a V4 as an Accord. To me those are still the best V4s. No they don't have DI but not needed
1. Passat - Questionable engineering and the styling of a bar of Dove soap. Pass2. Toyota Camry - Well rounded, reliable, built for the sheep of the driving world. Pass
3. Sonata - Hyudai's rising star looks the part but doesn't have the performance to back it up. Pass
Well it's nice to know that I can still avoid these cars and wont be missing anything. NEXT!
So many euro fanbois :\Regardless, the Sonata is the one winning. Just look outside at a street corner near you. Forget this review.
@pmirp:Your ignorance is astounding. You should really stop posting.
1. VW's sales are up because they are following the Toyota/Honda philophy- worry about value and inoffensive styling instead of plush interiors and lux features.
2. Even CR notes VWs reliability has improved
3. VWs recent models (Jetta and CC) have been successful so there is no reason to doubt the Passat
4. Camry and Accord have lost significant share over the last few years and even CR doesnt rate either sedan as best in class.
5. Toyota doesnt use state of art powertrains in anything not called Lexus. The Camrys engine is basically the same one its had for years. At least the Sonata has direct injection.
Nice!
I guess that's why it's The People's Champion!
BD
MT, if you're going to do a comparison test, please bring comparable vehicle.
Old people buy the Camry.The younger, hip generation buys the Passat. Many people are willing to compromise a few mpg in order to have a more comfortable, better feeling car.
MotorTrend, how about doing a hard-core reliability test? Take a few different cars/engines and put them through some extreme (Top Gear-esque) testing to find out just how reliable/durable these cars are. I'd love to see VW's 2.5L and 2.0T dispell the myth that VW's aren't reliable.
Syj says:"Wake up, VW is on the rise. Not everyone buys cars based on CR rankings even if you chose to do so. VWs sales are way up and the PAssat will sell. "
Syj, on what planet do you live on? People who buy mid-size cars review CR because reliability matters. They don't want cars in the shop constantly. Until VW improves that, they stand no chance.
Their sales increased, because of price reductions to make their cars more competitive with Camry and Koreans. In process they have moved away from attributes that they have pushed for years (performance of their 2.0 turbo and quality materials). Now they got nothing left.
I admit Passat is a competitive product from quality of interior and design, but not so much from a engine perspective. Until they invest in modern engine technology like Camry and Koreans, they stand zero chance. And until they improve quality year over year, they will come in last.
Now go study some more about virtues that sell mid-size family cars in US before posting
FullMonte:I agree with you about the lack of colour imagination currently expressed by most manufacturers. One of the cars I recently looked at came in only six flavours: black, white, red, and what amounts to three shades of grey: silver, light grey, and dark grey. Kinda boring.
Maybe if Fiat is successful in the U.S., we'll start seeing a more diverse colour pallete. While I have no interest in buying a Fiat 500, it does come in over a dozen colours, including cappucino and some of the others you mentioned.
Sonata is legitimate competition to Camry. Passat not so much.......1. The average buyer won't weight the test drive heavily on handling.
2. The Passats 22/31, with less 8 fewer HP than Camry will hurt the sales pitch.
3. And VW's crap-tastic quality rep will be a blow from which it will never recover.
It's pretty obvious that Camry was the better car, but MT wanted something else to win. Using the "If you squint, you can see an A8" is pretty desperate. Good luck with that!
Speed, economy, reputation, roomy, lightweight
Toyota Camry still reigns as The People's Champion.
BD
It isn't the Germans fault they make superior vehicles, the others need to step their games up. Of these 3, the VW is the only one I'd even consider getting, just because it's German made which equals engineering superiority and it looks great (relatively).
@supervette:Sonata has consistently been in the 8 sec range in 0-60. It doesnt perform as well as expected considering its power to weight ratio. Fastest time I've seen is 7.8s. Its barely faster than the Verano which weighs more and packs only 180hp.
@pmirp:Wake up, VW is on the rise. Not everyone buys cars based on CR rankings even if you chose to do so. VWs sales are way up and the PAssat will sell. Lots of people like VWs styling, interiors and diesel engines. We arent in the 90s anymore, the days of people thinking that you have to buy a camry or Accord to get a sedan that will last more than 50k miles are over. The myth has been shattered and the Passat will only help VW post even larger sales gains in 2012.
The real world mileage of the sonata in this test isnt impressive at all. Hyundais continue to underachieve in real world mileage testing. On paper, the sonata is considerably more efficient than the Passat.
In real world a VW is not even on the same planet as Sonata or Camry.When it comes to reliability, the marketplace does not recognize VW as a leader. Reputation counts for a lot and that is where Camry has VW and Sonata beat.
VW with yesteryear engine technology, only has Camry beat by virtue of better wheels and tires. This is a very superficial comparison.
Until the day VW proves its reliability figures year in and year out, as you state, Camry is number 1 in sales for a reason.
Also when it comes to overall numbers this year for Camry and other Japanese cars, one has to remember the limitations on capacity as result of natural disaster. All to say, we don't know what happens next year, except, VW has zero chance of being in top 3 among mid-size cars.
Kind of an embarrassing conclusion to your story, don't you say? Shades of Motor Trends past when you picked Honda Insight over Toyota Prius
Sunday, 23 October 2011
First Test: 2012 Volkswagen Passat
Just a few weeks ago, Volkswagen of America's state-of-the-art plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee, cranked out its 10,000th Passat -- a Candy White TDI wearing a premium chrome package. Not bad for a facility that opened just five months earlier. Volkswagen is charging ahead with its goal of building 100,000 vehicles a year at Chattanooga starting next year, and the all-new 2012 Volkswagen Passat is key to hitting that target. In September alone, more than 3000 customers took home one of VW's Chattanoogian chariots. Part of the 2012 Passat's success no doubt has to do with the variety of models and trims available for the big VW sedan. There are three engine choices -- a 170-horse 2.5-liter inline-five, 280-horse 3.6-liter V-6, and a 140-horse 2.0-liter turbo four-banger -- available in a total of 14 trims. We recently had a chance to sample three combinations: a 2.5L S, 3.6 SEL, and TDI SE.No matter the trim or mill, the Passat's sheetmetal stays basically the same. Its lines are simple, clean, and inoffensive, yet modern. A few staffers labeled it boring, but then noted the Passat and its competition in the family-friendly sedan segment aren't exactly known for avant-garde styling. Overall, we consider the styling a step in the right direction, especially with the LED touches and available 17-inch alloys.The standard equipment list gives buyers plenty to work with: a six-speed manual (or automatic transmission), auto dual-climate control, power locks and windows, color-matched mirrors and door handles, Bluetooth, and electronically adjustable driver seat are all included. Sadly, an iPod interface isn't. You'll have to upgrade to the 2.5L SE manual to get 17-inch wheels, heated leatherette front seats, and a touch-screen Premium VIII radio. Continue up the SE and SEL trim chain in either V-6 or TDI models to get more goodies like a navigation system with Mobile Device Interface, Fender sound system, wood grain, and chrome accents or aluminum accents.Average consumers are likely to lug friends, kids, or coworkers in this model, not carve unused back roads like my colleagues and I do. The 2.5 SE offers enough power to get from Point A to B, and that's probably good enough. Its pipes may not omit an attractive note, but at the end of the day, it returns a competitive 22/31 city/highway EPA fuel economy rating .As you can imagine, with 110 more horses and 81 more lb-ft than the base mill, the VR6-packing Passat is a lot more entertaining. That extra power helps out if you're more of a passer than a cruiser. Its sharp turn-in impresses, as does the palatable chassis communication. Its brakes bite harder as well. Relatively speaking, the Passat V6 is the rocket of the lineup: Going from nothing to 60 mph is a 5.7-second affair; it tackles a quarter-mile in 14.2 seconds at 100.9 mph and needs 119 feet to stop from 60 mph.Despite it not being an enthralling choice for impassioned enthusiasts, the TDI is arguably the best pick for the sedan buyer looking for decent sportiness, great comfort, massive space, and awesome fuel economy and range. The last trait rocked our proverbial socks: We went at least 450 miles between fill-ups. And we weren't friendly with the go-pedal, either.Three Passats aimed at three different buyers. Together they comprise one solid lineup that is already throwing some hard blows in one of America's hugely important midsize sedan market. Do Toyota, Hyundai, Honda, Subaru, and the rest of the lot have something to worry about? Yes, they do. And if Volkswagen's optimistic sales plans come to fruition, you'll soon be seeing a lot more Tennessee-built Passats strolling through your neck of the woods.Front engine, FWD, 5-pass, 4-door sedan Front engine, FWD, 5-pass, 4-door sedan Front engine, FWD, 5-pass, 4-door sedan 2.5L/170-hp/177-lb-ft DOHC 20-valve I-5 3.6L/280-hp/258-lb-ft DOHC 24-valve V-6 2.0L/140-hp/236-lb-ft turbodiesel DOHC 16-valve I-4 Sunday, 16 October 2011
2012 Volkswagen Beetle
See What the
Rest of the Web Says We've gathered reviews from Edmunds.com, Cars.com plus live Tweets on this car. See What We Found »
Rest of the Web Says We've gathered reviews from Edmunds.com, Cars.com plus live Tweets on this car. See What We Found »
The 2012 Volkswagen Beetle would like us all to forget some things--that it ever had "new" in its name, that it ever had a bud vase on its dash, that it ever occupied more parking spots at more sororities at more of our nation's colleges than actual pledges did. That's, like, totally possible, right?
This time around, the Beetle wants to be your bad bromance, and it gets things rolling with sheetmetal that's been butched up and pulled taut. If the flat-top roof, the unsubtle Turbo stickers and the red-painted calipers didn't clue you in, we'll just point to the place on the dash where the flower pot used to live.
Now, the base Beetle doesn't live up to that hype, but it's fine for the kind of commuting chores that won't tax the generic acceleration of its five-cylinder engine and the bobbly handling generated by its torsion-beam suspension. Fine, as long as the middling gas mileage doesn't steer you into a MINI Cooper or a Mustang instead.
Check off the Turbo boxes, and now, we're talking. This is the punchy Bug, with VW's omnipresent, heavy-breathing four-cylinder flipping out 0-60 mph runs under 7.5 seconds while it doles out some not-unpleasant whining and growling. VW's dual-clutch transmission passes the winding-road test with flying colors, even if it bogs a little from a dead stop. A touch of body roll here, a quick crank of electric steering there, and the composed Beetle Turbo feels like it has much more potential than its B+ average indicates.
The Bug's even a little more practical now. VW says it has more room than before, and it's felt in the front two seats, though the extra space seems to spread out all to one side: the console's still close, the door panels farther away. The back seats can be endured by adults, but skimpy leg room means this is still a classic 2+2, no EPA-standards sedan like the BMW 3-Series two-door. Trunk space gets better on paper--so why could we only stuff it with two roll-aboards?
At its most clever, the Beetle recognizes how the digital world has changed cars, at least in entertainment features. Safety gear lags a bit, with no rearview camera linked up with the available navigation, but every Beetle can have a USB port, Bluetooth audio streaming and a classy Fender-penned sound system with some epic midrange talents.
The Beetle name has sold more than 20 million vehicles, over more than half a century. But for the past decade, it's been tougher and tougher to get overwhelmed by history alone, tougher to give the old New Beetle a pass for lackluster performance and aging kitsch. Now the likeable Beetle's become way more interesting to drive--and we're more than ready to take on diesel and R versions, cars that probably will outpace the newest Beetle Turbo as the best Bugs yet.
Tuesday, 11 October 2011
2012 Volkswagen Jetta
See What the
Rest of the Web Says We've gathered reviews from Edmunds.com, Cars.com plus live Tweets on this car. See What We Found »
Rest of the Web Says We've gathered reviews from Edmunds.com, Cars.com plus live Tweets on this car. See What We Found »
The 2012 Volkswagen Jetta hits showrooms for the new model year with a big victory notched into its serpentine belt. Critics said the move away from independent suspensions, high-dollar interiors and premium pricing would cost it customers--but VW's beat that bet, and the Jetta's selling better than it has in a decade.
It's no stroke of luck, though. Careful planning and marketing have given shoppers a Volkswagen choice in the cheap-compact class for the first time in a long time, and in a grim economy, that means more people considering the brand. Budget shoppers care less that the Jetta’s rear suspension is an older, cheaper design that’s not fully independent, or that the cabin wears harder plastic than it has in the past. They look past the sluggish base four-cylinder and see the Jetta's much roomier back seat, essentially a body custom-tailored for American buyers, and features like a Fender sound system and Bluetooth to meet their more basic needs.
This year, VW's taken some steps to cater more toward the other VW buyers, the ones more obsessed with handling and heritage. The new GLI model's an instant favorite, with its turbocharged four-cylinder engine, its soft-touch dash and its different, independent rear suspension. We're still enthusiastic about the TDI's 42-mpg fuel economy, especially in the SportWagen, which rides on the last-gen Jetta platform and still carries a torch for old-school VW interiors (and tight back seats)--and this year it gets a sunroof and navigation package, making it a great long-distance tourer.
In the grander scheme, the Jetta still shines in its class, in its traditional ways. Handling still is sharper than anything in this class, with near-perfect ride quality that still eludes the Asian competition. The Jetta--even in base form--steers and brakes with a more intimate feel. Only now, six-footers can fit behind tall drivers in the Jetta's back seat, even come out ahead on leg room. It's not progress on all fronts, but with its new take on value, the Jetta pitches itself squarely into a class of cars where its soft-pedaled style and its emphasis on core engineering actually make it stand out more.
Sunday, 24 July 2011
First Drive: 2012 Volkswagen Tiguan
Mid-Cycle Tweaks Take VW's Small SUV To All-Star Status
Chuck Taylors are far from the best choice for hiking shoes. Especially a worn-out pair with more miles on them than many cars built in the previous decade. This thought is stuck to the top of my skull like a passenger inside an elevator in freefall as I am quickly transferred from a state of vertical to horizontal. I'm in the Austrian woods to drive the revamped 2012 Volkswagen Tiguan, but more important, I'm accelerating towards wet, spongy ground that is too much for me and my Chucks. I shouldn't have gotten out of the SUV, because it doesn't seem to be having any problems. 
The Wild Cherry Red Tiguan looks like a waxed metallic forest fire set amongst the mossy trees in what will be an off-limits section of a ski resort in another few months. For our press drive, the VW guys gave us a route that included several miles of dirt and gravel roads, but my co-driver and I decided we needed photography in a real off-road setting. A long, overgrown access road presented itself along the route and we couldn't pass it up. The ground here is a combination of peat and bugs. It feels like ground-up Super Balls, and has no visual indication of just how solid it is. I find out firsthand while trying to get back down a 25-foot hill overlooking the parked Tiguan with my right hand filled with five pounds of dirt-hating camera. With every step my foot sinks three inches into the luxurious alpine sludge before coming to a semi-solid stop. This time, however, as I lift my left foot the ground gives way under my right. I slide heel first, and serene alpine cliffs and valleys normally echoing with yodels and cowbells are now filled with the sound of snapping twigs and a single prolonged and profane exclamation in English.
Motor Trend Rating:
Chuck Taylors are far from the best choice for hiking shoes. Especially a worn-out pair with more miles on them than many cars built in the previous decade. This thought is stuck to the top of my skull like a passenger inside an elevator in freefall as I am quickly transferred from a state of vertical to horizontal. I'm in the Austrian woods to drive the revamped 2012 Volkswagen Tiguan, but more important, I'm accelerating towards wet, spongy ground that is too much for me and my Chucks. I shouldn't have gotten out of the SUV, because it doesn't seem to be having any problems. The Wild Cherry Red Tiguan looks like a waxed metallic forest fire set amongst the mossy trees in what will be an off-limits section of a ski resort in another few months. For our press drive, the VW guys gave us a route that included several miles of dirt and gravel roads, but my co-driver and I decided we needed photography in a real off-road setting. A long, overgrown access road presented itself along the route and we couldn't pass it up. The ground here is a combination of peat and bugs. It feels like ground-up Super Balls, and has no visual indication of just how solid it is. I find out firsthand while trying to get back down a 25-foot hill overlooking the parked Tiguan with my right hand filled with five pounds of dirt-hating camera. With every step my foot sinks three inches into the luxurious alpine sludge before coming to a semi-solid stop. This time, however, as I lift my left foot the ground gives way under my right. I slide heel first, and serene alpine cliffs and valleys normally echoing with yodels and cowbells are now filled with the sound of snapping twigs and a single prolonged and profane exclamation in English.Motor Trend Rating:
Saturday, 23 July 2011
First Drive: 2012 Volkswagen Passat [Review]
It’s now built in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and maybe even speaks with a decidedly Southern drawl (Achtung, Y’all!) But with the 2012 Volkswagen Passat, the people’s carmaker is making its second attempt in gaining a U.S. manufacturing presence.
According to VW officials, the new Passat is designed, engineered and tested in Germany for North American tastes. (The Passat will also be sold in Canada and Mexico.) VW has been here before and success was less than palpable, but the automaker hopes that a couple of decades of experience will turn the tables in this, one of the most competitive segments in the industry.
So hop in, turn on the Fender-branded audio system and let’s hit the road as Leftlane checks out the 2012 Volkswagen Passat.
On the map
Chattanooga is not totally foreign to foreign cars, or domestics for that matter. An automotive landmark that goes by the name of “Honest Charley’s Speed Shop,” is here, offering everything for the hot rod aficionado in search of a needed part or to channel the ghost of “Honest Charley, Hisself.”
Next door is tire manufacturer Coker Tire Company, which is known worldwide for its continuation series of obsolete and out-of-manufacture tires for classic and collector cars. With character Corky Coker at the helm of both businesses, the city of Chattanooga has long been a part of the automotive landscape.
The Passat, meanwhile, is a new look for a venerable nameplate. A five-passenger sedan, it will be available in three trim configurations and three engine choices. Look for a base 2.5-liter five cylinder, a 2.0-liter turbodiesel TDI and a 3.6-liter VR6 naturally-aspirated V6 engine.
The Passat is up against some pretty stout – and conservative- competition in this, the most competitive segment of the market: Midsize family sedans.
New and improved
It’s a cliché for certain, but one that V-Dub hopes to drive home to prospective buyers when the car goes on sale mid-summer. Of note right up front: The 2008 Passat offered 128 build combinations. The 2012 model offers 15. By combining options into various trim packages and option groupings, VW has managed to become more efficient in the build- and buying process at the same time.
If you liked the old Passat (and, judging by sales figures, you’re pretty much alone), VW is selling an updated version in Europe, where this ‘Mericanized Passat won’t be on offer.
The hope is that all markets will be taken care of by offering something for potentially every type of buyer. Just a hint of that something includes three choices of engine and four transmissions: A five-speed stick or six-speed Tiptronic automatic for the 2.5-liter, a six-speed stick or DSG automatic (a dual clutch unit with ultrafast shifts) for the TDI and only the DSG for the VR6. Enough acronyms? Let’s make it simple: The TDI and VR6 both offer the more advanced transmissions.
On the safety side of things, this new Passat manages a new intelligent safety function, which unlocks doors, and turns on the four-way flashers, presumably after the ABS and active head restraints have helped you survive a crash.
Brooks Brothers meets Southeastern Tennessee
The overall appearance of the 2012 Passat verges on excessively conservative. But the question is, “will it play in Peoria?” We think it will, something the sleeker outgoing model never did. The Passat was designed in Wolfsburg, Germany, with U.S. sensitivities such as size, interior space and other considerations all in place. We also think they paid attention to the size of their prospective customers/occupants.
A very upright-styled grille starts things off with horizontal chrome bands and the large VW crest. Featuring horizontal designs, the new Passat displays a visual strength in profile that starts from the multi-terraced hood and drops down through many layers. In fact, we count nine different layers of horizontal lineage from the roof to the rocker panels.
Conservative for sure, but it should definitely have more legs (longer life) as a result. In many ways, it’s the complete opposite of what we’re seeing from South Korea’s Hyundai and Kia. It’ll be interesting to see how it all plays out in the long run, that’s for sure.
A traditional pod dashboard starts things off inside with an available faux wood trimming. Inspired by the dashboard found in the VW Touareg, the Passat’s dash features a two-gauge binnacle that offers the driver a tachometer and speedometer with LCD screen in between that displays navigation, audio and vehicle information. A multi-function display operates available Premium VIII navigation, audio, and Bluetooth functions.
Overall, the Passat is loaded with upscale cues throughout. We liked the feel and thickness of the leather-wrapped steering wheel and the use of soft-touch material in all the right places, something we can’t say about the Passat’s little Jetta brother. But not all was perfect. An analog clock sits at the top of the center stack. A little cheesy at the moment, it would look much better with the addition of some chromed hands instead of the plastic pieces in place right now.
Seats were comfortable for the four-hour drive that took us from Chattanooga through Lynchburg (say hello to Jack Daniels). We do think the adjustable front seats would be that much better with a seat-bottom height adjustment instead of the limited movements they currently offer. We arrived at our destination of Tootsie’s Orchid Lounge in Nashville, Tennessee, where live music is always on tap. Conversely, the Fender Audio System, which our tester was outfitted with, gave us a live concert hall experience inside our own private rolling listening room.
The surprising take-away from the Passat was the cavernous rear seating area. We were totally chuffed by how much legroom was really there.
Motivation
The base, and most popular engine, VW reckons, will be the 2.5-liter inline, five-cylinder engine with multiport fuel injection. It produces 170 ponies at 5,700 rpm, and 177 lb–ft. of torque at 4,250 rpm. This is the one engine that we think might be left wanting in a car this size, although the 21/32 mpg EPA ratings aren’t a great tradeoff compared to some more powerful and less thirsty rivals.
Next in line is the 2.0-liter, four-cylinder, turbocharged direct-injection TDI diesel. It cranks out 140 ponies at 4,000 rpm and a stump-pulling 236 lb-ft. of torque. VW mileage estimates have the TDI achieving 43 mpg highway (31 in town), with a range of nearly 800 miles per fill-up.
The final engine is a 3.6-liter VR6 V-6 fuel-stratified injection (FSI) engine that makes a segment leading 280 horsepower and 258 lb-ft. of torque. A great and powerful performer, our only wish is that it did not require premium fuel for optimum performance. Speaking of fuel, Volkswagen estimates 20/28 mpg for the 3,446 lbs. VR6.
The Passat is a unibody construction with a pair of struts with lower control arms, coil-overs and anti-roll bars. The rear is a multi-link kit with telescopic shock absorbers, an anti-roll bar and an acoustically decoupled rear axle. A hydraulically-controlled rack and pinion steering system is speed sensitive and builds up resistance, as speed increases as well as when the vehicle is shifted into sport mode.
VW officials were very quick to point out how the Passat suspension has been tuned for US roadways, while keeping the characteristic fun-to-drive German sensibilities in place. For the most part we would agree. But we did notice a couple bugs: Steering in the range of 50 mph seemed a bit sloppy. When shifting into sport mode it offered a marked improvement.
Further up the road, we observed the DSG holding gears longer than we found appropriate, at one point even past redline, at which point we took matters into our own hands with the use of the steering wheel mounted paddle shifters. We pulled the car over at a driver’s change point and shut it down. After restart, the problem never appeared again, so we will chalk it up to electronic gremlins at work.
Seeing that the Passat is not scheduled for sale until September, they have ample time to address the issues – something VW is no doubt trying its best to do in order not to repeat its last U.S. manufacturing experience.
Leftlane’s bottom line
Bugs aside, we think V-Dub really has a contender with the 2012 Passat. Improved at most every turn, it is not the sexiest design out there, but that could help its longevity in the marketplace.
Add to that, the fact that VW Group is cognizant of climbing fuel costs and rightly aware of the diesel engine’s place in the segment. Combine all of that with a priced-right starting point of $19,995, and no-charge three-year/36,000 mile Carefree Maintenance program and it’s clear that VW is going for “Great for the price of good, v2.0.”
2012 Volkswagen Passat base price range, $19,995 to $28,995.
Words and photos by Mark Elias.
Wednesday, 20 July 2011
IIHS commends Saab 9-5, Volkswagen CC with Top Safety Pick award
New Cars Home
Learn more about new cars with our extensive collection of overviews, specifications, and pictures.
Tuesday, 19 July 2011
2011 Volkswagen Touareg
The Volkswagen Touareg might be named after a nomadic people inhabiting North Africa, but for 2011 it trades in some of its rugged, off-road image this year for a focus on suburban families; VW has redesigned the Touareg, making it lighter and better-detailed inside, while a new Touareg Hybrid model joins the clean-diesel Touareg TDI as higher-mileage alternatives to a base gasoline V-6. The 2011 Volkswagen Touareg has dropped some of its ruggedness in favor of the comfort suburban families want?but it's still not quite a rival to luxury-brand utes.
Thanks to a strict weight-loss regiment, the 2011 Volkswagen Touareg is now a much more nimble performer on the road while still trail-capable. See details and best of the Web Interior design, space, and comfort really matter to premium crossover shoppers, and Volkswagen has shown new attention to that in the 2011 Touareg. See details and best of the Web The 2011 Volkswagen Touareg has lost a lot of weight this year, but that hasn't affected this SUV's excellent safety ratings. See details and best of the Web Base VR6 versions of the 2011 Volkswagen Touareg are still thirstier than most in its class, but in TDI or Hybrid form it's a lot greener. See details and best of the Web Strong, high-mpg TDIMore nimble, responsive feelNicely upgraded interiorRide qualityGet Dealer Price Quotes Luxury price for a mainstream brandRelatively few high-tech optionsHard to make an argument for the Hybrid
The 2011 Touareg is 450 pounds lighter and 20 percent more fuel-efficient than the model it replaces, according to Volkswagen, and a new Touareg Hybrid model allows it to hit an EPA-rated 20 mpg in the city.
The Touareg has been fully redesigned, with the new look adding more carlike details and toning down the ruggedness a bit. On the outside, a new grille and front end design are much more like that used in Volkswagen's car lineup. Overall, the Touareg is slightly wider, though not as tall, as the previous model, but a longer wheelbase and more overall length result in more interior space; given those changes, overall the Touareg keeps a silhouette that's much like that of the outgoing model. Inside, the Touareg keeps more of the same with respect to layout—a high seating position, with an upright orientation to the instrument panel and a high, wide center console—but trims and materials have been upgraded.
With three powertrains on offer in the 2011 Touareg, you have a choice between standard gasoline or two different shades of green, both at a slight premium. A conventional gasoline V-6—actually a 3.6-liter, 280-horsepower version of VW's VR6—is the base engine, then there's also a clean-diesel 3.0-liter V-6 TDI that makes 225 horsepower, or a new Hybrid, which combines a supercharged 3.0-liter V-6 with an electric traction motor for total power of 380 horsepower.
All three Touareg models use a new eight-speed automatic transmission, and all-wheel drive is standard. In the hybrid model, the electric motor is sandwiched between the engine and the transmission, with clutches on either end so that the electric motor can power the vehicle by itself under light load, at speeds up to 30 miles per hour. The Touareg Hybrid model incorporates a start-stop system and regenerative braking; and the hybrid system allows the transmission to smartly—and completely—disengage from the engine, to allow coasting long distances at higher speed.
The 2011 Touareg is about the same size as the outgoing version, yet Volkswagen has worked some magic with seating and made the interior a much better place. That's good, as the former version's interior was surprisingly tight for such a large vehicle. The new rear bench that can travel more than six inches fore and aft. In all, you can very comfortably fit four for a long trip, or five adults for a night out if backseat occupants don't mind contact. Cargo space is quite good, too; what's more, a power-folding arrangement can easily reposition to a fully flat cargo floor.
Those upscale prices demand an upscale cabin, and the Touareg has that. Materials have been fully revamped, and while the Touareg might be in synch with other VW models with respect to design, it's appointed with nicely finished materials that share more in common with Audi.
All models but the base Sport also get leather upholstery, a panoramic sunroof, and memory seats. Executive and Hybrid models add premium audio, rear-obstacle detection, a heated steering wheel, keyless entry and starting, and heated rear seats. Exclusive to the Hybrid model is a power tilt/telescope steering wheel.
What the Touareg is missing, feature-wise, are the sophisticated high-tech conveniences of the luxury-brand models from BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Lexus that it's priced against—items like adaptive cruise control and more sophisticated infotainment features. Considering that, a fully loaded Touareg feels pricey, as well as a little pointless given the competitive set.
Thanks to a strict weight-loss regiment, the 2011 Volkswagen Touareg is now a much more nimble performer on the road while still trail-capable. See details and best of the Web Interior design, space, and comfort really matter to premium crossover shoppers, and Volkswagen has shown new attention to that in the 2011 Touareg. See details and best of the Web The 2011 Volkswagen Touareg has lost a lot of weight this year, but that hasn't affected this SUV's excellent safety ratings. See details and best of the Web Base VR6 versions of the 2011 Volkswagen Touareg are still thirstier than most in its class, but in TDI or Hybrid form it's a lot greener. See details and best of the Web Strong, high-mpg TDIMore nimble, responsive feelNicely upgraded interiorRide qualityGet Dealer Price Quotes Luxury price for a mainstream brandRelatively few high-tech optionsHard to make an argument for the Hybrid
Monday, 4 July 2011
Volkswagen slashes $7,000 from base price of latest Passat
Earlier this year Leftlane brought you the first official and live images of the all-new, heavily redesigned U.S. market Passat straight from the show floor of the Detroit Auto show.
The only thing missing at the time in Volkswagen’s press materials was pricing for its Camry/Accord/Fusion/Sonata/Malibu-fighting Passat. Today, we have that pricing, including the staggeringly lower than last year’s base price of $19,995 plus $770 destination (or $20,765 for all intents and purposes).
So how did VW do it? For starters the new model is packaged quite differently, following the same plan as the newer, cheaper and less sophisticated Jetta (compared to the previous generation). As a result, VW is able to grab buyer’s attention with markedly lower starting prices, along with wider price ranges across the model lineup.
The base Passat will for example take a step or two backwards from the standard 2.0-liter turbocharged engine and direct-shift gearbox (DSG) that came as standard equipment for the previous model year, instead starting with a naturally aspirated 2.5-liter five-cylinder that churns out just 170 horsepower and 177 lb-ft of torque, matched to a five-speed manual transmission.
While a directly comparable 2012 model cannot be specced out due to the total removal of the 2.0T engine, the next-closest option would come from the mid-level 2.5-liter TDI good for 140 horsepower and 236 lb-ft of torque, which starts at $28,665 – slightly more than a comparable 2010 model.
Models range from a 2.5 S base model with a manual transmission and a $20,765 sticker price (add $2,695 for an automatic), to $30,665 for the SEL Premium automatic which still has the 2.5-liter five-cylinder engine. Stepping up to the TDI will put the base price at $26,765 for a manual, rising to $32,965 for the SEL Premium TDI. The Passat range is topped by a 3.6-liter V6, also known as the VR6, which boasts 280 horsepower and 258 lb-ft of torque, starting at $29,765, and topping out at $33,720 before individual options.
All told, Passat is available in 15 different preset package/engine combinations. VW says that the main reason it was able to bring the price down was not the change to packaging or features, but rather the switch to local production at VW’s new assembly plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee.
Coverage from the Detroit Auto Show
Compared to the outgoing model, the new Passat is considerably different and larger and it shares little more than a name with its European counterpart. The changes also continue underhood, and in total, VW believes it has found the right formula for a successful midsize sedan in the American market.
Styling
Looking much like a larger, wider Jetta, the Passat was penned by VW designer Walter de Silva. It measures in at 191.7 inches long and rides on a 110.4 inch wheelbase.
Uplevel models feature chrome accents throughout.
It’s what is under the hood that counts
Part of the formula that VW is banking on to move some metal comes from a new engine lineup that eschews the traditional use of a four-cylinder engine as the base models for a 2.5-liter five-cylinder engine, followed by a 2.0-liter TDI clean diesel and topped off with a sporty 3.6-liter VR6 engine.
The base 2.5-liter will be good for 170 horsepower and 177 lb-ft of torque, and comes standard with a five-speed manual transmission. For those who prefer not to row their own gears, VW also has an optional six-speed automatic available.
For those willing to drop a little more coin for a lot more fuel economy, the 2.0-liter TDI is certainly the engine of choice in the Passat. The only diesel in its segment, the Passat TDI is expected to net 43 mpg on the highway, according to VW. Combined with a fuel tank just short of 20 gallons, VW says it should have no problem driving 800 miles on a single tank of fuel. Rated at 140 horsepower and 236 lb-ft. of torque, the four-cylinder diesel engine is seemingly ubiquitous in VW’s lineup. A six-speed stick will be standard, while a six-speed DSG dual clutch automatic will be optional.
Most Passats will probably be delivered with four or five-cylinder engines, but VW will also offer a 3.6-liter VR6 rated at 280 horsepower and 258 lb-ft. of torque. VW estimates fuel economy at 28 mpg on the highway. The VR6 will be exclusively mated to VW’s DSG automatic transmission.
Equipment content
Although it might look and feel like a larger Jetta, VW promises that the Passat is a premium offering. Its wide doors reveal an especially spacious interior, including a huge rear seat area.
Three trim levels will be on offer – S, SE and SEL. Look for more details to arrive closer to launch, but volume SE models will be swathed in VW’s leather-like vinyl and come with switchgear used in the Jetta. Soft touch and hard plastic surfaces abound, although SELs come with richer-looking leather, synthetic suede and real wood trim.
Standard 17-inch wheels can be upgraded to 18s and the Passat will be among the first VWs to offer the automaker’s new Fender-developed audio system.
Look for the 2012 Passat to begin arriving in dealers this fall.
Wednesday, 29 June 2011
First Drive: 2012 Volkswagen Passat VR6
Is the Six-Cylinder Necessary?
Once upon a time, foreign midsize cars -- compacts by modern standards -- came with four-cylinder engines only. Then they got V-6s, with Honda reluctantly complying last among the major competitors with its Accord in 1995. The tide turned last year, first with the Hyundai Sonata, then its platform sibling the Kia Optima, which each launched only with four-cylinder naturally aspirated and turbo engines. Chevrolet's 2013 Malibu will come with four-cylinder engines only, when it goes on sale early next year. It wouldn't be surprising to see the next Ford Fusion follow suit with naturally aspirated and EcoBoost four engine options. The 2.0-liter TSI four far outsells the V-6 version of the premium Audi A4, which grew to a midsize car in its latest iteration. 
As such, it's impossible to avoid the term "out of date" when considering the new 2012 Volkswagen Passat VR6, even though its narrow-angle, 280-horsepower, 258 pound-foot 3.6-liter engine is the one that will make enthusiasts' hearts palpitate most -- even more so than the 140-horsepower, 236 pound-foot 2.0-liter TDI Clean Diesel. VW is chasing Honda with its new midsize car, and the Accord, after being a V-6 holdout in the '90s, is now the biggest overall-length car in this segment, offered in four-cylinder and V-6 iterations. 
In case you haven't kept up, the '12 Passat, exclusive to the North American market, though likely to be a model for China, is a couple of inches longer than a Toyota Camry, 2.5 inches shorter than the Accord, but with a wheelbase 0.2 inches longer than Accord's. It shows in the commodious rear seat's sumptuous legroom and headroom. VW promises extensive use of high-strength steel, emphasized by the manufacturer's estimated weight. These estimates typically fall short of ours, in which we fill the fuel tanks, but the Passat VR6 comes in at 3,446 pounds, just 49 pounds heavier than a similarly equipped TDI model and 225 heavier than a five-cylinder model with automatic transmission.Sum Up: EUROPEAN ALTERNATIVE TO ACCORD, CAMRY.Motor Trend Rating: 
Once upon a time, foreign midsize cars -- compacts by modern standards -- came with four-cylinder engines only. Then they got V-6s, with Honda reluctantly complying last among the major competitors with its Accord in 1995. The tide turned last year, first with the Hyundai Sonata, then its platform sibling the Kia Optima, which each launched only with four-cylinder naturally aspirated and turbo engines. Chevrolet's 2013 Malibu will come with four-cylinder engines only, when it goes on sale early next year. It wouldn't be surprising to see the next Ford Fusion follow suit with naturally aspirated and EcoBoost four engine options. The 2.0-liter TSI four far outsells the V-6 version of the premium Audi A4, which grew to a midsize car in its latest iteration. As such, it's impossible to avoid the term "out of date" when considering the new 2012 Volkswagen Passat VR6, even though its narrow-angle, 280-horsepower, 258 pound-foot 3.6-liter engine is the one that will make enthusiasts' hearts palpitate most -- even more so than the 140-horsepower, 236 pound-foot 2.0-liter TDI Clean Diesel. VW is chasing Honda with its new midsize car, and the Accord, after being a V-6 holdout in the '90s, is now the biggest overall-length car in this segment, offered in four-cylinder and V-6 iterations. In case you haven't kept up, the '12 Passat, exclusive to the North American market, though likely to be a model for China, is a couple of inches longer than a Toyota Camry, 2.5 inches shorter than the Accord, but with a wheelbase 0.2 inches longer than Accord's. It shows in the commodious rear seat's sumptuous legroom and headroom. VW promises extensive use of high-strength steel, emphasized by the manufacturer's estimated weight. These estimates typically fall short of ours, in which we fill the fuel tanks, but the Passat VR6 comes in at 3,446 pounds, just 49 pounds heavier than a similarly equipped TDI model and 225 heavier than a five-cylinder model with automatic transmission.Sum Up: EUROPEAN ALTERNATIVE TO ACCORD, CAMRY.Motor Trend Rating: Sunday, 26 June 2011
2012 Volkswagen Passat
Volkswagen's set out to completely re-engineer its core products for America, in the hopes of grabbing some of the momentum that's vaulted South Korea's Hyundai and Kia into the heart of the mid-size sedan market. With the Jetta upsized and repositioned, it's now the Passat's turn.
A massive rear seat and better-than-hybrid highway fuel economy mask the slight loss of refinement and nimble road feel in the 2012 Volkswagen Passat.German-engineered is a key phrase for the 2012 VW Passat, the company's first American-made vehicle since 1985. Issuing forth from a billion-dollar factory in Chattanooga, Tennessee, this Passat grows longer and wider, and reverts to some stalwart engines and suspension designs, so that it can be manufactured more simply, and more inexpensively--which should help VW bring the base price for the big new sedan down to about $20,000.
The Passat's certainly gained status in some important ways. The rear seat is tremendous, bigger than the bench in an Azera or an Avalon, with the kind of ease of entry and exit we're used to getting in a minivan. The trunk's also pretty vast. Road manners are as close to the outgoing Passat as they possibly can be, given the stretch in wheelbase--and the automaker's TDI diesel wows even hybrid drivers with an estimated 43-mpg highway fuel economy rating.
Like the Jetta, the Passat's taken a step back or two from some of the heights of VW's recent past. Its sheetmetal can read elegant and timeless--or in the wrong color or from the wrong angle, dull. The interior's better honed and more finely graded than the one in the Jetta, but only roughly the equal of the cabin in a Fusion or an Altima or a Legacy, and nothing like the outgoing Passat's tightly grained, rich-feeling environment. As it keeps options and models to a bare minimum, Volkswagen's omitted some features in some combinations we'd like to see, even as options. Want a base Passat TDI with cloth seats, satellite radio and a USB port? It doesn't exist.
With either of the tested engines, acceleration's mid-pack at best. We'd have no problems recommending a base Hyundai Sonata automatic for roughly $22,000, but the Passat's grumbly five-cylinder and its second-tier gas mileage make the TDI the better choice--and that means a base price of about $25,000 instead. For that price, you'll get a sedan with nearly 800 miles of driving in each tank of fuel, and limousine-like rear-seat room, with a dash of the handling brio you'd expect from a Volkswagen. If those attributes top your shopping list for a new family sedan, the Passat rules--knowing there are better values, better lookers and better straight-line performers out there, but none bigger.
The TDI lends the Passat a lively feel, even if the five-cylinder's faster--and handling's a cut above most of the competition. See details and best of the Web Simplicity helps keep the 2012 Volkswagen Passat on budget, but some drivers will miss out on leather seats, satellite radio, and USB ports. See details and best of the Web The clear green winner in the 2012 Volkswagen Passat lineup is the 43-mpg-highway TDI; VW's graunchy old five-cylinder can't keep up with modern fours on gas mileage or overall horsepower. See details and best of the Web Amazing rear-seat leg roomTDI's hybrid-beating fuel economySpare bodywork's minimalist detailsSteers and rides, for the most part, like the old PassatGet Dealer Price Quotes Five-cylinder's dull responsesPlenty of grainy plastic insideWind and road noiseFeatures list is full of potholes
Thursday, 23 June 2011
2012 Volkswagen Beetle to start under $20,000
Although still sporting the same basic shape that gives the Beetle its iconic and instantly identifiable uniqueness, Volkswagen has done some fairly extensive metallurgy to differentiate the 2012 model from the car it replaced.
Despite a more upscale look, the Beetle is aiming to snag value-minded buyers with a starting price of just $18,995 plus $770 destination. That sub-$20,000 price will get you a basic model that still uses the same 2.5-liter five-cylinder engine used in the outgoing model, matched to a five-speed manual transmission.
Step up to the 2.0-liter TSI model and its 200 horsepower, 207 lb-ft of torque, and your base price will start at $24,165, with another $5,000+ of option potential. VW has yet to announce pricing for its third and final engine, a 2.0-liter TDI diesel.
What we know
Designed to both sportier and more fuel efficient than before, the new Beetle looks like a squashed version of the outgoing model, which has actually been out of production since last year. Riding on a version of the A5 architecture that underpins the Volkswagen Jetta, the Beetle shares little more than powertrains with the outgoing car.
The “cathedral” domed roof of the first New Beetle is gone, replaced instead by a still characteristically bug-like roof that, although more conventional, hardly looks like anything else on the road. Bug-eyed headlamps return, while the tail lamps have been stretched out. Some models will use a rear spoiler mounted just below the rear window. The Beetle retains its cargo-friendly hatchback shape and its cartoonish bulging fenders.
Some markets will see Xenon headlamps with LED running lights as an optional extra.
Inside, the look is considerably more mature, with the outgoing car’s decade-old styling themes a thing of the past. Switchgear follows VW convention, although available accessory gauges mounted at the top of the dashboard hint at the car’s newfound sportiness. VW hasn’t released exact trim specifications for North American models, but we’d expect to see a reasonably large range of options that include the automaker’s leather-like vinyl trim, heated seats, navigation and, of course, a full range of safety features.
A vertical glovebox mounted flush with the dashboard is designed to hark back to the original Beetle, although the new car has an extra unit mounted below for additional storage. Try as we might, we can’t locate a bud vase. A panoramic moonroof and a Fender-branded audio system will also be on the options list, depending on trim level.
Trunk space is actually up despite the decreased roofline; VW says about 10.9 cubic feet of luggage can be sequestered away behind the second row.
A new outlook
Globally, VW will offer the Beetle in three different themes – Beetle, Design and Sport. In other words, “basic,” stylish” and “performance-oriented.”
In North America, three engine options will be available – a 2.5-liter five-cylinder used in just about every VW product on these shores, a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder gas engine and a 2.0-liter turbodiesel four-cylinder.
The five will power most North American Beetles. Rated at 170 horsepower, this engine will be capable of 22/31 mpg with a six-speed stick and 22/29 with a six-speed automatic. Fuel economy won’t take much of a hit with the 2.0-liter turbo gas motor, which will be rated at 200 ponies and 207 lb-ft. of torque. VW says that the car will average 25 mpg combined, the same figure as the five-cylinder manual car. That engine will also be paired with a locking front differential called XDS. Designed to help improve high-speed traction, it is one of several performance credentials that set the new car apart from its predecessor.
Meanwhile, the turbodiesel will be the fuel miser Beetle at 29/40 mpg (33 combined). Both six-speed manual and six-speed automatic gearboxes will be available.
2012 VW Beetles should begin arriving in dealers late this summer after production begins at the automaker’s Puebla, Mexico, assembly plant.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)