Showing posts with label NHTSA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NHTSA. Show all posts

Saturday, 23 July 2011

NHTSA Puts Industry On Notice: A Car Is Not A Mobile Device

Continuing a campaign initiated by Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood, the administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) addressed the Telematics Detroit 2011 conference with harsh words on the growing trend to integrate infotainment technology into cars.

David Strickland told those assembled, “I’m just putting everyone on notice. A car is not a mobile device. I’m not in the business of helping people tweet better. I’m not in the business of helping people post on Facebook better.”

That’s not to say that the NHTSA and DOT are opposed to all telematics applications. In fact, the agencies support systems that provide remote vehicle diagnostics, on-board navigation and automated crash response (like GM’s OnStar and Hyundai’s Blue Link). What the agencies oppose is any on-board system that leads to distracted driving, frequently citing that 995 of the 30,797 fatal crashes in 2009 involved drivers using cell phones. 

Automakers, on the other hand, are caught between what the government requires and what their customers want. Generation Y drivers are focused on in-car technology and don’t see texting as a distraction to driving; instead, they see driving as a distraction to texting, which is an alarming trend by itself.

Unless--or until--cars become automated transportation pods requiring no driver involvement, this clash between technology, the NHTSA and automakers won’t find an easy resolution.

[Detroit Free Press, CNBC]



View the original article here

Tuesday, 14 June 2011

Report: NASA, NHTSA reports clearing Toyota were influenced by automaker

Tuesday, May 24th, 2011 @ 3:37 p.m.

In February Leftlane reported that the joint effort by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the NASA Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) had released its findings after investigating potential sources of unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles.

The report largely concluded that scientists and engineers were unable to reproduce any type of unintended acceleration in a lab environment, prompting Toyota to issue a press release touting the findings and its innocence. Now, a watchdog group focused on the automotive industry, Safety Research & Strategies, has released an analysis of the government’s findings that seems to paint a somewhat contradictory picture.

According to the findings of the watchdog group, NASA actually identified “numerous failures in Toyota electronics that could lead to unwanted acceleration.” SRS goes on to make the direct claim that the reports issued by the government agencies were not only “narrowly construed examinations of limited vehicles and components,” but even going as far as to claim that the reports were “heavily influenced by Toyota and its experts, including Exponent [the agency Toyota hired as a third party to investigate the unintended acceleration issue].”

Research by SRS is directly at odds with the published conclusion of the government’s findings, pointing out that testing found several scenarios in which the engine’s speed could be increased, RPMs could surge, or throttle positioning could be at odds with the positioning of the accelerator pedal without tripping a Diagnostic Trouble Code (DTC).

SRS goes on to make the case that NASA and NHTSA failed to procure any outside professionals on their own accord that specialized in vehicle engine management or testing, instead relying on Toyota to guide them in those areas. SRS says that the report shows the government also relied on Exponent, the third party hired by Toyota, in order to dismiss a key finding concerning a phenomenon known as “tin whiskers.”

Tin whiskers are hair-like structures which can causes electrical shorts and they were found in “virtually every potentiometer accelerator pedal assembly inspected – including a vehicle whose pedal was replaced by Toyota following acceleration problems.” The report even verified that tin whiskers as a cause of electronic malfunction.

“These studies were far from independent. They are the products of Toyota’s involvement and that of the company’s litigation defense experts who provided the statistical analysis that the agencies used to dismiss the physical evidence that showed flaws in Toyota’s electronics,” says SRS President Sean Kane. “Contrary to Secretary Ray LaHood’s pronouncements, the investigations actually showed numerous ways that Toyotas can experience unintended acceleration without alerting the fault detection system. They were simply dismissed as unlikely.”

SRS has produced several reports of its own on the issue, including an 72-page report that specifically focuses on the presence of Electronic Throttle Control System-Intelligent (ETCS-i) and the correlating spike in unintended acceleration on those vehicle. SRS believes that there is an undeniable correlation between vehicles experiencing unintended acceleration and the existence of the throttle system on the vehicles.

Toyota and supplier CTS are currently facing a class-action lawsuit specifically aimed at “inherent design defects” in Toyota’s ETCS-i system, which was first introduced in 2001.

About SRS: SRS was founded in 2004 by Sean Kane, who in his career has prompted several federal safety investigations. Kane was a key player in revealing the faulty Firestone tires on Ford Explorers in 2000. Later, SRS played a pivotal role in the Congressional hearings on Toyota’s unintended acceleration woes in 2010, testifying before the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

References
1.’NHTSA-NASA reports…’ view


View the original article here

Sunday, 17 April 2011

NHTSA expands transmission investigation to 1.5M Ford SUVs

Wednesday, Apr 13th, 2011 @ 5:52 p.m.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has expanded its investigation into 1.5 million Ford SUVs for defective transmissions. The investigation, which now includes 2002-05 model year Ford Explorer and Mercury Mountaineer models and Lincoln Aviators from 2003-05, originally launched in 2009.

The agency has received hundreds of complaints involving the vehicles in question rolling away after the driver had put the vehicle in park. The complaints include 85 crashes and 32 injuries. No fatalities have been linked to the transmission defect.

“We have expanded the scope of the investigation to include components other than the brake shift interlock system,” NHTSA’s director of defects investigation, Frank Borris, said.

The NHTSA’s probe is focusing on the vehicles’ transmission parking pawl assembly components. The pawl is a device that allows the transmission to lock into park.

In addition to the rollaway reports, the NHTSA has also received 883 complaints of drivers having difficulty or not being able to shift the vehicle into park.

In a separate case, Ford is facing the recall of 1.3 million F-150 models. Ford recalled 135,000 F-150s earlier this year for an airbag defect, but has refused to comply with the NHTSA’s request to recall 1.3 million addition units. The NHTSA says the F-150’s airbags can deploy without warning.

References
1.’Feds expand probe…’ view


View the original article here