Showing posts with label Vehicles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vehicles. Show all posts

Thursday, 14 July 2011

Recall Alert: 2011 Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep Vehicles

Chrysler is recalling some 11,351 model year 2011 vehicles to inspect and potentially repair a steering column pivot rivet. An incorrectly installed or missing rivet could compromise the integrity of the steering column in the event of a crash.  Under such circumstances, the effectiveness of the frontal impact safety system would be reduced, heightening the chance of injury.

Models affected by this recall are as follows:

The recall is expected to begin later this month, and owners will be contacted via U.S. Mail. Dealers will inspect the steering column to verify that the rivets are present and properly aligned, and will repair as necessary. Owners of the above vehicles can reach Chrysler’s customer service hotline at (800) 853-1403, or they can contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Vehicle Safety Hotline at (888) 327-4236.

[NHTSA]



View the original article here

Thursday, 30 June 2011

Nissan testing mobile charging vehicles to quell EV range anxiety

New Cars Home

Learn more about new cars with our extensive collection of overviews, specifications, and pictures.


View the original article here

Sunday, 26 June 2011

DOT proposes data-recording black boxes for all light-duty vehicles

New Cars Home

Learn more about new cars with our extensive collection of overviews, specifications, and pictures.


View the original article here

Tuesday, 21 June 2011

At Your Own Risk: These Vehicles Have The Highest Death Rates

It's might be hard to believe looking at safety equipment lists, or even crash-test results, but you're statistically a few hundred times more likely to die if you're behind the wheel of a Nissan 350Z or Chevrolet Aveo than if you're in a Toyota Sienna or Audi A6.

Looking at driver deaths per million registered vehicle years, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has released its latest annual figures on a model-by-model basis and found a vast difference between models. For instance, the Nissan 350Z has the highest fatality rate, at 143 versus, a number of vehicles—including the Toyota Sienna, plus all-wheel-drive versions of the Audi A6 and Mercedes-Benz E-Class plus 4WD versions of a number of mid-size SUVs—essentially rounded down to zero.

But looking at the fatality-rate numbers at face value would be unfair. Of course, these rates don't have all that much to do with the relative safety of vehicles and are more indicative of typical use and location—as well as the demographics and driving styles of their drivers.

For the Nissan Z, for example, its high rate was mostly due to an especially high instance of single-vehicle crashes—a reckless-driving situation in which the vehicle leaves the roadway to hit a tree or barrier, for example. And the Chevy Malibu Classic has an especially high rate of deaths in multiple-vehicle crashes—likely related to how that model was used mostly in rental-car fleets, with travelers who are fatigued or in unfamiliar locales.

The latest results do point out a couple of very significant trends, however: First, that size counts; all but 3 of the 26 models with the lowest death rates are mid-size or larger, the IIHS points out. Second, even with the same weight class, SUVs are arguably now safer and have lower death rates. As we pointed out in separate posts, electronic stability control is working and has erased the rollover disadvantage once held.

The rates and rankings are calculated based on driver deaths only, not those of passengers, for model-year 2005-2008 vehicles during calendar years 2006 through 2009. 

Filtering out multiple versions or body styles of like models, here are the vehicles with the highest rates of driver death:

Nissan 350Z – 143 (deaths per million registered vehicle miles)
Nissan Titan (crew cab) – 126
Chevrolet Aveo – 119
Chevrolet Cobalt (4-door) – 117
Kia Spectra – 102
Chevrolet Malibu Classic – 99
Hyundai Tiburon – 96
Nissan Versa – 96
Chevrolet Colorado (extended cab) – 93
Kia Rio – 89

[IIHS]



View the original article here

Thursday, 16 June 2011

DOT proposes data-recording black boxes for all light-duty vehicles

New Cars Home

Learn more about new cars with our extensive collection of overviews, specifications, and pictures.


View the original article here

Monday, 6 June 2011

Connected Vehicles - Cars That Avoid Crashes

Connected Vehicles or Cars That Avoid Crashes are actually cars that can talk to each other. And not just cars, but trucks, buses, bikes and motorcycles will soon be talking away. What will they talk about? They will help each other avoid accidents. Find out about these cars and the Connected Vehicle Technology Challenge.

(NAPSI)—Cars, trucks, buses and even bikes and motorcycles may soon be able to “talk” to each other to detect dangerous situations and help drivers avoid crashes before they happen.

“Connected vehicles will alert drivers if another vehicle is about to run the red light, when a car in their blind spot drifts too close for comfort, if there’s a crash ahead or even if the next bridge is getting icy,” explained Scott Belcher, president and CEO of the Intelligent Transportation Society of America, who noted that vehicles can also be equipped with pre-emptive braking systems to help drivers slow down.

In addition, connected vehicles can provide real-time information and navigation to avoid traffic, find better routes, check transit schedules, locate and reserve a parking space and pay tolls.

To find more good ideas, the Research and Innovative Technology Administration launched the Connected Vehicle Technology Challenge, a national competition seeking ideas for ways to use connectivity between vehicles to make transportation safer, greener and easier. More at www.Challenge.gov and www.itsa.org.


View the original article here

Wednesday, 11 May 2011

Volkswagen Torture Testing Its Vehicles: Video

Volkswagen Transporter van thrown into the air

Volkswagen Transporter van thrown into the air

Before the proliferation of electronic sensors and computer technology in the world of cars, engineers actually used to go out and beat the hell out of the cars they were testing--quite literally.

BMX-style jumping ramps, old-fashioned door slamming and even a sledgehammer or two to a roof panel were all tricks of the trade as we’ll see in this latest video of durability testing by Volkswagen engineers.

The lineup of vehicles includes everything from a Transporter van, pictured above, to a MkIV Golf and even the outgoing New Beetle.

What’s interesting to see--or perhaps shocking--is that most of the test drivers don’t appear to have any safety gear whatsoever, despite their vehicles leaping into the air several feet or running off highways at high speed.

Go ahead and click play now.



View the original article here

Sunday, 1 May 2011

Connected Vehicles - Cars That Avoid Crashes

Connected Vehicles or Cars That Avoid Crashes are actually cars that can talk to each other. And not just cars, but trucks, buses, bikes and motorcycles will soon be talking away. What will they talk about? They will help each other avoid accidents. Find out about these cars and the Connected Vehicle Technology Challenge.

(NAPSI)—Cars, trucks, buses and even bikes and motorcycles may soon be able to “talk” to each other to detect dangerous situations and help drivers avoid crashes before they happen.

“Connected vehicles will alert drivers if another vehicle is about to run the red light, when a car in their blind spot drifts too close for comfort, if there’s a crash ahead or even if the next bridge is getting icy,” explained Scott Belcher, president and CEO of the Intelligent Transportation Society of America, who noted that vehicles can also be equipped with pre-emptive braking systems to help drivers slow down.

In addition, connected vehicles can provide real-time information and navigation to avoid traffic, find better routes, check transit schedules, locate and reserve a parking space and pay tolls.

To find more good ideas, the Research and Innovative Technology Administration launched the Connected Vehicle Technology Challenge, a national competition seeking ideas for ways to use connectivity between vehicles to make transportation safer, greener and easier. More at www.Challenge.gov and www.itsa.org.


View the original article here

Monday, 18 April 2011

Charger, Sonata, Cruze Among Insurer-Rated Best-Value Vehicles

If you're wanting to keep costs down with your next vehicle, you'll want to pay attention here: The insurer USAA has compiled a list of best-value vehicles using three main criteria: cost (including purchase price, insurance, and fuel costs); safety (looking only at Insurance Institute for Highway Safety ratings); and reliability.

USAA says that more reliable vehicles cost less to maintain, which is usually, but not always, the case from our experience.

Luckily, we can agree on a number of vehicles that are stylish, perform well, and are comfortable, in addition to meeting all of those objective points. From their list the 2011 Chevrolet Cruze, Ford Mustang, Hyundai Sonata, Audi A4, Kia Sportage, Audi Q7, Lexus RX 450h are all among our top picks, achieving an Overall Rating of 8.0 or higher in TheCarConnection's vehicle ratings.

For those not familiar, our editors rate vehicles in six different categories—including objective areas like safety and features, as well as more subjective areas including styling and comfort.

USAA has more information on each of its picks at http://www.usaa.com/bestvalue.

Here's their complete list of best-value vehicles:

Large Sedan: Dodge Charger
Midsize Sedan: Hyundai Sonata
Small Sedan: Chevrolet Cruze
Large Luxury Sedan: Hyundai Genesis
Midsize Luxury Sedan: Audi A4
Large SUV: Chevrolet Traverse
Midsize SUV: Toyota FJ Cruiser
Small SUV: Kia Sportage
Large Luxury SUV: Audi Q7
Midsize Luxury SUV: Lexus RX 450h
Large Pickup: Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Hybrid
Small Pickup: Suzuki Equator
Sports: Ford Mustang
Coupe: Scion tC
Wagon: Scion xB
Minivan: Kia Sedona

[USAA]



View the original article here

Sunday, 17 April 2011

Chrysler bringing natural gas-powered vehicles to U.S. by 2017

Thursday, Apr 14th, 2011 @ 2:35 a.m.

Chrysler, now 30 percent owned by Italian automaker Fiat spA, has revealed that it is working on bringing technology from part owner Fiat to the U.S. to fuel vehicle with natural gas.

Although Fiat only recently upped its stake in U.S. automaker Chrysler LLC to 30 percent, the automaker intends to increase its stake to 51 percent before it supplies Chrysler with engines that run on natural gas, which are currently in use in Europe, according to a Bloomberg report. Fiat intends to import the technology as a way to reduce the emissions of its vehicles at a lower cost than alternatives, such as hybrids or electric cars.

This wasn’t the first time Chrysler hinted interested in natural gas-powered technology, as nearly one year ago Chrysler mentioned interest in the technology, and also pointed out that Fiat offers CNG-powered engines ranging from 1.0-liter to 7.8-liters.

“The technology is very actively being worked on,” Bob Lee, Chrysler vice president of engine and electrified propulsion systems, while speaking with Bloomberg. Lee added, “It’s a good way for some diversity in the market in terms of fuel use.”

Although Lee did not list the vehicles that are being considered for possible compressed natural gas engines, Fred Diaz, head of Chrysler’s Ram brand said, “I’m eager and very interested to see what we can do with CNG in our truck applications.” We also know that Fiat uses natural gas in the European Fiat 500, making that vehicle an almost guaranteed candidate to receive the technology in the U.S.

Currently, General Motors is selling CNG-powered vehicles, but they are limited to fleet sales. Honda Motor Co. is the only full-line automaker in the U.S. that is currently selling vehicles directly to the public with CNG-capable engines installed from the factory, although many others have available post-manufacturing retrofitting available.

References
1.’Officers who…’ view


View the original article here

Friday, 15 April 2011

Ford: Supply Limited For Black, Red Vehicles

If you're looking for one of several Ford or Lincoln vehicles in black or red, you'd better be ready to settle with what's out at the dealership—and potentially even paying a little extra. Ford has just told its dealerships to halt orders of some models with certain hues of semi-metallic red or black paint, because of a supply interruption due to the recent earthquake in Japan.

Tuxedo Black is temporarily not offered for order on a number of Ford trucks and SUVs, as well as the Ford Taurus and Lincoln MKX. There's also a problem with red for Ford F-Series Super Duty and Ranger pickups, Econoline vans, and the Ford Focus and Lincoln Navigator.

According to CNN Money, both hues rely on an ingredient called Xirallic to get a slightly metallic look, and the recent natural disaster in Japan caused a supply disruption from the company that was providing it.

Don't look for the shortage to last that long; Ford is looking for another ingredient to take its place.

[CNN Money]



View the original article here

Monday, 4 April 2011

Researchers: Hackers Could Break Into Vehicles From A Distance

If you drive a new or nearly new car, you could be packing just as much computing power in your vehicle as you have on your desk or in your briefcase.

Plus, vehicles are more connected than ever before. And that connectivity, while it can make our vehicles better and our experience more convenient and secure in most cases, can also be exploited by hackers.

Last week, researchers presented findings to the National Academies Committee on Electronic Vehicle Controls and Unintended Acceleration, which included an examination of electronic throttle controls as well as other electronic vehicle functions, looking at their design, reliability, software, environmental factors and, notably, their cybersecurity.

In the research, a team of ten computer-security experts looked at vehicle security over the course of two years—following up on a paper we reported on last year—and looked for vulnerabilities through which they might gain control of the vehicle or some of its subsystems.

Could they hack into a vehicle's Bluetooth hands-free system? Check. Its emergency-services cellular-network connection? Check. Could they access central vehicle controls through those entry points, without any physical access to the vehicle? Check.

The researchers didn't single out any brands or models, but they looked at a number of vehicles that include an embedded cellular connection to provide an automated emergency response, as well as call-center concierge services. Examples include OnStar (GM), Safety Connect (Toyota), Enform (Lexus ), Sync (Ford), and Mbrace (Mercedes-Benz).

Although they point to no specific or dire vulnerabilities, the exercise essentially demonstrates to automakers and suppliers that if an attacker is determined (and knowledgeable) enough, he or she can gain access.

The hackers even managed to hack into vehicles using vulnerabilities in cellular-connection-based safety features—such as those that automatically allow concierge services when the airbags inflate (or trigger the systems to call 911).

In one attack scenario, the team looking for these vulnerabilities showed that thieves or mischief-makers could target particular models of vehicles remotely, find their location, and unlock them without forcing any physical entry. Worse yet, the team showed that they could disable a vehicle's brakes electronically.

The research team's findings will be assembled in a report to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), in hopes of new standards for security in vehicle systems.

Is this all too alarmist? Perhaps. A professor overseeing the research told Technology Review that the primary researchers both feel comfortable driving their vehicles.

That said, it's probably time for automakers to think a little more seriously about security.

Are you concerned about the security of certain vehicle options or components? Let us know which ones and why.

[Center for Automotive Embedded Security, via New York Times and Technology Review]



View the original article here